In this episode of the Huberman Lab, Dr. Christopher Gardner joins Andrew Huberman to explore how different dietary patterns affect human health. The discussion examines why there's no single "best" diet for everyone, how genetics influence individual responses to different foods, and common misconceptions about protein requirements. They also address the roles of fiber and fermented foods in gut health.
The conversation extends to the challenges posed by modern processed foods and potential solutions for improving their quality through industry collaboration. Gardner shares insights from his research on fermented foods and gut microbiome diversity, while explaining the complexities of conducting nutrition studies and communicating scientific findings to the public in an accurate way.
Sign up for Shortform to access the whole episode summary along with additional materials like counterarguments and context.
In their discussion, Andrew Huberman and Christopher Gardner emphasize that there's no universally "best" diet, as humans can thrive on various dietary patterns. Gardner advocates for a whole food, plant-based approach that can include animal products, while noting that indigenous populations have historically thrived on vastly different diets. However, both agree that modern processed foods pose significant health challenges compared to traditional diets.
Gardner explains that genetic factors, including [restricted term] resistance and specific genetic markers (SNPs), can influence how individuals respond to different dietary patterns. He also discusses how genetic adaptations, such as lactase persistence in Northern Europeans, affect dietary tolerances.
Gardner challenges common misconceptions about protein requirements and quality. He explains that the recommended daily allowance includes a significant safety margin, and the body has limited capacity to store excess protein. Contrary to popular belief, Gardner demonstrates that plant proteins contain all essential amino acids and, when properly combined, can provide protein quality comparable to animal sources.
Huberman and Gardner discuss the harmful effects of processed foods, highlighting concerns about additives, colorants, and preservatives. Gardner advocates for collaboration with the food industry to improve processed food quality, citing Beyond Meat's willingness to reformulate products based on health research. He also describes successful initiatives like Menus of Change, where chefs create healthy, sustainable meals in institutional settings.
While fiber is crucial for health, Gardner notes that individual tolerance varies based on gut microbiome diversity. A significant finding reveals that fermented foods can have powerful anti-inflammatory effects. According to Gardner's research, participants consuming low-sugar fermented foods showed improved inflammatory markers and increased gut microbial diversity, with benefits potentially surpassing those of fiber intake.
Gardner discusses the complexities of conducting reliable nutrition studies, including the challenges of controlling variables and securing funding. He emphasizes the importance of maintaining research integrity, particularly when dealing with industry funding, and highlights the difficulties in communicating nuanced scientific findings to the public through media channels.
1-Page Summary
The discussion reveals that there is no single "best" diet that suits everyone, with individual adaptability to diverse foods playing a crucial role.
Andrew Huberman and Christopher Gardner converge on the opinion that there is no universally optimal diet, as people thrive on a range of diets owing to human adaptability. Huberman acknowledges this through his own dietary experiences, while Gardner advocates for a whole food, plant-based diet, emphasizing that this approach is not strictly vegan or vegetarian but can include varying proportions of animal products.
Resilience in human nutrition is evident in the thriving health of indigenous populations such as the Tarahumara Indians and Alaskan Inuits, who traditionally consumed high-carbohydrate and high-fat diets respectively. Michael Pollan highlights the contrast between such diets and the problematic standard American diet, laden with processed and packaged foods. Gardner emphasizes the health issues that emerge when traditional diets are replaced with modern, processed foods.
Gardner discusses how genetic predispositions, such as [restricted term] resistance, may determine suitability to specific diets, citing the A to Z study that revealed significant individual responses to different proportions of carbohydrates and fats.
Individuals who are [restricted term] resistant, Gardner notes, may benefit from a lower-carbohydrate diet. He refers to a study identifying three single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) that could predict whether a person is better suited for a low-fat or low-carb diet. These findings align with his observation that literature suggests [restricted term] resistance might predict a better response to low-carb diets.
Gardner and Huberman discuss the genetic basis of die ...
Evaluating Dietary Choices and the "Optimal" Diet
In the podcast, the host and guests discuss the ongoing controversy of protein requirements, particularly the debate over plant-based versus animal-based proteins, delving into misconceptions and the scientific evidence behind them.
The question of how much protein a person needs has not reached a consensus in nutritional science, with different figures recommended by various sources.
Christopher Gardner clarifies that the recommended daily allowance (RDA) of protein is set at two standard deviations above the value determined by nitrogen balance tests, which is meant to ensure 97.5% of the population exceeds the necessary intake. The current average intake among Americans is around 1.2 grams per kilogram of body weight per day, more than some experts recommend.
Gardner informs that the body has a limited capacity to store excess dietary protein; therefore, consuming protein far beyond immediate needs for muscle maintenance or growth won’t contribute to muscle storage for future use.
Many people believe that plant proteins are inferior to animal proteins, a claim Gardner and others challenge by presenting scientific evidence.
Gardner debunks the myth that plant proteins are incomplete, stating that all plant foods contain all nine essential amino acids in varying proportions. He likens amino acids in plants to Scrabble letters – some are more prevalent than others, but all are present.
Gardner emphasizes that the legume family, which includes beans and soy with high protein content ...
Protein's Role in Diet: Plant-Based Vs. Animal-Based Debate
Christopher Gardner and Andrew Huberman address the pervasive issues surrounding processed and ultra-processed foods in American diets and explore possible avenues for healthier, more sustainable solutions.
Huberman highlights the controversy around food additives, dyes, binders, and other components in processed foods and how they garner a lot of media attention. He mentions that another red dye, possibly number 40, was recently banned following a study, raising concerns about the harmful effects of such ingredients.
Gardner discusses the intricate nature of studying the health concerns associated with additives in processed foods. He brings up the NOVA classification system, which addresses the impact of non-traditional ingredients such as colorants and flavorants present in ultra-processed foods. He references a list from the American Heart Association's scientific advisory, which includes 150 different molecules, including colorants and various chemicals that may have negative health effects.
Huberman notes that starches, often combined with fats to make them palatable, are typically not overeaten in the form of protein but contribute to metabolic issues when consumed in high amounts as part of processed foods. Huberman also criticizes the extensive ingredient lists in artificial meats, such as Beyond Meat and Impossible Meat, which align with consumer perceptions of "fake" and potentially unhealthy foods.
Gardner adds that ultra-processed foods are linked to significant portions of the American carbohydrate intake coming from poor-quality sources like added sugars and refined grains. Europeans have observed that the same food products sold by companies in their home countries have far fewer ingredients than those sold in the US, indicating a discrepancy in manufacturing practices.
The FDA established the "generally recognized as safe" (GRASS) designation for additives, with the number of GRASS items ballooning from 800 to 10,000. Huberman criticizes these "cosmetic" additives for contributing to food being overly available, inexpensive, and long-lasting, often to the detriment of nutrition.
Gardner articulates the need for food industry collaboration to improve processed food quality without merely focusing on individual dietary changes. He praises Beyond Meat for its responsiveness to health concerns, enhancing their product by removing ingredients like coconut oil and adding benign ones after research indicated health benefits.
Gardner proposes that a return to traditional animal husbandry, where animals are pasture-raised, could result in healthier meat devoid of the hormones and antibiotics necessary in standard corn and soy diets for livestock.
Gardner advocates working with culinary professionals to create appealing, healthy, and sustainable meals, citing partnerships with institutions like the Culinary Institute of America. The Menus of Change initiative he mentions embodies this partnership, combining the expertise of a ...
The Issues With Processed/Ultra-Processed Foods and Potential Solutions
Experts discuss how dietary fiber and fermented foods play a vital role in gut health, impacting inflammation and chronic disease risk, yet underscore that individual tolerance and the body's response can vary greatly.
Christopher Gardner emphasizes the need to increase fiber for a healthier diet, which positively affects individual health and the planet. He refers to a study that boosts fiber intake based on positive outcomes seen in mice. Although there were no specific details provided about the impact of fiber intake on inflammation and chronic disease risk, Andrew Huberman notes that fiber is crucial for health, offering anti-cancer properties and supporting digestion.
Fiber plays a key role in reducing inflammation and the risk of chronic diseases. However, the benefits can be nuanced. A study revealed that some individuals, especially those with a low diversity in their gut microbiome, experienced adverse inflammatory responses when consuming a high amount of dietary fiber. This suggests that not everyone may tolerate large fiber intake equally well.
Huberman himself experiences limitations to how much fiber his gut can handle, sharing his discomfort with bloating, gassiness, or frequent bathroom visits. This hints at the complex relationship between fiber intake and gut diversity, where low diversity might lead to intolerance of significant amounts of fiber.
Participants consuming fermented foods experienced improvements in inflammatory markers and an increase in gut microbial diversity, showcasing the potent anti-inflammatory effect of these foods.
The study's fermented foods group managed to increase their intake to six servings per day and showed a clear benefit in reducing inflammatory markers, independent of their baseline microbial diversity. The inclusion of specific probiotic strains that support digestive and immune system health was also emphasized. Low-sugar fermented foods like yogurt, kefir, kombucha, kimchi, and sauerkraut were part of the study, aiming to examine changes in microbiome diversity and inflammation.
In the study referenced by Gardner, 20 different inflammatory markers improved for those consuming fermented foods. Additionally, participants tende ...
Importance of Fiber, Fermented Foods, and Gut Health
Dr. Gardner and Andrew Huberman discuss the complexities of conducting and communicating rigorous nutrition studies to the public amidst media influence and industry funding.
Conducting well-controlled nutrition studies is an immense challenge, according to Dr. Gardner. The conversation reveals the difficulty of isolating a dietary component's impact because of the complex interactions foods have with each other. Dr. Gardner is recognized for well-conducted research, unlike many studies that only compare interventions to the standard American diet.
Gardner served on the Dietary Guidelines Advisory Committee, highlighting the need for more data to answer numerous sub-questions generated from 60 initial questions. He also discusses the Diet Fit study, which required substantial resources, reflecting the logistical and financial challenges sharing that proper studies require controlling one variable at a time.
Because long-term health outcomes cannot be waited for and effects may plateau, nutrition research often lacks sufficient data for strong conclusions. Gardner points out challenges in studying diets like vegan, paleo, or keto due to the difficulty in study design, which can lead to conflicting public messages about diet quality.
The challenge of translating nutrition science to the public and maintaining nuance is exacerbated by the influence of media and anecdotes overshadowing complex, nuanced science. Researchers, such as Dr. Gardner, must navigate the public's reaction to conflicting dietary advice, often resulting from inconsistencies in study designs.
Gardner's study featured in a docu-series on Netflix changed many viewers' diets and elicited criticism, illustrating how media can amplify nutrition research's impact. Despite this attention, communicating the nuances of these studies to the public remains a challenge, particularly when the headlines can be confusing and misleading.
The integrity and transparency of nutrition research become essential, especially when industry ...
Challenges of Nutrition Research and Communicating Findings
Download the Shortform Chrome extension for your browser