Dive into complex social questions in the latest episode of "Making Sense with Sam Harris," where host Sam Harris engages with guests Rory Stewart and Coleman Hughes on the sensitive nexus of race, policy, and ideology. Searching for the nuance in heated debates, the trio skin deep into how crime statistics intersect with police practices and racial dynamics in America's urban landscapes. Hughes shares NYPD data alongside personal reflections to discuss the ripple effects of crime rates on communities and law enforcement, touching on hard truths about public perception and police vigilance.
The podcast goes beyond simple statistical analysis, as the speakers tackle topics like diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) policies, academia's ideological leanings, and the battle for colorblindness in public policy. They critically examine the divergence between academic jargon and the lived experience of marginalized groups, drawing on the seldom-agreed-upon term "Latinx" as a case study. The conversation also questions the ideological underpinnings of university policies, while Hughes stands firm on the prospects and challenges of a colorblind society—countering the identity politics that have gained traction in contemporary discourse. Join Sam Harris and his guests as they explore these weighty issues, unrestrained by easy answers or ideological simplicity.
Sign up for Shortform to access the whole episode summary along with additional materials like counterarguments and context.
Harris and Hughes delve into the interplay between police practices and racial dynamics in relation to crime rates in American cities. Hughes shares personal experiences and refers to NYPD statistics to indicate the need for racial awareness in areas with high crime rates. In cities like New York, where crime data shows racial patterns, this reality informs both public perception and police conduct. Officers often operate with heightened safety concerns and suspicion, especially because a disproportionate number of violent crimes are committed by black and Hispanic individuals. Harris introduces Jesse Jackson's candid remarks about feeling safer when a white person is walking behind him at night, mirroring the sensitive and complex association between race and crime that affects even the black community.
Hughes reminisces about the foundational goals of DEI policies, portraying them as originally intended to promote a more diverse and equitable corporate environment. He explains that DEI had noble aspirations, aiming to create workplaces that offered equal opportunities and greater representation of all groups—a concept his father might have supported back in the 90s. Despite their well-meaning origins, these policies have evolved in the implementation and discourse around them.
Highlighting a disconnect between elite academic rhetoric and the everyday lives of its subjects, Hughes draws attention to the term "Latinx" as an example. This term, popular among academic elites, is not widely embraced by the Hispanic population, with up to 96% disfavoring or being unaware of it, according to Pew research. This gap suggests a discrepancy between the vocabulary preferred by elites and the terms that resonate with actual community members, revealing a larger issue of failure in elite ideology to connect with the people it aims to represent.
The conversation turns critical toward universities, proposing that these institutions might be under 'ideological capture', where political beliefs heavily influence their policies. University presidents, for example, have been scrutinized for their reticence to outright condemn antisemitism. Such incidents have escalated to congressional hearings that question institutional responsibilities and leadership roles in protecting free speech while combating hate and discrimination, reflecting society's broader challenge in maintaining impartiality on campuses.
The concept of colorblindness sparks a thought-provoking discussion between Harris and Hughes. They advocate for the treatment of individuals without considering race and argue to depoliticize racial differences in the public policy domain. Hughes maintains a strong stance in favor of colorblindness, while acknowledging the complexities it presents when addressing racial disparities like crime rates. A notable trend is that colorblindness is losing its positioning as a goal among the political left, replaced by identity politics. This shift, seen during Hughes's TED talk on the topic, signals an ideological move away from striving to treat people without regard to race.
1-Page Summary
Harris and Hughes address the complex relationship between police practices, perceptions of safety, and the racial dynamics of crime rates in American cities.
In high-crime areas, particularly in cities like New York, there is a palpable necessity for police to be cognizant of race, as Hughes confirms while discussing his experiences and NYPD statistics. Harris highlights that higher crime rates in specific racial communities affect how individuals, including police officers, perceive and react in terms of safety and suspicion.
Hughes notes that in many American cities, crime statistics show strong racial patterns. This inevitably influences public perception and law enforcement practices. In New York City, where the majority of cops are of color, there is an acknowledgment that a significant portion of shootings and violent crimes are committed by individuals who are ...
Police racial bias and crime rates
Hughes reflects on the origins of DEI policies, framing them as well-intentioned measures aimed at fostering a more representative and opportunistic workplace.
Hughes discusses the original and benign idea of DEI, suggesting it was conceived as a strategy that his father might have endorsed during his time in corp ...
Diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) policies
...
Hughes addresses the disconnect between the language used by academic and social elites and the preferences of the broader Hispanic community.
Hughes notes that the term "Latinx," which emerged in elite academic circles such as Columbia University, has not found the same traction within Hispanic communities, particularly in working-class contexts. He shares that this term felt odd and mismatched with his experiences within his own Puerto Rican family.
Backing up his own personal observations, Hughes cites Pew res ...
Failures of elite ideology
Universities are becoming increasingly scrutinized for how they address sensitive issues such as antisemitism, as well as their adherence to a set of ideological norms that may compromise their commitment to impartiality and freedom of expression.
In a climate of heightening concern over hate speech and discrimination on campus, some university presidents appear to struggle with unequivocally condemning antisemitism. This reluctance has sparked a broader conversation about the potential for 'ideological capture' at places of higher learning, where administrative and academic policies may be heavily influenced by certain political or ideological beliefs.
The issue has escalated to the point of congressional intervention, with recent congressional hearings questioning university policies and their leaders' responses to incidents of a ...
Ideological capture at universities
Sam Harris and his guest, Coleman Hughes, engage in a detailed conversation about the concept of colorblindness, its implications, and its current status in political discourse based on Hughes’s new book "The End of Race Politics, Arguments for a Colorblind America."
Hughes defines colorblindness in terms of race as an effort to treat individuals without regard to their race and to strive to remove race as a category from public policy. Harris aligns with this perspective, sharing that he does not find race ethically or politically significant unless it connects to addressing historical injustices that require rectification. He envisions a future where racial differences are acknowledged and may even be celebrated but do not carry political or ethical weight.
While the potential abandonment by the political left of colorblindness as a goal is not directly detailed, Harris does indicate that the concept is increasingly being side-lined. He suggests that colorblindness is being traded for political factionalism, which he believes distorts politics and moral discourse. The complexity of adhering to colorblindness, especially when faced with racial disparities in areas such as crime rates, is acknowle ...
The concept of colorblindness
Download the Shortform Chrome extension for your browser