Podcasts > Hidden Brain > Reframing the Battle of Wills

Reframing the Battle of Wills

By Hidden Brain Media

In this episode of Hidden Brain, host Shankar Vedantam and guest Stuart Ablon examine why traditional behavior modification methods that rely on rewards and punishments often fail to create lasting change. They explore the concept that behavioral issues stem not from a lack of motivation or willpower, but from missing foundational skills such as impulse control and working memory.

The discussion introduces Collaborative Problem Solving (CPS) as an alternative approach to behavior modification. This method focuses on building skills through understanding and cooperation rather than imposing consequences. The summary covers research on CPS implementation in various settings, including psychiatric hospitals and juvenile detention centers, and presents findings on its effectiveness compared to conventional behavioral interventions.

Listen to the original

Reframing the Battle of Wills

This is a preview of the Shortform summary of the Oct 27, 2025 episode of the Hidden Brain

Sign up for Shortform to access the whole episode summary along with additional materials like counterarguments and context.

Reframing the Battle of Wills

1-Page Summary

Limitations of Rewards and Punishments to Change Behavior

In their discussion, Shankar Vedantam and Stuart Ablon explore why traditional behavior modification methods often fall short. Ablon explains that while rewards and punishments might serve as reminders of expectations, they fail to develop the necessary skills for lasting behavioral change. These methods not only lack long-term effectiveness but can also generate resentment and conflict. When behavior doesn't improve, people often mistakenly attribute it to a lack of effort rather than recognizing potential skill deficits.

Role of Skills In Shaping Behavior

Ablon challenges the common belief that behavioral issues stem from a lack of motivation. Instead, he emphasizes that skill deficits, such as impulse control and working memory, are often the root cause. He introduces the concept of foundational problem-solving skills, including asking questions, reflective listening, and social thinking. According to Ablon, the principle "people do well if they can" suggests that when individuals struggle, it's typically due to missing skills rather than insufficient willpower.

Collaborative Problem Solving As an Alternative

Ablon presents Collaborative Problem Solving (CPS) as a more effective approach to behavior modification. This method involves three key steps: empathizing with others' perspectives, sharing one's own concerns, and co-creating solutions together. Unlike traditional methods, CPS focuses on building skills and understanding rather than imposing consequences. Ablon's approach has shown impressive results in challenging environments, including psychiatric hospitals and juvenile detention centers. Research from Ottawa demonstrates that children using CPS showed greater improvements in self-regulation and cognitive flexibility compared to those using traditional methods.

1-Page Summary

Additional Materials

Clarifications

  • Collaborative Problem Solving (CPS) is an approach that focuses on resolving conflicts and addressing behavioral challenges through cooperation and mutual understanding. It involves empathizing with others' perspectives, sharing concerns openly, and working together to find solutions. CPS prioritizes building essential skills and fostering communication rather than relying solely on rewards or punishments. This method has shown success in various settings by promoting positive outcomes and enhancing individuals' abilities to navigate complex situations effectively.

Counterarguments

  • Rewards and punishments can be effective in certain contexts, especially when they are immediate and clearly linked to the behavior.
  • Some behaviors may indeed stem from a lack of motivation, and not solely from skill deficits.
  • Traditional behavior modification methods have been successful in various settings and for different individuals, suggesting that they can be part of a comprehensive behavior management strategy.
  • The effectiveness of CPS may vary depending on the individual and context, and it may not be the best approach for everyone.
  • CPS requires a significant investment of time and effort from the involved parties, which may not always be feasible or practical in certain environments.
  • There may be a risk of overemphasizing skill deficits and underestimating the role of personal responsibility in behavior change.
  • The success of CPS in research settings does not guarantee its effectiveness in all real-world applications.
  • Some critics argue that behaviorism, the theory underlying traditional rewards and punishments, still offers valuable insights into human behavior that can inform modern practices.
  • CPS may not address underlying biological or neurological conditions that can affect behavior, which might also require medical or therapeutic intervention.
  • There could be cultural considerations that affect the applicability and effectiveness of CPS in different societies or communities.

Get access to the context and additional materials

So you can understand the full picture and form your own opinion.
Get access for free
Reframing the Battle of Wills

Limitations of Rewards and Punishments to Change Behavior

Shankar Vedantam and Stuart Ablon explore how traditional methods intended to change behavior may lack long-term effectiveness and inadvertently cause negative outcomes.

Motivating Behavior Through Rewards and Punishment Can Backfire

Stuart Ablon points out that while rewards and punishments can serve as reminders of what is expected, they fall short in supporting skill development needed for lasting behavioral change. These methods fail to help people remain calm during periods of frustration, and there is a significant negative impact associated with the development of intrinsic motivation.

Temporary Behavior Change Lacks Skill Development for Lasting Impact

Ablon further explains that because rewards and punishments do not aid in building neurocognitive skills or fostering healthy relationships, their effect on behavior is typically temporary and superficial. Without learning the necessary skills, an individual may comply in the short term but will not exhibit enduring behavioral change.

Rewards and Punishments Cause Resentment and Conflict

Punishment-based strategies do not address the underlying issues, which can lead to resentment. According to Vedantam, rather th ...

Here’s what you’ll find in our full summary

Registered users get access to the Full Podcast Summary and Additional Materials. It’s easy and free!
Start your free trial today

Limitations of Rewards and Punishments to Change Behavior

Additional Materials

Clarifications

  • Neurocognitive skills encompass a range of abilities related to cognitive functions and brain processes. These skills involve aspects like attention, memory, problem-solving, and decision-making. In the context of behavior change, developing neurocognitive skills can help individuals regulate emotions, manage impulses, and make better choices. By enhancing these skills, individuals can improve their capacity to adapt to challenges, cope with stress, and sustain positive behavioral changes over time.
  • Intrinsic motivation is the drive to engage in an activity for its own sake, deriving satisfaction and enjoyment from the process itself. Rewards and punishments can undermine intrinsic motivation by shifting the focus from internal satisfaction to external incentives or consequences. When intrinsic motivation is weakened, individuals may become less interested in the activity for its inherent value, leading to potential negative impacts on long-term behavior change.
  • Misattribution of behavior problems to lack of effort occurs when individuals attribute someone's behavioral issues to a perceived lack of trying or motivation, rather than consid ...

Counterarguments

  • Rewards and punishments have been used effectively in various settings, such as in education and parenting, suggesting that when applied correctly, they can contribute to positive behavior change.
  • Behavioral economics research shows that incentives can be powerful motivators for certain behaviors, indicating that rewards can have a lasting impact if they are designed to align with individuals' values and goals.
  • Some argue that intrinsic motivation is not always necessary for all types of behavior change, especially for routine or mundane tasks where extrinsic motivators may be more effective.
  • Cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) often uses principles of reinforcement and punishment to help individuals modify their behavior, which has been empirically supported in treating a range of psychological issues.
  • In some cases, the immediate safety or compliance is necessary, and rewards or punishments can provide a clear and immediate incentive for the desired behavior, which can be particularly important in high-stakes environments.
  • The use of rewards and punishments can be part of a broader strategy that includes skill development, suggesting that these methods can be complementary rather than mutually exclusive with other approaches.
  • Some argue that the p ...

Get access to the context and additional materials

So you can understand the full picture and form your own opinion.
Get access for free
Reframing the Battle of Wills

Role of Skills In Shaping Behavior

Stuart Ablon examines the critical importance of skill development in influencing behavior, challenging the common belief that a lack of motivation is often the root of adaptive behavioral issues.

Lack of Skills, Not Motivation, Hinders Adaptive Behavior

Ablon stresses that rather than a lack of motivation, it is often skill deficits that lead to challenges in behavior change. He cites impulse control as a critical skill for contemplating actions' consequences before acting and emphasizes the importance of skills in shaping behavior. Ablon explains that the quick attribution to a lack of will is often a response to our own frustration, and doing so can damage a person’s self-esteem by implying they’re not trying hard enough.

Foundational Skills For Problem-Solving

Ablon discusses foundational skills for problem-solving as a key aspect of collaborative problem solving. He lists asking questions, making educated guesses, reflective listening, and providing reassurance as essential skills that sometimes people struggle to develop. Working memory is described by Ablon as a "cognitive shelf" for organizing thoughts, while social thinking skills range from initiating conversations to understanding how actions affect others. Ablon also notes the importance of feedback loops; a broken loop can prevent one from learning from interactions.

Skill Deficits, Not "Lack of Will," Explain Struggles to Change Behaviors

Ablon asserts that "people do well if they can," and when they don’t, it often indicates a skill deficit rather than a lack of motivation. He advises managers to understand their team members’ varied skill domains and recognize their own abilities, embracing weaknesses as well as strengths. Ablon remarks on the frustration that arises when individuals don't perform as desired, leading to a misguided focus on willpower rather than ...

Here’s what you’ll find in our full summary

Registered users get access to the Full Podcast Summary and Additional Materials. It’s easy and free!
Start your free trial today

Role of Skills In Shaping Behavior

Additional Materials

Clarifications

  • Collaborative problem solving involves a group working together to find solutions by combining their skills, knowledge, and perspectives. It focuses on collective efforts to address complex issues through shared decision-making and problem-solving techniques. This approach values teamwork, communication, and cooperation to achieve common goals effectively. Collaborative problem solving enhances creativity, innovation, and efficiency by leveraging the diverse strengths of team members.
  • Feedback loops in the context of behavior and skill development refer to the process where information about one's actions or behaviors is received and used to adjust future actions. This feedback can help individuals learn from their experiences and improve their skills over time. It is a crucial mechanism for self-regulation and continuous improvement in various aspects of life, including problem-solving and social interactions. Understanding and utilizing feedback loops effectively can lead to more effective behavior change and personal growth.
  • Perspective taking involves understanding a situation from someone else's viewpoint. It is crucial for human development and can lead to positive outcomes. It may be challenging for some individuals ...

Counterarguments

  • While skill deficits are indeed significant, motivation can also play a critical role in behavior change, and the two factors often interact.
  • Impulse control is important, but it is not the only skill necessary for considering consequences; other cognitive and emotional factors can also influence decision-making.
  • Attributing behavioral issues to skill deficits might overlook other contributing factors such as environmental influences, emotional disturbances, or physiological conditions.
  • While foundational skills for problem-solving are crucial, the ability to apply these skills effectively can vary based on context and individual differences.
  • Working memory is important, but it is not the sole cognitive function involved in organizing thoughts; attention, executive function, and other cognitive processes also play a role.
  • Social thinking skills are complex and can be influenced by cultural norms and individual experiences, which might not be adequately addressed by a universal set of skills.
  • Feedback loops are important, but their effectiveness can be influenced by the quality of the feedback and the individual's openness to receiving it.
  • The assertion that people do well if they can might oversimplify complex behavioral issues and not account for the multifaceted nature of human behavior.
  • While managers should understand their team members' skills, they also need to consider how organizational culture, policies, and res ...

Get access to the context and additional materials

So you can understand the full picture and form your own opinion.
Get access for free
Reframing the Battle of Wills

Collaborative Problem Solving As an Alternative to Changing Behavior

Stuart Ablon, joined by Shankar Vedantam, delves into the merits of collaborative problem-solving (CPS) over traditional behavior modification. It is an approach built on empathy, problem-solving, and skill-building rather than rewards and punishments.

Collaborative Problem Solving Involves Working Together to Understand, Share Perspectives, and Co-create Solutions

True Collaborative Problem Solving (CPS) is a process that should be transparent and done with someone, not to them, as explained by psychologist Stuart Ablon. This method does not aim to leverage a solution but seeks mutual resolution. Ablon states that key to CPS is effective listening which leads to better collaboration. He contrasts traditional methods, or "Plan A," which rely on rewards and punishments to impose will, with "Plan B" or CPS, as the sought alternative. CPS aims to understand concerns without enforcing decisions, as demonstrated by a nurse who successfully utilized this approach with a patient. Shankar Vedantam suggests that there are better ways to help people make lasting change, implying the efficiency of CPS.

Ablon points to a quick judgment of someone's lack of will as a coping mechanism for frustration, which places the burden on the individual and undermines the collaborative potential to assist. He indicates that a lack of representation among those struggling with behavior and those who are not may reveal neuropsychological skill deficits that must be addressed for CPS to be effective.

Empathy, Problem-Solving, and Skill-Building Over Rewards and Punishments

Three key steps or ingredients define CPS:

  1. The empathy ingredient is where one party genuinely attempts to understand the other's concerns, perspectives, or difficulties with a situation.
  2. The second ingredient involves the other party sharing their own concerns or perspectives.
  3. The third ingredient invites both parties to co-create a solution that respects each other's concerns.

Ablon emphasizes the importance of the other person proposing solutions first, as this helps develop their problem-solving skills, akin to learning by doing. His ideas were put into practice at a state psychiatric hospital with a high rate of staff assaults. While the nurse used reflective listening and reassurance to empathize with a patient, the collaborative effort began with understanding and problem-solving without imposing decisions or resorting to punishments.

The collaborative approach also includes setting clear expectations and boundaries; it doesn't represent giving up but provides an alternative option when someone does not meet these expectations. Instead of defaulting to rewards and punishments, CPS works on empathy, problem-solving, and skill-building to address behavioral challenges effectively.

Empathy is central to Ablon's collaborative problem-solving method, which requires understanding the other party's perspective before sharing one's concerns. It is a step different from agreeing with them and is critical for solving problems cooperatively. This process demonstrated success in psychiatric hospitals, where staff who initially were skeptical of CPS recognized its benefits for creating a less hostile environment.

Collaborative Problem Solving Outperforms Traditional Behavior Modification In Reducing Problematic Behaviors and Enhancing Cognitive and Social Skills

Collaborative Problem Solving Boosts Behavior and Relationships

Ablon tested his CPS approa ...

Here’s what you’ll find in our full summary

Registered users get access to the Full Podcast Summary and Additional Materials. It’s easy and free!
Start your free trial today

Collaborative Problem Solving As an Alternative to Changing Behavior

Additional Materials

Clarifications

  • In the context of collaborative problem-solving (CPS) versus traditional behavior modification, "Plan A" represents the traditional approach of using rewards and punishments to enforce compliance and control behavior. On the other hand, "Plan B" signifies the CPS method, which focuses on empathy, understanding, and collaborative solutions rather than imposing decisions through rewards or punishments. Plan A relies on authority and consequences to shape behavior, while Plan B emphasizes mutual understanding and problem-solving to address underlying concerns and foster cooperation.
  • Neuropsychological skill deficits can impact an individual's ability to engage in collaborative problem-solving effectively. These deficits may hinder skills like impulse control, emotional regulation, and perspective-taking, which are crucial for successful CPS interactions. Addressing these deficits through targeted interventions can help individuals better participate in the empathetic, problem-solving approach of CPS. Understanding and accommodating these neuropsychological challenges is essential for optimizing the outcomes of collaborative problem-solving efforts.
  • Reflective listening in collaborative problem-solving involves paraphrasing and summarizing what the other person has said to show understanding. Reassurance in this context means providing comfort or support to the individual without judgment or criticism. These techniques help build rapport, trust, and empathy in the problem-solving process. They aim to create a safe and supportive environment for open communication and mutual understanding.
  • In psychiatric hospitals and juvenile detention centers, Collaborative Problem Solving (CPS) has shown success in reducing challenging behaviors and improving cognitive and social skills among individuals. This approach involves empathy, problem-solving, and skill-building to address behavioral challenges effectively. By focusing on collaboration rather than rewards and punishments, CPS has demonstrated transformative impacts on behavior and relationships in these settings. Studies have highlighted significant reductions in problematic behaviors and improvements in self-regulation and cognitive flexibility skills when CPS is implemented.
  • In the context of collaborative problem-solving (CPS), the comparison to criminal justice systems' focus on accountability highlights a shift in approach from punitive measures to fostering growth and learnin ...

Counterarguments

  • CPS may not be suitable for all individuals or situations, as some may require more structured or directive approaches.
  • The effectiveness of CPS may be limited by the skill level of the facilitator, and not all practitioners may be adequately trained to implement it effectively.
  • CPS can be time-consuming, which may not be practical in settings where time is a constraint, such as in busy classrooms or acute care situations.
  • There may be cultural or systemic barriers that make the implementation of CPS challenging in certain environments.
  • Some critics argue that there are situations where immediate behavior change is necessary for safety or legal reasons, and CPS may not provide rapid enough results.
  • CPS relies heavily on the willingness and ability of both parties to engage in the process, which may not always be present.
  • Traditional behavior modification techniques have a long history and substantial empirical support, suggesting that they should not be entirely discounted.
  • There may be a lack of empirical evidence supporting the efficacy of CPS in comparison to more established behavior modification techniques in certain populations or settings.
  • CPS may not address underlying biological or neurological conditions that could be contributin ...

Get access to the context and additional materials

So you can understand the full picture and form your own opinion.
Get access for free

Create Summaries for anything on the web

Download the Shortform Chrome extension for your browser

Shortform Extension CTA