Matinee Monday: Blues Brothers 2000 LIVE!
Dive into the comedic breakdown of "Blues Brothers 2000" with the hosts of "How Did This Get Made?" as Paul Scheer, Jason Mantzoukas, and June Diane Raphael dissect this notorious sequel in their latest episode. Their critique navigates the movie's numerous pitfalls, from the sluggish pacing and underdeveloped plot to the unsuccessful efforts in character development. As the hosts scrutinize the film's transitions, geography, and the introduction of replacement characters such as Goodman and Scribbles, they unveil their unanimous sentiment that these elements fall short of capturing the essence of the beloved original.
The episode isn't just a barrage of criticisms; it's a nuanced conversation that includes comparisons to the comedic brilliance of the first "Blues Brothers" movie. Mantzoukas, Raphael, and Scheer remark on the sequel's struggle to preserve the original's charm—blaming issues on Dan Aykroyd's "Akroydian" direction and creative decision-making. Even with discussions about memorable moments, including an elaborate police car pileup and the Battle of the Bands climax that features real musicians, the hosts deliver an engaging and candid conversation that will strike a chord with fans of the franchise as well as movie enthusiasts intrigued by film flops.
This is a preview of the Shortform summary of the Mar 11, 2024 episode of the How Did This Get Made?
Sign up for Shortform to access the whole episode summary along with additional materials like counterarguments and context.
1-Page Summary
The Blues Brothers 2000 Movie
The "Blues Brothers 2000" film attracts sharp criticism for elements like plot, pacing, and character development. Hosts June Diane Raphael, Jason Mantzoukas, and Paul Scheer are predominantly unsatisfied with the sequel, often comparing it unfavorably to the original.
Criticism of the film's plot, pacing, characters, etc.
The film faces significant criticism for its slow pacing and unclear plot. Scheer highlights a lack of musicality in the beginning, pointing to only a half-song within the first 30 minutes as a sign of poor pacing. The hosts also criticize the incoherent geographical transitions from Chicago to New Orleans causing viewer disorientation.
Lack of plot and character development
Raphael and Mantzoukas hit hard on the film for its inability to develop its plot and characters meaningfully. They pinpoint issues like the late attempt to reunite the band and the superficial concern for a young character as symptomatic of the film's broader shortcomings in depth and narrative direction.
Replacing John Belushi's character with kids/new characters like Scribbles
In an attempt to fill the void of John Belushi's character, new characters such as Goodman and Scribbles are introduced. However, the hosts unanimously agree that these characters do not deliver the same energy and appeal as the original cast.
Comparison to the original Blues Brothers movie
Mantzoukas labels the sequel as a detriment to the original's legacy, situating the blame on Dan Aykroyd's "Akroydian" direction which Raphael and Scheer find disappointing. They call out the out-of-place supernatural elements and an overreliance on CGI which detracts from the authenticity of its predecessor.
Inferior plot, characters, and music
The sequel does not measure up to the original concerning its plot, character vibrancy, and musical appeal. The hosts discuss how the movie misses the mark with its inflated dependency on stunts and special effects at the expense of a clear and engaging story.
Dan Aykroyd's performance and dominance of the film
Aykroyd's performance is critiqued by the hosts, with his role, direction, and writing questioned for their effectiveness. Though recognized for inheriting the franchise, Aykroyd's creative decisions, including those regarding casting and continuity, are generally viewed as missteps.
Poor direction, writing, and starring role
The critique extends to Aykroyd's leading role, with his writing and direction met with disapproval from the hosts. Disappointment with the direction of the franchise under Aykroyd's influence is clear from their commentary.
Memorable scenes
Despite their criticisms, the hosts find some scenes memorable for their absurd humor, like the police car pileup, with the film notably destroying one more vehicle than the original movie did.
Car chases and crashes
The car chases and pileup featuring 104 vehicles are discussed as a touchstone for humor and excitement within the film, despite the implausibility of the scenes.
The Battle of the Bands climax
The Battle of the Bands is noted by Mantzoukas as a film-saving performance overshadowed by an anticlimactic tone. The involvement of renowned musicians provided the sequence with a degree of prestige, despite being met with mixed reactions from the hosts.
1-Page Summary
Additional Materials
Clarifications
- June Diane Raphael, Jason Mantzoukas, and Paul Scheer are well-known comedians and actors who often collaborate on podcasts and projects discussing movies and pop culture. They are hosts of the popular podcast "How Did This Get Made?" where they humorously critique and analyze films, often focusing on aspects like plot, characters, and overall quality. Their comedic chemistry and insightful commentary have garnered them a significant following in the entertainment industry.
- Goodman and Scribbles are new characters introduced in the "Blues Brothers 2000" film as replacements for the original character played by John Belushi. These characters were brought in to fill the void left by Belushi's absence in the sequel. However, they were perceived by critics as lacking the same energy and appeal as the original cast members.
- Dan Aykroyd's "Aykroydian" direction in the context of the Blues Brothers 2000 film refers to his distinctive style of filmmaking and storytelling. It encompasses his choices in directing the movie, shaping the narrative, and influencing the overall tone and creative decisions. Aykroyd's "Aykroydian" direction reflects his personal touch and vision as a filmmaker, which may have impacted how the sequel was perceived by critics and audiences.
- The Battle of the Bands climax in "Blues Brothers 2000" is referred to as a "film-saving performance" because it is seen as a pivotal moment in the movie where the characters engage in a musical competition that adds excitement and energy to the storyline. This scene is significant as it showcases the talents of the musicians involved and injects a sense of competition and spectacle into the film, potentially elevating the overall entertainment value for the audience.
- In the Battle of the Bands scene in "Blues Brothers 2000," renowned musicians were involved in the performance. This added a level of prestige and musical authenticity to the sequence. Despite this, the involvement of these musicians received mixed reactions from the hosts critiquing the film.
- In "Blues Brothers 2000," there is a scene involving car chases and crashes, including a police car pileup. The statement about destroying one more vehicle than the original movie did is a reference to the exaggerated and comedic nature of the car-related chaos in the sequel. This detail highlights the film's tendency to escalate and amplify the action sequences for entertainment value.
Counterarguments
- The film's slow pacing may be a deliberate attempt to explore characters and settings more deeply, which some viewers might appreciate.
- The unclear plot and incoherent geographical transitions could be seen as a stylistic choice that pays homage to the chaotic and unpredictable nature of blues music and the original film's spirit.
- The lack of musicality in the beginning might be intended to build anticipation for the musical numbers that follow, creating a contrast that highlights the performances.
- The late attempt to reunite the band and the superficial concern for a young character could be interpreted as a reflection of the disjointed realities that musicians sometimes face.
- New characters like Goodman and Scribbles offer a fresh perspective and the potential to attract a new audience, even if they differ from the original cast.
- The sequel's differences from the original, including Dan Aykroyd's direction, might appeal to those looking for a new take on the Blues Brothers universe rather than a retread of the first film.
- The supernatural elements and CGI could be appreciated for bringing a modern twist to the franchise, appealing to contemporary audiences with updated visual effects.
- The inflated dependency on stunts and special effects might be seen as an evolution of the franchise, aiming to meet the expectations of a 1990s audience accustomed to high-octane action films.
- Dan Aykroyd's performance, direction, and writing could be defended as a passionate attempt to keep the Blues Brothers' legacy alive, even if it deviates from the original.
- The creative decisions regarding casting and continuity might be seen as necessary for the film to stand on its own rather than being a mere copy of its predecessor.
- The memorable scenes, such as the police car pileup and the Battle of the Bands climax, could be considered successful in providing entertainment and spectacle, which is a valid objective for any film.
- The car chases and crashes, while implausible, might be enjoyed for their over-the-top nature and as a nod to the car chase in the original film.
- The Battle of the Bands climax, despite mixed reactions, could be viewed as a highlight that showcases real musicians and live performances, which is a rare treat in modern cinema.
Related Shortform Content
Get access to the context and additional materials
The Blues Brothers 2000 Movie
"The Blues Brothers 2000" film is a sequel fraught with criticisms regarding its plot, pacing, and characters, and is a subject of much debate among its viewers.
Criticism of the film's plot, pacing, characters, etc.
June Diane Raphael, Jason Mantzoukas, and Paul Scheer share a strong distaste for the film, citing its lengthy duration and slow pacing. Scheer points out the lack of musical engagement in the beginning—highlighting only half a song in the first 30 minutes—indicating a poor pace. The hosts find fault with the film's inability to coherently detail the journey from Chicago to New Orleans, which significantly contributes to viewers' disorientation.
The film is criticized for its lack of plot and character development. Mantzoukas notes a child character's prolonged silence in the film and Raphael assails the film for laziness, especially in the introduction and treatment of a character she refers to as Scribbles. The podcasters convey confusion at the film's intent, failing to understand the characters' goals beyond reassembling the band. They argue that this comes too late in the film, with an absence of genuine connection to the original Blues Brother's objective of saving an orphanage.
Lack of plot and character development
The hosts criticize the movie for its late and ineffective attempt at bringing the band back together, accomplishing little in terms of plot and character development. Mantzoukas and Raphael, in particular, find fault with the way the film tries to assure viewers of a young character’s safety—through repetitive shots of him falling asleep—as an inadequate and careless endeavor.
Replacing John Belushi's character with kids/new characters like Scribbles
Scheer notes that in the absence of the late John Belushi, the film introduces characters such as John Goodman and a child—whose name is mentioned only as Scribbles—suggesting that their inclusion is meant to fill the void left by Belushi's character. Yet, the hosts agree that these new characters fail to deliver the magnetism and energy of the original ensemble.
Comparison to the original Blues Brothers movie
Mantzoukas describes the sequel as a radical rewriting of the cool and well-regarded history of the original. He deems the follow-up more "Akroydian", a term implicating Dan Aykroyd's overwhelming influence on the film's direction, which the hosts perceive as largely detrimental. Raphael and Scheer find the supernatural elements—like Morton flying and CGI horses—to be jarring departures from the original style. The sequel is criticized for overreliance on CGI and special effects, which diminishes the authentic charm and humor that defined the first film.
Inferior plot, characters, and music
The movie is broadly panned for failing to live up to the original's plot, characters, and music, relying instead on superficial stunts and excess without substance. Raphael and Scheer lament the missing clear goal and heart that were present in the original film, with Scheer specifically pointing to the diminished role and star power that Belushi brought to the original.
Dan Aykroyd's performance and dominance of the film
Dan Aykroyd's performance is controversial among the hosts, with Scheer critiquing his role for lacking the appeal of Belushi's character. Aykroyd's direction and writing are also questioned, as are his starring contributions. Raphael finds the movie disrespectful, suggesting a dissatisfaction with Aykroyd's decisions. Despit ...
Here’s what you’ll find in our full summary
The Blues Brothers 2000 Movie
Additional Materials
Clarifications
- June Diane Raphael, Jason Mantzoukas, and Paul Scheer are critics who have shared their negative opinions on "The Blues Brothers 2000" film. They criticize aspects like the plot, pacing, character development, and the introduction of new characters like Scribbles. They find fault with the lack of musical engagement, slow pacing, and the film's departure from the original's charm and humor. The hosts also discuss Dan Aykroyd's performance and his influence on the film, questioning his decisions and the direction of the sequel.
- The original "Blues Brothers" movie, released in 1980, starred John Belushi and Dan Aykroyd as Jake and Elwood Blues, respectively. It was known for its energetic musical performances, car chases, and humor. The film was a cult classic and beloved for its iconic soundtrack featuring rhythm and blues, soul, and blues music. John Belushi's portrayal of Jake Blues was particularly memorable for his charisma and comedic timing.
- The term "Akroydian" implies a style or influence reminiscent of Dan Aykroyd, suggesting a significant impact on the direction or tone of a film. In this context, it indicates a shift towards elements associated with Aykroyd's creative preferences or tendencies. The term is used to highlight a departure from the original style or spirit of a work, often attributed to Aykroyd's involvement.
- In "The Blues Brothers 2000" sequel, there are supernatural elements like Morton flying and CGI horses. These departures from reality are seen as jarring compared to the original film's style. The excessive use of CGI and special effects in the sequel is criticized for diminishing the authentic charm and humor of the first movie.
- Dan Aykroyd's performance in "The Blues Brothers 2000" is criticized for lacking the appeal and energy ...
Counterarguments
- The film's slow pacing may be a deliberate attempt to explore characters and settings more deeply, offering a different storytelling approach than the original.
- The journey from Chicago to New Orleans could be seen as a metaphorical one, focusing on the characters' internal growth rather than geographical accuracy.
- The lack of plot and character development might be perceived as a stylistic choice, emphasizing the film's musical elements and comedic moments over traditional narrative structure.
- Introducing new characters like John Goodman and Scribbles could be viewed as a way to expand the universe and offer fresh dynamics, rather than simply replacing John Belushi's character.
- The use of CGI and special effects may be an attempt to modernize the franchise and appeal to contemporary audiences accustomed to such technology in films.
- Dan Aykroyd's performance and influence on the film could be appreciated by fans who enjoy his unique comedic style and dedicati ...
Related Shortform Content
Get access to the context and additional materials
Create Summaries for anything on the web
Download the Shortform Chrome extension for your browser
