#472 – Terence Tao: Hardest Problems in Mathematics, Physics & the Future of AI
In this episode of the Lex Fridman Podcast, mathematician Terence Tao discusses his work on several major mathematical challenges, including the Navier-Stokes equations in fluid dynamics and the complex nature of prime numbers. He explains how these problems involve finding balance between randomness and structure, particularly in conjectures like the Riemann Hypothesis and Twin Prime Conjecture.
The conversation also explores the developing relationship between mathematics and artificial intelligence. Tao shares his observations about proof languages like Lean and the current capabilities and limitations of AI in mathematical work. He describes how AI tools might change mathematical experimentation and collaboration, while noting the challenges these systems face when dealing with advanced mathematical concepts.
This is a preview of the Shortform summary of the Jun 15, 2025 episode of the Lex Fridman Podcast
Sign up for Shortform to access the whole episode summary along with additional materials like counterarguments and context.
1-Page Summary
Tao's Research on Challenging Mathematical Problems
Renowned mathematician Terence Tao explores complex mathematical problems with an exploratory mindset. His work spans fluid dynamics, where he studies the Navier-Stokes equations and the possibility of "finite time blowup" in fluid behavior. While not directly working on the Poincaré Conjecture, Tao discusses Perelman's groundbreaking solution using concepts like reduced volume and entropy. In his work on the Collatz Conjecture, Tao employs probabilistic methods, comparing the sequences to stock market fluctuations while remaining cautious about potential outliers.
The Difficulty Of Proving Famous Mathematical Conjectures
Tao explains that famous mathematical conjectures, particularly those involving prime numbers, present unique challenges due to the delicate balance between randomness and structure. The Riemann Hypothesis suggests primes act as randomly as possible, but proving this true randomness remains elusive. Similarly, the Twin Prime Conjecture faces obstacles due to what Tao describes as a potential "conspiracy" in prime number structure that might prevent the existence of infinite twin primes, despite their apparently random distribution.
The Intersection of Mathematics, Computers, and AI
Tao shares his perspective on the evolving role of AI in mathematics, particularly regarding proof languages like Lean. While these tools offer reliable verification, Tao notes that formalizing proofs remains labor-intensive, taking roughly ten times longer than traditional methods. He sees potential for AI in lemma searching and proof strategies, though current AI lacks the subtlety needed for advanced mathematical work. Looking forward, Tao envisions AI enhancing mathematical experimentation and potentially transforming how mathematicians collaborate, despite current limitations in handling complex proofs.
1-Page Summary
Additional Materials
Counterarguments
- While Tao's exploratory mindset is valuable, it's worth noting that not all mathematical progress comes from exploration; some comes from systematic study or the application of established methods.
- The study of the Navier-Stokes equations is a significant area of research, but there are other equally important unsolved problems in fluid dynamics that also deserve attention.
- Tao's discussion of Perelman's solution to the Poincaré Conjecture is insightful, but alternative interpretations and methods might also provide valuable insights into the problem.
- Probabilistic methods in the study of the Collatz Conjecture are interesting, but they may not necessarily bring us closer to a proof, as the conjecture might require a completely different approach.
- The challenges in proving mathematical conjectures involving prime numbers are well-documented, but there may be undiscovered methods or perspectives that could simplify these problems.
- The Riemann Hypothesis and the nature of primes are still not fully understood, and there may be more structure to primes than currently believed, which could either help or hinder the proof.
- The Twin Prime Conjecture's "conspiracy" is a hypothesis; alternative models or theories could potentially explain the distribution of twin primes without invoking such a "conspiracy."
- AI's role in mathematics is growing, but there may be unforeseen limitations or ethical considerations that could affect its integration into mathematical research.
- The claim that formalizing proofs with AI takes ten times longer than traditional methods may not hold as AI technology advances and becomes more efficient.
- AI's current lack of subtlety in advanced mathematical work could be a temporary limitation, with future advancements potentially overcoming this hurdle.
- Tao's vision for AI in enhancing mathematical experimentation and collaboration is optimistic, but it's important to consider that human intuition and creativity may still play irreplaceable roles in mathematical discovery.
Actionables
- You can cultivate an exploratory mindset by tackling complex problems in your daily life with curiosity rather than seeking immediate solutions. Start by identifying a problem area in your life, such as budgeting or time management, and approach it with the mindset of exploration. Break down the problem into smaller questions and hypothesize different outcomes without the pressure of finding a quick fix. This mirrors the exploratory approach to mathematical problems and can lead to innovative personal solutions.
- Enhance your understanding of randomness and structure by playing strategy games that involve both elements, like Settlers of Catan or Risk. These games require you to manage resources (structure) while dealing with the uncertainty of dice rolls and opponent moves (randomness). Reflect on your decision-making process during the game to better appreciate the balance between randomness and structure, akin to the challenges mathematicians face with conjectures involving prime numbers.
- Engage with AI in a hands-on way by using AI-powered tools to automate a task in your life, such as scheduling or content creation. For example, use an AI scheduling assistant to organize your appointments or an AI writing tool to draft emails or social media posts. This will give you a practical understanding of AI's capabilities and limitations, similar to how mathematicians are exploring AI's role in their field.
Related Shortform Content
Get access to the context and additional materials
Tao's Research on Challenging Mathematical Problems
Terence Tao, a renowned mathematician, has delved into some of the most complex mathematical problems like fluid dynamics, the Poincaré Conjecture, and the Collatz Conjecture. Through his work, Tao showcases immersive engagement with the unknown realms of mathematics.
Tao Works On Complex Math Problems Like Fluid Dynamics, the Poincare Conjecture, and the Collatz Conjecture
Tao approaches mathematical research with an exploration mentality, acknowledging that the path to solving complex problems is not always clear from the outset. His focus lies on unraveling the mysteries that govern the natural world, such as the formation of singularities in fluids and the behavior of numbers in speculative sequences.
Fluid Dynamics: Tao Studied Navier-Stokes Equation and "Blowup" Behavior, Linked To Stability and Predictability of Nonlinear Systems in Physics
Tao delves into fluid dynamics, studying the Navier-Stokes regularity problem, an unresolved mystery about whether water’s velocity fields can develop points of singularity with infinite velocity. The Navier-Stokes equations, essential for modeling incompressible fluids, play a vital role in various applications, including weather prediction. His interest lies in proving or disproving the possibility of "finite time blowup," a phenomenon where fluid energy might concentrate at a single point in finite time. By analyzing this, Tao connects the dots between energy conservation, viscosity, and their effects on the stability of fluids, providing insights into the predictability of nonlinear systems in physics.
Utilizing a modified version of the Navier-Stokes equations and a process of elimination, Tao works to direct fluid energy into smaller and smaller scales to engineer a blowup. His methodical experimentation with "forced blowups" uncovers which interactions must be considered when proving global regularity for Navier-Stokes equations, eventually identifying supercriticality as a key qualitative feature. This insight reveals why some equations within physics are more predictable than others.
Poincare Conjecture Solved by Grigori Perelman, Tao Explains New Methods Used For Singularities
While Tao does not work directly on the Poincaré Conjecture, he acknowledges the monumental achievement of Grigori Perelman in solving this problem. Perelman introduced new concepts like reduced volume and entropy to transition the problem from supercritical to critical, effectively simplifying the nonlinear aspects. By classifying potential singularities, Perelman was able to employ surgical methods to resolve them, ultimately solving the Poincaré Conjecture. Tao draws parallels between such mathematical singu ...
Here’s what you’ll find in our full summary
Tao's Research on Challenging Mathematical Problems
Additional Materials
Actionables
- You can explore the unpredictability of daily life by starting a "Chaos Journal" where you record unexpected events and try to find patterns or triggers. Just like the Collatz Conjecture generates unpredictable sequences, your journal can help you notice the randomness in your own life and how small changes can lead to different outcomes. For example, jot down an unexpected conversation and trace back what led to it, or note a surprising personal success and the factors that might have influenced it.
- Engage with the concept of iterative processes by creating a simple daily routine and slightly altering one variable each week to observe the effects. This mirrors the study of simple iterative processes in mathematics, where changing initial conditions can lead to complex outcomes. For instance, if you usually read before bed, change the genre of the book each week and note any differences in your sleep quality or morning alertness.
- Develop a better understanding of nonlinear systems by playing with simulation apps o ...
Related Shortform Content
Get access to the context and additional materials
The Difficulty Of Proving Famous Mathematical Conjectures
Understanding and proving conjectures in mathematics, particularly around the properties of prime numbers, has long been regarded as one of the most difficult pursuits in the field. Mathematician Terence Tao sheds light on the complexities that underlie these issues.
Balancing Structure and Randomness In Unsolved Math Problems
Famous conjectures such as the Riemann Hypothesis and the Twin Prime Conjecture present significant challenges in proving them due to a delicate balance between the apparent randomness of prime numbers and the potential underlying structure that they may follow.
Prime Distribution and Riemann Hypothesis's Challenges
Terence Tao speaks about the Riemann Hypothesis, suggesting that primes act as randomly as possible. This randomness is thought to be characterized by the phenomenon of square root cancellation. According to the hypothesis, prime numbers are expected to show diminishing fluctuations akin to randomness when sampled extensively, something captured by the Riemann zeta function.
Proving the Riemann Hypothesis faces the critical obstacle of demonstrating that primes exhibit true randomness, to the degree seen in actual random sets. Mathematics lacks the necessary tools to adequately capture this behavior. The parity problem further complicates matters, showing conventional techniques might be lacking. Tao mentions if the Riemann Hypothesis were false, it would significantly impact number theory and cryptography, as cryptographic security relies on the random behavior of primes.
Twin Prime Conjecture Suggests Infinite Prime Pairs Differing By 2, Resisting Proof due to Potential "Conspiracy-Like" Prime Structure Possibly Eliminating Twin Primes, Despite Primes Appearing Otherwise Random
The Twin Prime Conjecture is another puzzling problem that has perplexed mathematicians, including Tao during his undergraduate years. Twin primes, like the pair 11 and 13, become increasingly sparse as numbers get larger. Tao muses that there might be an underlying "conspiracy" in the prime number structure that prevents the existence of twin primes, despite their overall random appearance.
Strategies for proving the conjecture that relies on the natural occurrence of primes must also hold for artificially edited sets of primes that remove twin primes. There's a subtle structure within primes that, according to Tao, is not detectable through aggregate statistical methods. The Trim-Half Conjecture, testing if primes act randomly, still cannot overcome the idea of a structural elimination of twins.
Progress Requires Balancing Structure and Randomness, Tao Explains
To advance mathematical understanding of prime numbers, it's crucial to take into account the balance between the random and structured attributes of primes. The pigeonhole principle, although useful, must be adapted when applying to the distribution of primes. Almost primes act as useful tools for studying prime numbers, ...
Here’s what you’ll find in our full summary
The Difficulty Of Proving Famous Mathematical Conjectures
Additional Materials
Clarifications
- The parity problem in mathematics relates to the challenge of understanding and working with the even and odd properties of numbers within mathematical problems and conjectures. It involves investigating how the parity (evenness or oddness) of numbers impacts the behavior and relationships between them, often presenting obstacles in proving certain mathematical statements. Mathematicians encounter difficulties when dealing with problems that involve both addition and multiplication properties of numbers, such as in the case of the Twin Prime Conjecture, where the parity barrier complicates the analysis and proof process.
- Almost primes are numbers that are not prime themselves but have a special relationship with prime numbers. They are often products of two prime numbers, making them close to being prime. Studying almost primes can provide insights into the distribution and properties of prime numbers, helping mathematicians analyze prime number patterns and relationships. By examining almost primes alongside prime numbers, mathematicians can gain a deeper understanding of the structures and characteristics of prime numbers.
- The pigeonhole principle states that if you have more "pigeons" than "pigeonholes," at least one pigeonhole must contain more than one pigeon. In the context of prime number distribution, this principle is used to understand the clustering of prime numbers within certain intervals. It helps mathematicians analyze how prime numbers are distributed and can provide insights into patterns or gaps in the distribution of primes. The principle is a fundamental tool in combinatorics and number theory, aiding in the study of prime number behavior within different numerical ranges.
- The parity barrier in mathematics is a concept that arises when attempting to prove certain conjectures related to prime numbers, like the Twin Prime Conjecture. It suggests that the even and odd nature of numbers can complicate the analysis of prime number patterns and distributio ...
Counterarguments
- The notion that primes exhibit "true randomness" is a simplification; primes follow deterministic rules, and their distribution, while complex, is not random in the way that outcomes of coin tosses are.
- The impact of the falsity of the Riemann Hypothesis on cryptography might be overstated, as many cryptographic systems do not rely directly on the distribution of primes but rather on the difficulty of factoring large numbers or computing discrete logarithms.
- The idea of a "conspiracy" in the prime number structure is metaphorical and could be misleading; any perceived patterns or structures are a result of the inherent properties of numbers and not an actual conspiracy.
- The assertion that twin primes become sparser as numbers increase is not universally accepted; some mathematicians argue that our understanding of prime distribution at larger scales is still incomplete.
- The pigeonhole principle is a fundamental concept in combinatorics and its application to prime numbers is not necessarily limited or in need of adaptation; rather, it is the complexity of prime distribution that poses challenges.
- The parity problem is a significant obstacle in analytic number theory, but it is not insurmountable; new techniques and approaches may eventually bypass or resolve this issue.
- The cha ...
Related Shortform Content
Get access to the context and additional materials
The Intersection of Mathematics, Computers, and AI
Terence Tao, a highly respected mathematician, shares his insights into the evolving role of artificial intelligence (AI) in the realm of mathematics, particularly concerning proof languages like Lean. He envisions a future where AI will play a more significant experimental role in mathematics, akin to its contributions to refining chess strategies. Tao also anticipates advancements in AI that could potentially streamline the labor-intensive process of formalizing mathematical proofs.
Tao Explores AI-aided Transformations in Math via Proof Languages Like Lean
Proof Languages Offer Reliable Verification, but Formalizing Is Labor-Intensive
Tao discusses Lean, a proof assistant that not only executes code but also produces certificates with detailed proofs. He emphasizes that while Lean guarantees 100% correctness of arguments, conditional upon trust in Lean's compiler, formalizing proofs is currently a time-consuming process, roughly ten times longer than writing proofs by hand. This labor intensity is exemplified in the specifics, such as updating a constant from 12 to 11 in a formalized proof requiring substantial rework of the entire argument. Tao acknowledges challenges in defining mathematical objects in Lean and translating a body of basic facts, a process further complicated by the detail necessary for direct formalization.
Tao Perceives AI Potential in Lemma Search, Proof Strategies, and Conjecture Generation, yet Current Methods Lack Subtlety and Reliability for Advanced Math Work
Tao is intrigued by the efficiency AI tools introduce to his mathematical process, particularly in coding, which he can now perform much faster than before. He talks about the use of AI in searching for mathematical lemmas and proof strategies. However, he points out that AI currently lacks the subtlety and reliability required for more advanced work. AI, Tao explains, can sometimes successfully predict the next step in a proof but often provides unreliable suggestions.
Despite the potential of AI in generating meaningful mathematical conjectures, Tao humorously suggests AI needs a "graduate school" experience to learn from mistakes, recognizing the current struggles AI models face in rediscovering established theories due to a lack of diverse training data that includes non-successful mathematical explorations.
AI and Formal Proof Integration Could Transform Math Research Despite Challenges
Tao discusses the integration of AI and formal proofs, which he believes could revolutionize mathematical research despite current shortcomings. Lean and similar proof languages allow for a formalized blueprint of problems, contributing to grand-scale projects that would be unfeasible with pen and paper, and enabling collaborations with AI in both theoretical mathematics and practical application contexts.
Tao envisions that as the tools for formalization improve, the labor-intensive na ...
Here’s what you’ll find in our full summary
The Intersection of Mathematics, Computers, and AI
Additional Materials
Clarifications
- Proof languages like Lean are software tools used in mathematics to formalize and verify mathematical proofs. They provide a structured way to write down mathematical arguments in a language that a computer can understand. By using proof languages like Lean, mathematicians can ensure the correctness of their proofs and explore the potential for automation in the proof-writing process. These tools are designed to assist in creating rigorous and reliable mathematical proofs, contributing to advancements in mathematical research and the development of artificial intelligence applications in mathematics.
- Formalizing mathematical proofs involves translating mathematical arguments into a structured language that a computer can understand for verification. This process ensures the correctness of the proofs but can be labor-intensive due to the detailed nature of formalization. Challenges include defining mathematical objects precisely, translating basic facts accurately, and the need for meticulous detail in the formalization process. Updates or changes in formal proofs, even minor ones, often require significant rework of the entire argument, contributing to the time-consuming nature of formalization.
- In advanced mathematical work, AI currently struggles with subtlety and reliability, often providing unreliable suggestions and lacking the nuance required for complex proofs. AI's limitations include difficulties in scaling complex proofs and generating meaningful conjectures due to a lack of diverse training data that encompasses unsuccessful mathematical explorations. Despite advancements, significant human oversight is necessary as AI can produce nonsensical solutions, highlighting the need for continued development in AI's capabilities for advanced mathematical tasks.
- AI aiding in lemma search, proof strategies, and conjecture generation involves using artificial intelligence algorithms to assist mathematicians in finding supporting theorems (lemmas), devising effective approaches to proving mathematical statements (proof strategies), and proposing new hypotheses or statements to explore (conjecture generation). These AI tools can help mathematicians navigate complex problems by suggesting potential paths to follow, identifying relevant supporting evidence, and even proposing new directions for research based on patterns and data analysis. The goal is to enhance the efficiency and effectiveness of mathematical exploration and problem-solving by leveraging AI's computational capabilities to complement human reasoning and creativity in mathematical research.
- To improve its performance, AI needs diverse training data that includes a wide range of examples, including unsuccessful cases, to learn effectively. This variety helps AI models understand the nuances and complexities of different scenarios, leading to more robust and accurate predictions. Without diverse training data, AI may struggle to generalize well beyond the specific cases it has been exposed to, limiting its ability to handle new or challenging situations effectively. In essence, diverse training data acts as a rich source of information that enables AI systems to adapt and make informed decisions across ...
Counterarguments
- While Lean guarantees 100% correctness given trust in its compiler, it's important to note that any software may contain bugs, so absolute trust in a proof assistant may be misplaced until it has been extensively validated.
- The time-consuming nature of formalizing proofs in Lean might not necessarily decrease with improved tools; as mathematics becomes more complex, the formalization process could also become more intricate.
- AI's current lack of subtlety and reliability in advanced mathematical work suggests that human intuition and creativity are still crucial in mathematics, and AI may not be able to fully replicate these human attributes.
- The idea that AI needs "graduate school" experience could be seen as anthropomorphizing AI; instead, it may be more accurate to say that AI requires more sophisticated algorithms and data sets.
- The integration of AI and formal proofs, while potentially transformative, may also lead to an over-reliance on technology, which could detract from the development of mathematical intuition and understanding.
- The suggestion that journals might focus on the significance of research formalized in Lean rather than correctness could undermine the traditional peer review process, which evaluates both the significance and the correctness of the work.
- The potential for AI to contribute to research papers and collaborations in mathematics does not guarantee that the contributions will always be beneficial or that AI-generated results will be accepted by the mathematical community without skepticism.
- The anticipation of ...
Related Shortform Content
Get access to the context and additional materials
Create Summaries for anything on the web
Download the Shortform Chrome extension for your browser
