In this episode of I Will Teach You To Be Rich, financial advisor Ramit Sethi works with a couple facing severe financial challenges, including over $768,000 in total debt and monthly expenses that exceed their income by 68%. The situation is further complicated by trust issues stemming from concealed business debt and poor financial communication between the partners.
The episode covers the couple's plan to address their financial crisis through increased transparency and new income streams. Sethi outlines specific recommendations, including implementing weekly financial reports and avoiding additional debt. The couple develops action steps, with one partner pursuing a new career as a nail technician while the other explores business opportunities to boost their income.

Sign up for Shortform to access the whole episode summary along with additional materials like counterarguments and context.
A couple, Amy and John, are struggling with a staggering $768,181 in total debt, including a $514,000 mortgage, $100,000 in tax debt, and various other obligations. Their financial advisor, Ramit Sethi, points out that their fixed costs represent 168% of their income, meaning they're overspending by 68% each month. With only $2,160 in savings, the family is extremely vulnerable to financial emergencies.
The situation is complicated by what Amy calls "financial infidelity." John had concealed significant business debt for nearly two years, which only came to light when the CRA contacted him. The discovery has severely damaged their relationship, with Amy feeling betrayed and John feeling defensive. The couple's communication about finances has broken down, as evidenced by Amy applying for a Tesla loan without knowing their true financial situation.
Ramit Sethi emphasizes the need for immediate and decisive financial changes. He recommends implementing a weekly financial transparency report where John details big checks and expense allocations by Friday night for Amy's review on Saturday. Ramit warns against taking on new debt, calling it "kryptonite," and encourages the couple to be honest about their situation and take drastic action to address it.
The couple has developed a concrete plan for improvement. Amy is training to become a nail technician, aiming to earn $3,000 monthly, with a six-month deadline to evaluate the business's success. Meanwhile, John is exploring additional income opportunities, including renting out his shop space for $700 monthly and pursuing an $80,000 contract that would require longer work hours. To support this, Amy has agreed to handle more domestic responsibilities while John focuses on increasing their income during weekdays.
1-Page Summary
A couple, Amy and John, faces a dire financial situation with overwhelming debt and unsustainable expenses that are causing significant strain on their familial and romantic relationships.
Amy and John are in a combined $400,000 of debt, excluding their mortgage or car loan. Their total debt is staggering at $768,181, with a breakdown as follows:
Their monthly debt payments come to $5,888, which is over half of their take-home pay. John mentions falling behind on payments for source deductions that he was responsible for as an employer.
The couple's financial advisor, Ramit Sethi, has pointed out that their fixed costs represent an astonishing 168% of their income, meaning they are overspending by 68% each month. This causes them to incur more credit card debt to cover day-to-day expenses. The fixed costs alone explain their financial hardship, where they are essentially spending $4,190 more than what they earn every month.
When Amy's income is factored in at a modest $1,000, their situation remains dire with fixed costs still amounting to 126%. Their already unsustainable situation is worsened with actual debt payments reaching around 151% of their take-home pay, which Ramit describes as an unsustainable financial condition.
Amy and John's savings amount to a mere $2,160, which is drastically low, especially considering they are a family with children. This leaves them vulnerable, one emergency away from potential disaster such as losing their home or their children having to leave their schools.
Couple's Financial Situation and Debt Severity
The conversation between Amy and John hinges on the lack of financial transparency and communication, which has led to significant relationship strain.
Amy, Caller #1, did not know the full extent of their debt until the CRA contacted John. His business, started before their relationship and one which Amy had no involvement in, had accumulated significant debt. When John eventually disclosed this to Amy, she felt defeated and wanted the business gone. John himself was ashamed and felt defeated, having tried to manage the debt, which he had plans to tackle with upcoming big jobs, but his last backup plan failed.
Amy recalls that detailed communication about the implications of the debt on their personal finances was lacking when John stopped taking home an income. This suggests a pattern of poor financial communication, as evidenced by the couple's frequent financial situation talks, which lack clarity and mutual understanding.
John admits he was scared and tried to handle the debt alone, which eroded Amy's trust. This resulted in a unilateral decision-making process, as illustrated by Amy applying for a car loan under the assumption that they were financially stable, only to discover the hidden debt while driving a new Tesla.
Amy refers to the situation as a case of "financial infidelity," indicating a deliberate concealment of debt for 18 months to two years. This greatly damaged the trust in their relationship, with Amy feeling humiliated and angry about the situation. John, on the other hand, feels as though he is being painted as the "enemy" and admits to significant mistakes with the business financials but highlights that not all details have been accurately addressed.
The term "financial infidelity" is used by Amy to describe how the hidden debt has affected their relationship. She explains that this secret has turned what was believed to be a strong financial standing into ...
Financial Trust and Communication Breakdown in Relationship
Ramit Sethi is advocating for immediate and decisive financial changes for John and Amy, emphasizing honest discussions and drastic action to address their strained situation.
Ramit Sethi indicates that John and Amy need to make immediate financial changes, suggesting the situation's gravity requires quick and drastic action. He prompts John to acknowledge the significant debt accumulated, implying that honest conversations and significant actions are necessary to resolve their issues. Ramit states, "Bad news in the short term is good news in the long term," pointing to the urgent need to alter their financial situation drastically.
Ramit underscores the couple's unsustainable financial state, noting that they spend more than they make every month. He questions the couple about their plan for addressing secret debts and their overall financial health. Ramit Sethi also advises John to consider significant changes, such as selling their home to save money, and applauds the couple's joint discussion regarding financial and work-related changes.
Ramit Sethi emphasizes the need for a specific transparency report, updated weekly, where John will explain big checks, how the money will be divided, and that expensive purchases will be discussed between the partners. He suggests a structured approach where Amy reviews a financial document every Saturday that John prepares by Friday night, following a detailed template.
Additionally, Ramit notes the benefit of involving family support, specifically emphasizing being super specific about what they need from John's parents to ma ...
Ramit's Advice and Recommendations for the Couple
The couple has laid out a plan that hinges on both of them taking on different roles, with the wife aiming to become a nail technician for a new source of income and the husband seeking to expand his business opportunities.
Caller #1, the wife, has enrolled in a nail tech program and is conducting it at home, working around the children's schedules. She anticipates that once the kids are back in school, she will be able to dedicate more time to the program. Her goal is to open a nail studio, and she has estimated, after discussions with others in the field, that she could potentially net an income of $3,000 per month. The couple also has considered how the wife's new income might impact their fixed costs, with Ramit suggesting that they adjust her projected take-home income in their financial planning tool to help evaluate the impact of potential income changes.
The couple has agreed upon a deadline to assess the success of the wife's nail studio business. They are comfortable with a six-month period to establish significant clientele and income. Should progress not meet their expectations, they plan to reconsider and make changes.
The husband is exploring additional opportunities to increase his take-home income by renting out space at his shop, which could potentially earn them an additional $700 a month. He is also considering taking on extra work, such as a new job before Christmas that could be worth $80,000. Although this venture could require working 12-hour days, he is open to the possibility for the short-term boost in income but is cautious about the impacts suc ...
Specific Action Steps the Couple Plans to Take
Download the Shortform Chrome extension for your browser
