Podcasts > Hidden Brain > How Much Do We Really Know?

How Much Do We Really Know?

By Hidden Brain Media

In this episode of Hidden Brain, the human tendency to overestimate our understanding of everyday things is explored through research and real-world examples. From people who can't explain how a toilet works to experts making fatal mistakes due to overconfidence, the discussion reveals how this "illusion of knowledge" affects both laypeople and professionals across various fields.

The episode delves into why our brains create these false impressions of understanding, explaining how evolution has shaped our minds to prioritize broad concepts over detailed knowledge. It also presents practical strategies for recognizing and addressing these knowledge gaps, including how the process of explaining complex systems can lead to more moderate viewpoints and better understanding of our own limitations.

Listen to the original

How Much Do We Really Know?

This is a preview of the Shortform summary of the May 19, 2025 episode of the Hidden Brain

Sign up for Shortform to access the whole episode summary along with additional materials like counterarguments and context.

How Much Do We Really Know?

1-Page Summary

The Illusion of Knowledge: Overestimating Understanding

People often believe they understand how things work better than they actually do. Frank Kyle's research demonstrates this through the "toilet test," where individuals struggle to explain the mechanisms of everyday objects like toilets. Phil Fernbach highlights Rebecca Lawson's study showing how people who claimed to understand bicycles couldn't accurately draw them, revealing their overestimated knowledge.

Experts Are Not Immune

This overconfidence extends to experts too. In Los Alamos, a nuclear physicist's overconfidence led to a fatal accident during a plutonium experiment. Similarly, the Air France 447 crash occurred when pilots, overly dependent on automation, made critical errors during a crisis. Shankar Vedantam draws parallels to financial professionals who sometimes rely too heavily on automated systems and complex market structures.

Reasons why the Illusion of Knowledge Occurs

Researchers have found that the human brain prioritizes general action over detailed knowledge storage. Phil Fernbach explains that our minds evolved to focus on broad principles rather than retain specific details, which can create a false sense of understanding complex systems. This is evident in conditions like hyperthymesia, which shows that storing every detail isn't the brain's natural state.

The illusion is further reinforced by selective memory. People tend to remember their successes more vividly than failures, particularly in areas like stock trading, where frequent traders often perform worse despite their confidence in their abilities.

Strategies For Combating the Illusion of Knowledge

Phil Fernbach's research reveals that when people are asked to explain complex systems or political issues in detail, they often discover gaps in their understanding. This realization can lead to less polarized viewpoints and more moderate positions. He suggests that explanatory discussions, approached with curiosity rather than defensiveness, can foster more productive interactions and help people recognize the limits of their knowledge, particularly when dealing with complex systems.

1-Page Summary

Additional Materials

Clarifications

  • Hyperthymesia is a rare condition where individuals can vividly recall an extensive amount of their life experiences in great detail. People with hyperthymesia often have uncontrollable associations with dates, instantly visualizing past events related to those dates. This condition is characterized by spending a significant amount of time reflecting on personal memories and having exceptional recall abilities for specific events. Hyperthymesia is distinct from photographic memory as it involves subjective and detailed recollection rather than exact replication of past experiences.
  • Los Alamos is a location in New Mexico known for hosting the Los Alamos National Laboratory, a significant research facility. During World War II, it was the site of the top-secret Manhattan Project, where scientists developed the first atomic bombs. The reference in the text highlights an incident involving a nuclear physicist's overconfidence leading to a fatal accident during an experiment at Los Alamos.
  • Air France Flight 447 crashed in 2009 due to a series of events triggered by inconsistent airspeed readings, leading to a stall that the pilots were unable to recover from. The accident resulted in the loss of all 228 passengers and crew on board. The investigation revealed issues with airspeed measurements and pilot response to the stall situation. The tragedy highlighted the importance of pilot training, aircraft systems, and crew coordination in aviation safety.
  • Shankar Vedantam is an American journalist and science correspondent known for his work on human behavior. He is recognized for his Hidden Brain series, including a book, podcast, and radio program. Vedantam has a background in electronics engineering and journalism, with experience at The Washington Post and Slate. He published a book titled "The Hidden Brain" in 2010.

Counterarguments

  • While the "toilet test" and bicycle drawing study illustrate that people may overestimate their understanding of certain mechanisms, it could be argued that practical knowledge or the ability to use these objects effectively does not necessarily require understanding their inner workings.
  • The mention of experts' overconfidence leading to accidents might overlook the complexity of such incidents, which often result from a combination of factors, including systemic issues, rather than solely overconfidence.
  • The brain's prioritization of general action over detailed knowledge storage is an evolutionary adaptation that could be seen as efficient and beneficial for survival, rather than just a source of false understanding.
  • Selective memory might serve adaptive functions, such as maintaining a positive self-image and motivation, which could be beneficial in certain contexts.
  • The strategy of asking people to explain complex systems in detail to reveal gaps in understanding might not always lead to less polarized viewpoints; some individuals may double down on their beliefs when challenged.
  • The effectiveness of explanatory discussions in fostering productive interactions may vary depending on the individual's openness to changing their views and the context of the discussion.

Get access to the context and additional materials

So you can understand the full picture and form your own opinion.
Get access for free
How Much Do We Really Know?

The Illusion of Knowledge: Overestimating Understanding

The hosts shine a light on how individuals often overestimate their understanding of how things work, a misconception that can have serious implications.

People Overestimate Their Understanding Of how Things Work

"Toilet Test" Reveals Difficulty In Explaining Simple Object Mechanisms

Frank Kyle's research shows that people generally think they understand how everyday objects operate, but their knowledge is superficial. The "toilet test" reveals this gap in knowledge. When people are asked to elaborate on the workings of a toilet, they struggle to explain the mechanisms beyond the basic idea of flushing. Phil Fernbach admits that despite learning how toilets work many times, he can't retain the explanation, demonstrating that understanding simple mechanisms is often harder than expected.

Fernbach reads a detailed account of how a toilet's tank, bowl, and trapway coordinate to create the siphoning effect during a flush. Shankar Vedantam tests his comprehension by recounting a simplified version, and Phil indicates that only a professional plumber could accurately assess its correctness.

Furthermore, Phil Fernbach cites Rebecca Lawson's study where individuals who thought they understood bicycles were asked to draw them but found it much harder than expected. This exercise revealed their overestimated knowledge.

Experts May Mistake Illusions For Knowledge

Nuclear Lab Accident Shows how Overconfidence Leads To Danger

In Los Alamos, New Mexico, the dangerous "tickling the dragon's tail" experiment involved eminent physicists testing the reactivity of the plutonium core with two beryllium hemispheres. An accident occurred when Lewis Slotin used a flathead screwdriver to separate the hemispheres, and it slipped, causing intense radiation release and leading to his death. There was a safer procedure available, but Slotin’s overconfidence in his expertise likely contributed to his failure to foresee the problem and opt for the safer method.

...

Here’s what you’ll find in our full summary

Registered users get access to the Full Podcast Summary and Additional Materials. It’s easy and free!
Start your free trial today

The Illusion of Knowledge: Overestimating Understanding

Additional Materials

Clarifications

  • Air France Flight 447 crashed in 2009 due to a series of events triggered by inconsistent airspeed readings, leading to a stall that the pilots were unable to recover from, resulting in the tragic loss of all passengers and crew on board. The investigation revealed that ice crystals obstructed the aircraft's pitot tubes, causing the autopilot to disconnect and the crew to respond incorrectly, ultimately leading to the fatal stall. The accident highlighted the dangers of overreliance on automation and the importance of pilot training in handling unexpected situations.
  • During the Air France Flight 447 incident, the pilot's actions were influe ...

Counterarguments

  • Overestimation of understanding may not always be due to ignorance but could be a result of cognitive biases that affect all humans, such as the Dunning-Kruger effect.
  • The "toilet test" might not accurately measure understanding as the ability to explain something verbally is different from understanding how it works or being able to repair it.
  • Some individuals may retain detailed explanations of mechanisms better through hands-on experience rather than verbal or written descriptions.
  • The study on drawing bicycles may not fully account for the difference between theoretical knowledge and practical, visual-spatial intelligence.
  • Mistaking illusions for knowledge could sometimes be a necessary heuristic; experts can't know everything in detail and must rely on simplified models to make practical decisions.
  • The Los Alamos accident could also be attributed to a lack of adequate safety protocols or a culture that prioritized experimentation over safety, not just individual overconfidence.
  • The Air France 447 crash could be seen as a failure of training programs to keep manual flying skills sharp rather than an inherent problem with ...

Get access to the context and additional materials

So you can understand the full picture and form your own opinion.
Get access for free
How Much Do We Really Know?

Reasons why the Illusion of Knowledge Occurs

The phenomenon where individuals overestimate their comprehension or expertise in a certain area is known as the illusion of knowledge. Several factors contribute to this cognitive bias.

The Mind Is Optimized For General Action, Not Detailed Knowledge Storage

Researchers have found that the human brain is not structured to retain minute details but rather to discard extraneous information to streamline decision-making and general action. This tendency can be seen as advantageous for adaptation and survival, but it can lead to the illusion of knowledge.

Over-Retention of Information Hinders Decision-Making and Navigation

Hyperthymesia is a condition that allows an individual to remember every insignificant detail of their life, providing evidence that the mind is not inherently designed for dense information storage. Rather, the purpose of the mind is to generalize from experiences for practical action. Shankar Vedantam points out that over-reliance on technologies like GPS highlights our brain's inclination toward action rather than retaining every detail about our environment or experiences. He uses the example of a person taking an incorrect shortcut as a demonstration of how we overestimate our navigational capabilities.

Similarly, Phil Fernbach discusses how the human mind evolved to prioritize effective actions over detailed knowledge preservation. By focusing on general principles and structures, our brains are more adept at adapting to various environments and making decisions, though this may come at the cost of creating a false sense of comprehension regarding the inner workings of complex systems.

People Remember Positive Outcomes More Vividly, Fueling Overconfidence

Overconfidence can be fueled by selective memory, especially regarding positive outcomes. Phil Fernbach t ...

Here’s what you’ll find in our full summary

Registered users get access to the Full Podcast Summary and Additional Materials. It’s easy and free!
Start your free trial today

Reasons why the Illusion of Knowledge Occurs

Additional Materials

Clarifications

  • Hyperthymesia, also known as highly superior autobiographical memory (HSAM), is an extremely rare condition where individuals can remember an unusually large number of their life experiences in great detail. People with hyperthymesia often have uncontrollable and vivid memories of personal and public events, with associations triggered by dates or specific cues. This condition is characterized by spending excessive time recalling past events and displaying exceptional recall abilities, providing insights into how memory functions in unique ways in certain individuals.
  • Shankar Vedantam is an American journalist and science correspondent known for his work on human behavior and social sciences. He is recognized for his Hidden Brain series, which includes a book, podcast, and radio program. Vedantam has a background in electronics engineering and journalism, with experience at The Washington Post and Slate. He has received various fellowships and pu ...

Counterarguments

  • While the brain may prioritize general action, it is also capable of storing detailed knowledge when necessary, such as in the case of experts who have deep understanding in specific fields.
  • Over-retention of information can sometimes be beneficial, as in the case of individuals with eidetic memory who can recall information that may unexpectedly become relevant.
  • The reliance on technologies like GPS can also be seen as an extension of the brain's ability to use tools to enhance its capabilities, rather than a sign of its limitations.
  • People's overestimation of their navigational capabilities could also be interpreted as a byproduct of learning and the brain's natural confidence in its abilities, which is necessary for trying new things and learning from mistakes.
  • The prioritization of effective actions over detailed knowledge does not necessarily lead to the illusion of knowledge; it could also lead to a more efficient allocation of cognitive resources.
  • General principles and structures may not always be sufficient for adapting to new environments, especially in complex or specialized fields where detailed knowledge is crucial.
  • Remembering positive outcomes more vividly is not always detrimental; it can also motivate individuals to strive for success and learn from past achievements.
  • The misuse of financial derivatives during the 2008 financial crash cannot solely be attributed to the illusion of knowledg ...

Get access to the context and additional materials

So you can understand the full picture and form your own opinion.
Get access for free
How Much Do We Really Know?

Strategies For Combating the Illusion of Knowledge

Phil Fernbach delves into how people often think they know more than they actually do about complex systems and issues, and how this illusion of knowledge can lead to overconfidence and polarization.

Explaining Technologies, Procedures, and Policies Reveals Understanding Gaps

Fernbach's research shows that when people are challenged to explain mechanisms of political issues in detail, they often discover that their understanding is only surface-level. This revelation can lead to individuals becoming less certain about their previously held confident positions. Although not stated explicitly, the conversation implies that a lack of understanding of technologies can lead one to overestimate their own capability or knowledge. This revelation of incomplete understanding can occur when attempting to explain or outline how something works, thereby shedding light on the actual understanding or lack thereof.

Adopt a Curious, Explanatory Mindset to Reduce Polarization

Fernbach suggests that explanatory discussions can reduce polarization by revealing the complex nature of issues and the gaps in individuals' understanding. He states that such discussions can foster open-mindedness if approached without making participants defensive. Encouraging open-ended questions helps participants to focus on understanding each other's reasoning rather than debating and can lead to more productive interactions.

Considering Unknowns Can Make Us More Modest in Conclusions

The act of explaining and realizing the limits of one's own understanding c ...

Here’s what you’ll find in our full summary

Registered users get access to the Full Podcast Summary and Additional Materials. It’s easy and free!
Start your free trial today

Strategies For Combating the Illusion of Knowledge

Additional Materials

Clarifications

  • The "illusion of knowledge" is a cognitive bias where individuals mistakenly believe they have a deeper understanding of complex topics than they actually do. This overestimation can lead to unwarranted confidence and polarization in beliefs. Recognizing this illusion involves acknowledging gaps in one's understanding and being open to exploring and learning more about the complexities of a subject. By adopting a humble and curious mindset, individuals can mitigate the effects of the illusion of knowledge and engage in more productive discussions.
  • Polarization in the context of understanding gaps refers to how differing levels of comprehension among individuals can lead to extreme and opposing viewpoints on complex issues. When people realize the depth of their knowledge limitations through explanatory discussions, it can reduce the certainty and rigidity of their beliefs, potentially bridging the gap between conflicting perspectives. This process of acknowledging gaps in understanding can foster more nuanced and moderate stances, promoting a more balanced and open-minded approach to discussions and decision-making.
  • Financial derivatives are complex financial instruments whose value is derived from an underlying asset or group of assets. They are used for various purposes like hedging against risks or speculating on market movements. The risks associated with derivatives can sometimes be underestimated due to their intricate nature and the potential for unexpected outcomes, as seen in certain financial crises where the risks were not fully understood. Un ...

Actionables

  • You can deepen your understanding by starting a "Curiosity Journal" where you jot down topics you encounter daily and then spend 15 minutes researching and writing a simple explanation for each. This practice encourages you to recognize gaps in your knowledge and approach learning with humility.
  • Engage in a weekly "Perspective Swap" by having a conversation with someone who has a different viewpoint, focusing on asking open-ended questions to understand their perspective without trying to debate or convince them. This can help you appreciate the complexity of different views and reduce overconfidence in your own beliefs.
  • Create a "Complexity Ma ...

Get access to the context and additional materials

So you can understand the full picture and form your own opinion.
Get access for free

Create Summaries for anything on the web

Download the Shortform Chrome extension for your browser

Shortform Extension CTA