Podcasts > Last Podcast On The Left > Episode 573: Ed and Lorraine Warren Part I - Go Get Me The Book!

Episode 573: Ed and Lorraine Warren Part I - Go Get Me The Book!

By Marcus Parks, Henry Zebrowski

The infamous Ed and Lorraine Warren, self-proclaimed paranormal investigators, take center stage in this episode exploring their background and controversial exploits. Details are provided on their devout Catholic upbringings and early claims of supernatural experiences that fueled their careers.

The episode delves into the Perron family haunting, the inspiration for the film "The Conjuring," and scrutinizes the Warrens' methods and beliefs about demonic possessions. Skepticism surrounding their credibility is also examined, with discussions on whether they embellished paranormal stories for profit and religious ideology.

Listen to the original

Episode 573: Ed and Lorraine Warren Part I - Go Get Me The Book!

This is a preview of the Shortform summary of the May 17, 2024 episode of the Last Podcast On The Left

Sign up for Shortform to access the whole episode summary along with additional materials like counterarguments and context.

Episode 573: Ed and Lorraine Warren Part I - Go Get Me The Book!

1-Page Summary

The Background and Early Career of Paranormal Investigators Ed and Lorraine Warren

Ed and Lorraine Warren, renowned paranormal investigators, had devout Catholic upbringings that deeply influenced their beliefs and life's work. Ed's father was extremely religious, instilling values like bequeathing his estate to the church rather than family. Lorraine came from a similarly fervent Catholic family nearby.

From a young age, Ed claimed to experience the paranormal, including seeing the ghost of a former landlady at age five. He also had recurring dreams about a nun prophesying his destiny as a demonologist. The Warrens used their artistic talents to begin investigating haunted houses, founding the New England Society for Psychic Research in 1952 to gain credibility.

The Perron Family Haunting That Inspired 'The Conjuring'

In 1970, the Perron family moved into an old Rhode Island home and began experiencing disturbing paranormal activity, from disembodied cries to physical attacks. Carolyn Perron traced this to the legend of Bathsheba Sherman, supposedly a witch accused of murder and satanic rituals.

The Warrens were called in but failed to end the haunting. The film 'The Conjuring' exaggerated their role and Bathsheba's backstory. Later investigation found Bathsheba was likely an ordinary woman, not a satanic witch as portrayed.

The Warrens' Paranormal Methods and Beliefs

The Warrens claimed to use vague "three sensitivities" to detect hauntings or possessions, relying on personal feelings. They believed in a hierarchy from "infestation" to "oppression" to "possession", often fitting evidence to these preconceived notions.

Henry Zebrowski humorously refers to the Warrens' consistent application of this model. They also blamed victims for "inviting" paranormal forces through activities like playing Dungeons & Dragons.

Skepticism Around the Warrens' Credibility

While portrayed as heroes in films, Marcus Parks and Henry Zebrowski suggest the Warrens were skilled self-promoters who capitalized on paranormal fascination, potentially embellishing or fabricating stories for profit and Christian ideology.

Skeptical groups found many of the Warrens' famous cases contained falsehoods or questionable evidence. The Warrens refused independent analysis, guarding evidence jealously. Overall, their legacy and credibility remain clouded by doubts about honesty and practices.

1-Page Summary

Additional Materials

Clarifications

  • The Warrens claimed to possess three sensitivities that helped them detect hauntings or possessions. These sensitivities were based on personal feelings and intuition rather than scientific methods. They believed in a progression from "infestation" to "oppression" to "possession" when dealing with paranormal phenomena. However, their approach was often criticized for lacking empirical evidence and scientific rigor.
  • The hierarchy of paranormal activity from "infestation" to "oppression" to "possession" is a concept often used in paranormal investigations to categorize the severity of supernatural disturbances. "Infestation" typically involves minor occurrences like unexplained noises or objects moving. "Oppression" signifies more intense activity, such as physical harm or psychological torment experienced by individuals. "Possession" is the most severe stage, where a person is believed to be taken over or controlled by a malevolent entity.
  • Marcus Parks and Henry Zebrowski are hosts of the podcast "The Last Podcast on the Left," known for their humorous and critical approach to paranormal topics. They have expressed skepticism about the credibility of Ed and Lorraine Warren, suggesting that the Warrens may have exaggerated or fabricated stories for personal gain and to promote their Christian beliefs. Parks and Zebrowski question the authenticity of the Warrens' investigations and the evidence they presented, highlighting inconsistencies and potential motivations behind their actions. Their perspectives contribute to a broader conversation about the Warrens' legacy and the skepticism surrounding their work in the paranormal field.
  • Skeptical groups have raised concerns about the credibility of the Warrens' famous cases, suggesting that some of the evidence presented by the Warrens may be questionable or misleading. These groups have pointed out inconsistencies and lack of verifiable proof in the investigations conducted by Ed and Lorraine Warren. The Warrens' reluctance to allow independent analysis of their findings has also contributed to doubts about the accuracy and authenticity of their claims. Overall, skepticism surrounding the Warrens' famous cases stems from a lack of transparency and verifiable evidence in their paranormal investigations.
  • The Warrens' refusal of independent analysis of their cases means they did not allow outside experts or researchers to scrutinize their investigations or evidence. This lack of external review raised concerns about the credibility and objectivity of their findings. By keeping their work insulated from independent scrutiny, the Warrens' methods and conclusions were not subject to validation or verification by impartial parties. This approach contributed to skepticism and doubts about the accuracy and authenticity of their paranormal claims.

Counterarguments

  • The Warrens' devout Catholic upbringing could be seen as a strong moral foundation, rather than a bias influencing their work.
  • Personal experiences with the paranormal, while subjective, can be compelling to those who have had similar experiences and should not be dismissed outright without investigation.
  • The founding of the New England Society for Psychic Research could be interpreted as an attempt to formalize and bring rigor to the field of paranormal investigation.
  • The experiences of the Perron family, regardless of the historical accuracy of Bathsheba Sherman's story, were real to them and may not be easily explained.
  • The film 'The Conjuring' is a work of entertainment and not a documentary; artistic license is expected in such works.
  • The "three sensitivities" and the hierarchy of paranormal activity could be seen as a framework for understanding complex phenomena that are not yet fully understood by science.
  • Blaming victims for "inviting" paranormal forces could be a way to explain why some people are more susceptible to such experiences than others.
  • Self-promotion in the field of paranormal investigation does not necessarily negate the sincerity of the Warrens' beliefs or the validity of their experiences.
  • Skepticism is healthy in any field, but it should not lead to the outright dismissal of phenomena that may have yet to be explained by current scientific understanding.
  • Refusing independent analysis could be due to concerns over the misinterpretation or mishandling of sensitive or personal evidence related to their cases.

Get access to the context and additional materials

So you can understand the full picture and form your own opinion.
Get access for free
Episode 573: Ed and Lorraine Warren Part I - Go Get Me The Book!

The background and early career of paranormal investigators Ed and Lorraine Warren

Ed and Lorraine Warren are renowned figures in the realm of paranormal investigation, their fervent Catholic upbringing deeply influencing their life's work.

Ed and Lorraine Warren came from very Catholic families, which profoundly shaped their beliefs and careers.

Ed Warren was known for his devout Catholicism, which was instilled in him from a young age. His father attended mass every day, demonstrating the family's religious dedication. This devoutness was reflected in how Ed Warren's father bequeathed most of his estate to the local Catholic diocese after his death, funding a new stained glass window rather than leaving it to his family.

In the backdrop of such strong Catholic values, Lorraine Moran, growing up just three blocks away from Ed, met him in 1944. Lorraine caught Ed's attention while he worked as an usher at a local theater. They married a year later, in 1945, forging a partnership that would become legendary in paranormal circles.

Ed Warren claimed to have had paranormal experiences from a young age, including a formative encounter with the ghost of an old landlady.

Ed's interest in the supernatural emerged early when he claimed to have seen an apparition of his deceased, spinster landlady at the young age of five. He described witnessing a small light in his closet that transformed into the transparent, scowling figure of the old woman.

This childhood encounter with the paranormal was not an isolated event. Ed often recounted a recurring dream involving a nun who prophesied that he would guide many priests but was not destined to become one himself. He interpreted this as a divine sign of his future career as a demonologist—a vocation he felt was sanctioned by the Catholic Church.

Ed and Lorraine Warren began their paranormal investigation business in the late 1940s and early 1950s, using their artistic skills to sketch haunted houses.

After marrying, Ed and Lorraine Warren combined their talents and devout backgrounds to launch a unique venture into in ...

Here’s what you’ll find in our full summary

Registered users get access to the Full Podcast Summary and Additional Materials. It’s easy and free!
Start your free trial today

The background and early career of paranormal investigators Ed and Lorraine Warren

Additional Materials

Clarifications

  • Ed Warren claimed to have had paranormal experiences from a young age, including seeing the ghost of his deceased landlady at five years old. He also mentioned a recurring dream involving a nun who prophesied his future as a demonologist. These experiences influenced his belief in the supernatural and his career path in paranormal investigation.
  • Ed Warren's recurring dream about a nun who prophesied his future role as a demonologist was significant because it symbolized his calling to work in the paranormal field. The nun's prediction that he would guide priests but not become one himself indicated a unique path for Ed. This dream served as a formative experience that shaped his belief in his mission to combat demonic forces. The nun's appearance in his dreams was interpreted by Ed as a divine message guiding him towards his life's work.
  • The skepticism surrounding the Warrens' work stemmed from the questionable nature of the evidence they presented to support their claims of paranormal activity. This evidence often included eyewitness testimonies, photographs, audio recordings, and physic ...

Counterarguments

  • The influence of the Warrens' Catholic upbringing on their work could be seen as subjective and may not be the sole reason for their career choices; other factors could have contributed to their interest in the paranormal.
  • The claim that Ed Warren's father's religious dedication was reflected in his actions, such as donating to the church rather than leaving an inheritance to his family, could be criticized for not considering the personal motivations or broader context of his decision.
  • The meeting and marriage of Lorraine Moran and Ed Warren are factual events, but the significance placed on their partnership in the context of their work could be overstated or romanticized.
  • Ed Warren's claims of paranormal experiences from a young age and encounters with ghosts are anecdotal and cannot be independently verified, which opens them to skepticism.
  • The recurring dream involving a nun that Ed Warren described could be interpreted in various ways and does not necessarily indicate a divine sign or a predetermined career path.
  • The Warrens' start of their paranormal investigation business and their use of artistic skills to sketch haunted houses could be criticized for lacking scientific rigor or for potenti ...

Get access to the context and additional materials

So you can understand the full picture and form your own opinion.
Get access for free
Episode 573: Ed and Lorraine Warren Part I - Go Get Me The Book!

The Warrens' involvement in the Perron family haunting case, which was the basis for The Conjuring movie

The Perron family's experiences with paranormal activity in their Rhode Island home and the involvement of paranormal investigators Ed and Lorraine Warren became the inspiration for the horror film "The Conjuring". However, the reality of the Warrens' roles and the history of the property's previous inhabitant, Bathsheba Sherman, have come into question.

The Perron family moved into a centuries-old Rhode Island home in 1970 and immediately experienced a variety of paranormal activity.

In December of 1970, Roger and Carolyn Perron, accompanied by their five daughters, moved into a large home near Harrisville, Rhode Island, known as the Arnold Estate. Upon moving in, the previous owner cryptically advised them to keep the lights on at night. The family quickly encountered weird phenomena, including disembodied cries, banging doors, a cold and smelly apparition, spectral torches, and a humming house. Early on, the spirits, such as former residents Mrs. Arnold and Johnny Arnold, were relatively benign; Mrs. Arnold would affectionately tuck the girls in, while Johnny would play with their toys.

However, the haunting soon turned violent, with the family experiencing physical attacks, apparitions, and other disturbing phenomena.

The atmosphere in the home darkened considerably with occurrences of beds lifting, with occupants dropped onto the floor, and Roger covered in scratches after an encounter with an apparition. A grotesque figure with fangs even approached Roger and kissed him, leaving the room thick with acrid smoke.

Carolyn Perron eventually traced the home's history and discovered the story of Bathsheba Sherman, a supposed witch who had lived on neighboring property.

Carolyn's research at local libraries unearthed the legend of Bathsheba Sherman, establishing her as a central figure in the home's troubled past. Folklore surrounding Bathsheba included allegations of her committing infant sacrifice, engaging in satanic rituals, and being outcast after accusations of murder against her baby. Although no definitive evidence supported these claims, they formed the basis of the Perrons' and the Warrens' description of the haunting.

Bathsheba's backstory as told by the Warrens and the Perrons involved satanic rituals, infant sacrifice, and a supernaturally preserved corpse.

The narrative accuses Bathsheba of murdering her baby with a sewing needle in the name of Satan, which is eerily reminiscent of the puncture wound Carolyn suffered during a spectral attack. Furthermore, it was rumored that Bathsheba's body had turned to stone upon her death—interpreted as Satan's payment for beauty.

Despite the Warrens' involvement, the Perron family continued to experience paranormal activity for a decade before finally relocating to Georgia.

The Warrens determined that the home was under Bathsheba's demonic influence, but their involvement, including an attempted séance that resulted in Roger ejecting Ed Warren from their house, failed to end the disturbances. It t ...

Here’s what you’ll find in our full summary

Registered users get access to the Full Podcast Summary and Additional Materials. It’s easy and free!
Start your free trial today

The Warrens' involvement in the Perron family haunting case, which was the basis for The Conjuring movie

Additional Materials

Clarifications

  • Ed and Lorraine Warren were renowned paranormal investigators who gained fame for their involvement in various high-profile cases, including the Perron family haunting. They were known for their work in documenting and researching supernatural phenomena, often offering their services to families experiencing hauntings or disturbances. The Warrens believed in the existence of spirits and demons and dedicated their lives to investigating and assisting those affected by such occurrences. Their methods included conducting séances, exorcisms, and providing support and guidance to individuals dealing with paranormal events.
  • The Perron family experienced a range of paranormal activities in their Rhode Island home, including disembodied cries, banging doors, spectral torches, and physical attacks like beds lifting and occupants being dropped. They encountered benign spirits initially, such as former residents Mrs. Arnold and Johnny Arnold, who interacted with the children. However, the haunting escalated with violent occurrences like Roger being covered in scratches, encountering a grotesque figure, and experiencing a spectral attack that left Carolyn with a puncture wound.
  • Bathsheba Sherman was a figure associated with the Perron family haunting case, known for her dark legend of alleged witchcraft and sinister deeds. The Warrens and the Perron family linked her to the paranormal disturbances in their Rhode Island home, attributing acts like infant sacrifice and involvement in satanic rituals to her. However, subsequent investigations revealed that the historical accounts of Bathsheba's life ...

Counterarguments

  • The experiences of the Perron family and the involvement of the Warrens have not been independently verified and rely heavily on personal testimonies, which can be subjective and prone to embellishment.
  • The historical accuracy of the events depicted in "The Conjuring" is questionable, as the film was created for entertainment purposes and may not reflect the true nature of the Perron family's experiences.
  • The story of Bathsheba Sherman has been scrutinized by historians, and the lack of evidence for the more sensational aspects of her life suggests that the narrative could be a result of folklore rather than fact.
  • The Warrens' methods and conclusions in paranormal investigations have been criticized by skeptics and members of the scientific community for lacking empirical evidence and not adhering to scientific methodologies.
  • The portrayal of Bathsheba Sherman as a witch involved in satanic rituals could be seen as defamatory to her memory, especially given the lack of historical evidence to support such claims.
  • The effectiveness of the Warrens' interventions in cases like the Perron family's is debatable, as the supposed hauntings often continued despite their involvement.
  • The claim ...

Get access to the context and additional materials

So you can understand the full picture and form your own opinion.
Get access for free
Episode 573: Ed and Lorraine Warren Part I - Go Get Me The Book!

The Warrens' Paranormal Investigation Methods and Beliefs, Including Their Concept of "Three Sensitivities"

The Warrens, a well-known paranormal investigator couple, have constructed a unique methodology and set of beliefs to deal with ghostly and demonic presences.

The Warrens claimed to use "three sensitivities" to determine if a location was haunted or a person possessed.

These "sensitivities" were vague and subjective, involving the Warrens' personal feelings and interpretations rather than verifiable evidence.

When Ed and Lorraine Warren investigated a haunted location, they relied on what they called the 'three sensitivities.' If a location exhibited all three sensitivities, they deemed that sufficient to declare a location haunted or a person possessed. The Warrens' methods, such as whether Ed and Lorraine were 'vibing with the scene,' were subjective, unverifiable by outside sources, and based on personal feelings. For example, Ed Warren described witnessing bluish orbs which he interpreted as the spirit extracting electromagnetic energy from a person’s aura—considered a "ghost" if it displayed human features.

The Warrens also claimed to have extensive photographic and video evidence, but it was often dismissed as easily explainable phenomena.

A large part of their reputation was built on supposedly extensive photographic and video evidence that they gathered during their investigations. However, this evidence frequently came under scrutiny and was often dismissed by critics as easily explainable natural phenomena or artifacts of the recording technology.

The Warrens believed in a specific hierarchy and progression of demonic activity, from "infestation" to "oppression" to "possession."

This allowed them to constantly reframe cases to match their preconceived beliefs, ignoring contradictory evidence.

Marcus Parks talks about the Warrens’ belief in stages of demonic manifestation, specifically the oppression stage before a demon becomes fully apparent. The Warrens’ structured methodology for categorizing paranormal encounters often allowed them to fit the phenomenon into a preexisting framework of infestation ...

Here’s what you’ll find in our full summary

Registered users get access to the Full Podcast Summary and Additional Materials. It’s easy and free!
Start your free trial today

The Warrens' Paranormal Investigation Methods and Beliefs, Including Their Concept of "Three Sensitivities"

Additional Materials

Clarifications

  • The "three sensitivities" used by the Warrens were subjective criteria they relied on to determine if a location was haunted or a person was possessed. These sensitivities were based on the personal feelings and interpretations of Ed and Lorraine Warren rather than concrete, verifiable evidence. The Warrens believed that if a location exhibited all three sensitivities, it was enough to declare it haunted or a person possessed, even though these criteria were not objectively measurable.
  • The dismissal of the Warrens' photographic and video evidence as explainable phenomena stems from skepticism regarding the quality and credibility of their documentation. Critics often point out flaws in the evidence, such as lens flares, dust particles, or camera artifacts, which can be mistaken for paranormal activity. This skepticism is fueled by the lack of verifiable and scientifically sound methods used by the Warrens in capturing and presenting their evidence. The Warrens' reliance on subjective interpretations and their tendency to jump to supernatural conclusions without thorough investigation also contribute to the skepticism surrounding their photographic and video evidence.
  • The Warrens believed in a structured progression of demonic activity stages, which included "infestation," "oppression," and "possession." They categorized paranormal encounters based on these stages, with infestation being the initial signs of a haunting, oppression involving a more intense and malevolent presence, and possession being the ultimate stage where a demon takes control of a person. This hierarchy allowed the Warrens to interpret and address paranormal phenomena within a framework that they believed helped them understand and combat demonic forces.
  • The Warrens had a structured belief system about demonic activity, which they applied to cases they investigated. They tended to interpret paranormal encounters within the framework of their preconceived stages of infestation, oppression, and possession, sometimes overlooking evidence that contradicted their beliefs. This approach allowed them to consistently fit phenomena into their established model, even if it didn't align perfectly with the actual circumstances of a case.
  • The Warrens believed in a structured hierarchy of demonic ...

Counterarguments

  • The "three sensitivities" are not based on empirical evidence and lack scientific validation, which is a fundamental principle in establishing the credibility of any investigative method.
  • Personal interpretations of phenomena like bluish orbs are highly subjective and can be influenced by a variety of psychological factors, including pareidolia, where the mind perceives familiar patterns where none exist.
  • Photographic and video evidence can be prone to misinterpretation and may not be reliable without proper controls and understanding of the technology used, including the potential for photographic anomalies due to lighting, lens flares, and other technical issues.
  • The Warrens' structured methodology of demonic activity stages lacks support from the broader scientific and psychological communities, which generally do not recognize demonic possession as a valid diagnosis or phenomenon.
  • The approach of fitting phenomena into a preexisting framework without considering contradictory evidence can lead to confirmation bias, where one only acknowledges information that supports their beliefs and ignores evidence to ...

Get access to the context and additional materials

So you can understand the full picture and form your own opinion.
Get access for free
Episode 573: Ed and Lorraine Warren Part I - Go Get Me The Book!

Skepticism and scrutiny around the credibility of the Warrens and their paranormal claims

The credibility of Ed and Lorraine Warren, famous paranormal investigators, has been called into question by skeptics who view them as adept self-promoters and storytellers, as well as potentially dishonest or manipulative figures.

While the Warrens were portrayed as Christian superheroes in The Conjuring films, outside investigations have depicted them as more complex and questionable figures.

Marcus Parks and Henry Zebrowski explore the contrast between the Warrens' cinematic depiction and their real-life actions. Despite being portrayed as almost saintly figures in "The Conjuring" movie franchise, they are revealed to have been both devout Catholics and potentially cynical scammers. Furthermore, Zebrowski considers the possibility of Ed Warren being a sexual predator, with allegations that Lorraine Warren enabled his alleged sexual misconduct for many years. Parks compares the Warrens to a Bigfoot hunter who may begin with a genuine encounter but then feels compelled to exaggerate or fabricate subsequent evidence. Parks mentions that the Warrens, renowned during the '70s and '80s, capitalized on the era's growing infatuation with the paranormal by monetizing haunting stories.

The Warrens were adept self-promoters and storytellers who capitalized on the public's growing fascination with the paranormal.

The hosts discuss how the Warrens inserted themselves into infamous hauntings and had a keen sense for packaging their narratives for public consumption. Despite this, they were considered by many to be nice and genuinely sincere people.

However, they were also accused of embellishing, fabricating, or misinterpreting evidence to fit their own beliefs and financial interests.

Parks and Zebrowski suggest that the Warrens created and embellished their stories to push their Christian agenda and earn a living, with some people alleging that the Warrens would openly talk about enhancing stories to sell more books. They required a belief in the Christian God to understand their research, which implies a reliance on belief rather than empirical evidence.

Skeptical groups like the New England Skeptical Society attempted to analyze the Warrens' evidence and methods, often finding them lacking.

The New England Society for Skeptical Inquiry (NESS) found that the Warrens often had more stories than proof and maintained tight control over their paranormal evidence, preventing independent analysis.

The Warrens refused to allow independent analysis of much of their "evidence," maintaining tight control over their paranormal claims.

HEN the New England Skeptical Society prepared to feature the Warrens in an article, investi ...

Here’s what you’ll find in our full summary

Registered users get access to the Full Podcast Summary and Additional Materials. It’s easy and free!
Start your free trial today

Skepticism and scrutiny around the credibility of the Warrens and their paranormal claims

Additional Materials

Clarifications

  • Marcus Parks and Henry Zebrowski are hosts of a popular podcast called "The Last Podcast on the Left," where they discuss various topics including true crime, conspiracy theories, and the paranormal. They are known for their humorous and irreverent approach to dark subject matter. Parks often researches and presents the factual information, while Zebrowski adds comedic commentary and impressions to the discussions. Their dynamic and contrasting styles have garnered a large following among fans of the macabre and mysterious.
  • The Warrens claimed involvement in famous paranormal cases like Annabelle the doll, the Amityville horror, and the Perron haunting. However, investigations and skeptical groups have found significant inaccuracies, embellishments, and fabrications in the Warrens' retelling of these cases. Their level of actual involvement and the accuracy of their accounts have been called into question by critics and skeptics.
  • The New England Skeptical Society (NESS) is a skeptical organization that critically examines paranormal claims. NESS investigators, like Perry DeAngelis and Steve Novella, analyzed the evidence and methods of paranormal figures like Ed and Lorraine Warren. They found discrepancies in the Warrens' evidence and noted their reluctance to allow independent scrutiny, raising doubts about the credibility of the Warrens' paranormal investigations.
  • The Warrens were criticized for not allowing independent scrutiny of their paranormal evidence, which raised suspicions about the authenticity of their claims. Skeptical groups like the New England Skeptical Society found that the Warrens tightly controlled access to their evidence, hindering unbiased analysis. This lack of transparency fueled doubts about the credibility of their investigation ...

Counterarguments

  • The Warrens' refusal to allow independent analysis of their evidence could be seen as a desire to protect the privacy of those involved in their cases or to maintain the integrity of sensitive materials.
  • The portrayal of the Warrens in The Conjuring films, while dramatized, could be based on the positive impact they had on the lives of those they helped, rather than an attempt to mislead the public.
  • The Warrens' self-promotion and storytelling could be interpreted as a means to educate the public about the paranormal, which they may have genuinely believed in, rather than purely for personal gain.
  • Accusations of embellishing or fabricating evidence could be challenged by the subjective nature of paranormal investigation, where different interpretations of unexplained phenomena are common.
  • Skeptical groups often approach paranormal claims with a bias towards disbelief, which could affect their analysis of the Warrens' evidence and met ...

Get access to the context and additional materials

So you can understand the full picture and form your own opinion.
Get access for free

Create Summaries for anything on the web

Download the Shortform Chrome extension for your browser

Shortform Extension CTA