Dive into an irreverent critique of "Fifty Shades Darker" with hosts Paul Scheer, Jason Mantzoukas, and guest Joel Kim Booster on "How Did This Get Made?” The trio dissects the film’s challenges, from uninspiring plot points to the absence of compelling character arcs, providing a comedic yet incisive look at the sequel’s shortcomings. While the movie attempts to shock and captivate with high-stakes drama and an introduction of new antagonists, the hosts argue it falls flat, pointing to the lack of significant impact on the storyline and an overarching shallowness in its development.
The podcast doesn't shy away from the sexual content and fantasies that are core to the "Fifty Shades" franchise. Mantzoukas and company analyze the failure of the erotic scenes to deliver their intended effect, often finding humor in what's meant to be sensuous. Their banter touches on everything from the film's tepid approach to BDSM to the unexpected conservatism in its portrayal of sexuality, despite its source material's notorious reputation. "How Did This Get Made?" offers listeners a rollicking session that breaks down the elusive chemistry of successful erotic thrillers and the pitfalls encountered in this steamy, yet underwhelming cinematic endeavor.
Sign up for Shortform to access the whole episode summary along with additional materials like counterarguments and context.
The recent film under discussion suffers from both a lackluster plot and poor character development. Hosts Jason Mantzoukas, Paul Scheer, and others, express considerable disappointment with the film's narrative, which seems to cram in dramatic elements—such as a helicopter crash and the introduction of three new villains—without substantial impact or character response. These events come across as shallow, failing to deepen the story or provide meaningful consequences.
Characters, acting, and their development are also points of critique. The lead actors, including Dakota Johnson and Kim Basinger, fail to bring depth or fascination to their roles. Listeners are left with little understanding of the characters’ motivations or backstories, and the performances do not overcome the mediocre dialogue or add any intrigue to their characters.
The hosts mock the film's portrayal of certain elements, such as unrealistic and nonsensical business discussions and the peculiarly enduring "red room" experience without psychological repercussions. They highlight the absence of coherent character motivation, particularly with Basinger's underexplored role, and call out the general failure of the film to provide meaningful character arcs or engaging performances.
The hosts critique the movie's sex scenes and fantasy elements, often using humor to highlight the film's shortcomings. Mantzoukas notes the ineffectiveness of the intended erotic scenes, finding the use of props like kegel balls to fall flat, becoming more comedic than sensual. The hosts express disappointment with the film's failure to deliver the provocative experience promised by the books. Instead of a dominant Christian Grey and explicit BDSM scenarios, the film delivers much tamer content.
Discussing the influence of author EL James on the film, the hosts humorously suggest Mormon undertones in the film's portrayal of sexuality, pointing to a certain naïveté and conservatism in the depiction of sexual acts. The film's approach to eroticism is criticized for being tepid, with the "dirtiest Mormon lady narrative" characterizing the sexual content as surprisingly restrained given the series' reputation.
The podcast addresses issues with the filmmaking and direction of the film's sequel, noting both improvements and persistent issues compared to the first installment. Critics, including Paul Scheer, discuss the sequel's superior lighting but highlight the inconsistencies in visual storytelling. The sequel's production saw conflicts and disagreements, with the absence of the original director and screenwriter leading to issues with the film's vision and execution.
Pacing comes under fire, with even less happening plot-wise in the sequel. The structure and editing of the film cause confusion, distorting the flow of the narrative, particularly in essential scenes that lack logic and context. Sarcasm is used to underline the misdirection and production focus, with misplaced priorities being evident in the film's development, such as unnecessary subplots and a reliance on outdated workplace setups.
In summary, the film disappoints with its undelivered character development, mild sexual fantasy portrayal, and problematic filmmaking tactics, leaving much to be desired in terms of depth, sensuality, and technical execution.
1-Page Summary
The hosts, including Jason Mantzoukas, Paul Scheer, and others, delve deeply into the recent film's lack of excitement, both in its plot and character development, expressing substantial disappointment.
The film's narrative draws criticism for including sudden yet unimpactful elements like gunplay and a helicopter accident. The hosts ridicule a scene involving a helicopter crash, pointing out the absurd lack of reaction from the characters and the ensuing triviality of the event—joking about the character's unrealistic behavior, including calling an Uber from the crash site. They mock the inclusion of three new villains, comparing the overcrowding to a Batman film directed by Joel Schumacher.
The film presents supposedly dramatic events, like the aforementioned helicopter crash, in a manner devoid of depth or genuine repercussion, often following them up with mundane activities that seem incongruous to the events that precede them.
Further, the hosts discuss the unrealism and nonsensical business ventures of the male protagonist, including a humorous takedown of a business discussion within the film. They contest the unrealistic scenario wherein the protagonist rapidly ascends to a high-powered job position. Puzzlement arises over the "red room" and bizarrely enduring physical marks, generating questions about why the characters avoid seeking therapy for obvious issues.
The character dynamics between Kim Basinger’s and the protagonist provoke confusion due to a lack of background clarity, and a stalking subplot adds to the narrative disarray without satisfying payoff. Additional unrealistic elements, such as the handling of an art exhibit and a request for a gift box at a newsstand, are ridiculed for their improbability.
In terms of character portrayal and development, the lead characters are found to lack any compelling traits that might render them funny, intelligent, or interesting. Scheer criticizes Dakota Johnson's character, not finding any particularly engaging attribu ...
Boring plot and lack of character development
The podcast features hosts Jason Mantzoukas, Paul Scheer, and Joel Kim Booster engaging in a humorous and critical discussion about the sex scenes and fantasy elements in the Fifty Shades movies.
Jason Mantzoukas comments on the film's lack of adequately provocative content, suggesting that it should have been more explicit and erotic. The hosts find humor in the movie's attempt at eroticism with the use of props like kegel balls and nipple clamps. They joke about the awkward use of these props, noting the failure of these elements to contribute satisfactorily to the movie's erotic aspects. A comedic reference is made to kegel balls hanging from a stocking, highlighting the clumsy depiction of what was meant to be a sensual scene.
Paul Scheer comments that the film diverges from the original provocative premise of the books. Instead of the anticipated dominant Christian Grey character, the audience gets what Scheer describes as 'a boyfriend with handcuffs'. Jason Mantzoukas points out that expectations of explicit BDSM content in the 'red room' are undercut by the anticlimactic reality of just brief cupping followed by what seems like passionate lovemaking, thereby contradicting the room's intended purpose for dominance and submission scenarios.
Sex scenes and Fifty Shades fantasy elements
In a recent commentary, critics address the various problems that have emerged in a film sequel, focusing on the directing and various technical issues that differ from the first installment of the franchise.
While the sequel has been described as visually better, with well-lit scenes compared to the first film's student-film appearance, this improvement is debated among critics. Paul Scheer notes that despite the enhanced lighting, the visual elements of the movie remain inconsistent, exemplified by the quality and context of photos which resemble headshot outtakes rather than artful, professional photographs.
Scheer brings to light the conflicts behind the scenes, explaining that the original director and screenwriter did not return for the sequel due to disagreements with E.L. James. James was seen as controlling of the script, desiring that the film adhere closely to her books. After the box office success of the first film, the sequel was rushed into production, with James' husband taking over the writing duties. This created a disconnect in the vision and execution of the film, potentially leading to the issues critics have noticed.
The hosts also bring forth implicit criticisms regarding the film’s pacing and narrative structure. Scheer alludes to issues with pacing, suggesting that even less happens in the sequel, and refers to an unrated cut bloated with superfluous scenes. There remains a pervasive sense of confusion over the film's events and a feeling of being dumbfounded after watching it. Notably, important scenes, such as a helicopter crash, ...
Problems with filmmaking and direction
Download the Shortform Chrome extension for your browser