In this episode from the Making Sense with Sam Harris podcast, Harris provides a nuanced examination of mindfulness and the concept of self. He distinguishes between dualistic mindfulness, which aims to reduce anxiety, and non-dual mindfulness, which reveals the illusion of a separate self.
Harris also dives into the nature of consciousness and the self, arguing that the sense of self as a separate entity is illusory and that direct experience transcends this illusion. Additionally, he explores determinism, free will, and their implications for compassion and responsibility. Throughout the discussion, Harris emphasizes the paradox of meditation as a practice realizing that ultimately, there is no one doing it.
Sign up for Shortform to access the whole episode summary along with additional materials like counterarguments and context.
Sam Harris distinguishes dualistic mindfulness, which aims to reduce anxiety while maintaining self-experience separation, from non-dual mindfulness, which reveals the illusion of a separate self, enabling direct experience of consciousness's openness.
Dualistic mindfulness lessens identification with thoughts and emotions, while non-dual mindfulness reveals an inherent freedom transcending control of experience, Harris notes.
Practices like "looking for the looker" reveal no central self, Harris explains. Walking meditation with open eyes can make recognizing non-dual awareness easier by showing the illusion of a separate self.
Harris emphasizes the illusory nature of the self as a separate, controlling entity. Consciousness lacks an inherent center or subject; the sense of self arises from thoughts and mental processes.
Non-dual awareness involves recognizing the interdependence and unity between the perceiver, perceived, consciousness, and its contents. Harris suggests viewing even negative emotions as expressions of openness within non-dual consciousness.
Language and concepts reinforce the illusion of separateness, Harris argues. Meditation transcends concepts, allowing direct experience of non-dual consciousness.
From a non-dual view, the sense of free will is illusory, as actions arise from prior causes and conditions beyond individual agency, Harris explains. Agency and decision-making still aid navigation of daily life.
Recognizing behavior's deterministic nature fosters compassion by viewing others as products of circumstances. The focus shifts to conditions supporting well-being and positive change.
Meditation reveals no self to improve, only consciousness's inherent freedom, Harris says. Yet meditation itself is a practice realizing there's no one doing it.
1-Page Summary
Mindfulness and meditation practices are explored in depth, discussing the distinctions between dualistic and non-dualistic approaches and their respective benefits as well as highlighting specific techniques that can aid in developing non-dualistic mindfulness.
Sam Harris compares dualistic mindfulness to learning an instrument, starting in ignorance and gradually gaining skill. This form of mindfulness attempts to improve the experience, for instance, by reducing anxiety, thereby maintaining a sense of separation between the self and experience. Harris implies that while dualistic mindfulness can prevent one from being lost in thought, it still operates with an agenda and is only an intermediate stage on the path of mindfulness.
Non-dual mindfulness, on the other hand, is about recognizing the immediate availability of the insight one seeks. In this practice, the realization emerges that there's no center to experience or a distinct self doing the waking up. Non-dual mindfulness thus transcends the need to control the experience and reveals an inherent freedom and openness within consciousness, not based on identification with thoughts or reactions.
Harris notes that dualistic mindfulness provides the ability to step off the ride of continual thought and notice when one is caught in unnecessary suffering. It builds concentration and aids in becoming less identified with thoughts and emotions, contributing to a state of equanimity.
Non-dual mindfulness leads to the discovery of an inherent freedom, a state of consciousness that exists prior to identification with thought and is always the condition of all experience. Harris explains that simply noticing the impermanence of thoughts and emotions leads to this freedom.
The hosts discuss a mental move in non-dual mindfulness by prompting the practitioner to turn their attention back at the self who is experiencing the breath, which helps understand the self-illusion. Harris talks about techniques li ...
Mindfulness and Meditation Practices
Sam Harris delves deep into the enigmatic topic of consciousness and the elusive concept of the self, highlighting the illusionary aspects and the potential for non-dual awareness.
Sam Harris emphasizes the illusory nature of the self as a separate, controlling entity. He points out that our conventional sense of self as a controller is a mere product of thoughts and mental processes, rather than an indivisible part of our consciousness.
Harris articulates that the idea of a separable 'you', a locus of free will within us, is not supported by the workings of our minds and bodies. Consciousness, he suggests, has no central "I" but is rather a spontaneous occurrence that does not originate from an individualized self.
In mindfulness and meditation practices, the recognition of selflessness can occur unexpectedly, revealing that the consciousness we experience is free from any central ego or self. Observing the space where emotions like anger arise shows us that there is more to an individual than transitory feelings, suggesting an inherent openness and the absence of a fixed self during experiences.
On the topic of non-dual awareness, discussions center around the unity of everything within the experience, merging the duality of self and universe into a harmonious whole. Negative emotions, instead of being experiences to shy away from, become expressions of the openness that characterizes non-dual consciousness.
Non-dual awareness implies recognizing the unity and interdependence between the observer, the observed, and the fabric of consciousness. Harris speaks of looking within and finding no distinct self or thinker, suggesting a merging of identities – we are the universe experiencing itself.
Sam Harris reveals a mindful approach to negative emotions, suggesting that even these can be viewed as expressions of the fundamental openness within consciousness. Through this non-dualistic lens, one is not alienated by distressing emotions but appreciates them as an integral part of the grand tapestry of experience.
Harris points to language and conceptual thinking as principal culprits reinforcing the illusion of a separate, dualistic self. Meditation, however, becomes ...
The Nature of Consciousness and the Self
Dan Harris and Sam Harris explore the complex topics of determinism and free will, discussing their implications for understanding human behavior.
Dan Harris speaks about the illusion of free will from a deterministic perspective, where past causes and conditions beyond individual agency affect our actions.
Sam Harris explains that what we perceive as free will is just a series of consequences following each other like dominoes. He uses the example of choosing chocolate over Vegemite, explaining that our preferences and decisions arise from conditions and influences we did not create and cannot inspect, such as genetic and environmental factors, brain chemistry, and past conditioning.
The reaction to a conversation, whether it's persuasion or boredom, is not chosen but results from innate responses to stimuli. Even a seemingly defiant act of free choice is predetermined by prior conditions and not an expression of free will.
Dan Harris adds that people can use what feels like their agency to make good decisions, supporting a visceral experience of the illusion of self and free will. He suggests that actions and decisions arise from prior causes and conditions, which emphasizes the absence of a separate self.
Despite the illusion of free will, decision-making is still a useful tool for navigating daily life. Through mindfulness, it's possible to feel compassion for those difficult to understand, recognizing them as products of their circumstances. The deterministic view does not render decision-making impotent; Harris argues that one can still reason with people and influence their behavior through dialogue and incentives.
Recognizing behavior's deterministic nature fosters compassion and emphasizes the importance of conditions that support well-being and positive change.
Viewing people as helpless actors of prior causes and conditions is an antidote to hatred because they could not have acted differently. People can be reasoned with and influenced, even though their actions are the result of causes and conditions.
Harris speaks about compassion within the context of determinism, suggesting that recognizing the deterministic nature of human behavior leads to compassion, as we view others’ actio ...
Determinism, Free Will, and Their Implications
Download the Shortform Chrome extension for your browser