Podcasts > Hidden Brain > Relationships 2.0: Why Did You Do That? + Your Questions Answered: Fred Luskin on Grudges

Relationships 2.0: Why Did You Do That? + Your Questions Answered: Fred Luskin on Grudges

By Hidden Brain Media

In this episode of Hidden Brain, Liane Young and Shankar Vedantam explore theory of mind—our ability to understand that others have different thoughts, beliefs, and intentions than our own. They discuss how this cognitive skill develops in children between ages three and five, and examine its role in helping us navigate social interactions and understand complex narratives in media.

The conversation delves into how theory of mind influences moral judgments and political divisions. Young and Vedantam explain how this cognitive ability can reinforce existing biases, particularly in how we interpret the actions of friends versus strangers, and how it affects our understanding of opposing political views. The discussion includes insights from neuroscience research on the brain regions involved in processing intentions during moral reasoning.

Listen to the original

Relationships 2.0: Why Did You Do That? + Your Questions Answered: Fred Luskin on Grudges

This is a preview of the Shortform summary of the Apr 21, 2025 episode of the Hidden Brain

Sign up for Shortform to access the whole episode summary along with additional materials like counterarguments and context.

Relationships 2.0: Why Did You Do That? + Your Questions Answered: Fred Luskin on Grudges

1-Page Summary

The Nature and Development of Theory of Mind

In this episode, Liane Young and Shankar Vedantam explore theory of mind, our ability to understand that others have different thoughts, beliefs, and intentions than our own. Young explains that this cognitive skill is fundamental to social interaction, helping us navigate conversations and predict others' behavior.

Development in Children

According to Young, explicit theory of mind typically develops between ages three and five. During this period, children begin to understand that others might have different knowledge or beliefs than they do. Vedantam illustrates this with examples of how young children often struggle with "false belief" tasks, while older children grasp that different people have access to different information.

Theory of Mind in Social and Moral Reasoning

Young and Vedantam discuss how theory of mind enables us to understand complex narratives and humor in media. Using "Mrs. Doubtfire" as an example, they explain how audiences track different characters' perspectives and knowledge levels to appreciate the story's irony and humor. Young notes that this ability can be impaired in certain conditions, such as brain damage, psychopathy, or high-functioning autism.

Potential Biases and Limitations

Research has identified the right temporoparietal junction as crucial for processing intentions in moral judgments. Young explains that disrupting this brain region can alter how people judge actions, focusing more on outcomes than intentions. Additionally, Vedantam points out that we often interpret intentions differently for friends versus strangers, showing how theory of mind can reinforce existing biases.

Theory of Mind in Political Divides

In political contexts, Young and Vedantam describe how theory of mind influences group dynamics. They explain that people often attribute their own group's aggressive actions to "in-group love" while seeing similar actions by opponents as "out-group hatred." This tendency can strain personal relationships, particularly when political differences arise within families. Young suggests that while people readily extend the benefit of the doubt to their own circles, they may quickly accept negative interpretations of opponents' actions.

1-Page Summary

Additional Materials

Counterarguments

  • While theory of mind is crucial for social interaction, it is not the only cognitive skill involved; empathy, emotional intelligence, and communication skills also play significant roles.
  • The age range for the development of explicit theory of mind can vary widely among children, and some may develop this ability earlier or later than the typical three to five-year-old range.
  • Understanding complex narratives and humor in media also requires cultural knowledge and language comprehension, not just theory of mind.
  • There are varying degrees of impairment in theory of mind, and not all individuals with conditions like high-functioning autism struggle equally with this cognitive skill.
  • The right temporoparietal junction's role in processing intentions in moral judgments may not be the only neural mechanism involved; other brain regions and networks may also contribute to this complex process.
  • Focusing on outcomes rather than intentions in moral judgments is not inherently incorrect; some ethical frameworks, like consequentialism, prioritize outcomes over intentions.
  • The tendency to interpret intentions differently for friends versus strangers may sometimes lead to more accurate judgments, as we often have more contextual information about friends.
  • Political divides and group dynamics are influenced by a multitude of factors, including but not limited to theory of mind, such as media influence, echo chambers, and confirmation bias.
  • The concept of "in-group love" and "out-group hatred" may oversimplify the complex motivations behind group actions and political stances.
  • Extending the benefit of the doubt to one's own circle while quickly accepting negative interpretations of opponents' actions may sometimes be a rational response to consistent patterns of behavior observed over time.

Actionables

- You can enhance your understanding of others by practicing perspective-taking in everyday conversations, such as asking friends to describe a recent experience and then summarizing their perspective back to them to ensure you've understood it correctly.

  • This strategy helps you actively engage with the concept of theory of mind by putting yourself in someone else's shoes, which can improve your social interactions and empathy. For example, if a friend tells you about a problem at work, try to see the situation from their point of view and the viewpoints of others involved before responding.
  • Try writing short stories from multiple characters' perspectives to better grasp complex narratives and humor, focusing on how each character's knowledge and beliefs influence their actions and reactions.
  • This creative exercise can sharpen your ability to track different perspectives, similar to understanding complex media narratives. For instance, write a scene where two characters witness the same event but interpret it differently based on their personal backgrounds, and explore how this affects their dialogue and decisions.
  • Initiate a 'perspective challenge' with a group of friends or family members where you discuss a contentious topic and everyone must argue from a standpoint that is not their own.
  • This activity can directly address biases and improve group dynamics by forcing participants to consider and articulate the opposing side's viewpoint. For example, during a discussion about a political issue, each person would present arguments from the perspective they typically disagree with, promoting a deeper understanding of differing beliefs and intentions.

Get access to the context and additional materials

So you can understand the full picture and form your own opinion.
Get access for free
Relationships 2.0: Why Did You Do That? + Your Questions Answered: Fred Luskin on Grudges

The Nature and Development of Theory of Mind

Liane Young and Shankar Vedantam delve into the complexities and development of theory of mind, a fundamental aspect of human cognition and social interaction.

Theory of Mind Is Understanding Others Have Differing Thoughts, Beliefs, and Intentions

Liane Young discusses theory of mind, which is our innate ability to understand that others have different thoughts, beliefs, and intentions than our own. According to Young, this cognitive skill plays an essential role even in casual conversations, as it helps us figure out what the other person may want to know and how best to communicate our thoughts.

Capacity to Reason About Others' Mental States Aids In Navigating Social Worlds, Predicting Behavior, and Having Effective Conversations

Shankar Vedantam and Liane Young explain that possessing the capacity to reason about others’ mental states is critical for navigating social environments, predicting behaviors, and engaging in effective communication. Young asserts that recognizing intentions enables us to make sense of events, anticipate future occurrences, and interact with individuals in the present moment, making distinctions between intentional and accidental actions.

Young studies the psychological underpinnings of theory of mind, emphasizing its importance in everyday decisions like whom to befriend, avoid, or hold accountable. Meanwhile, Vedantam describes our intuitive understanding of others’ feelings and desires as a mental "superpower" that plays a role in discerning whether unfortunate incidents occur by chance or with intent.

However, Vedantam notes that our reliance on theory of mind can sometimes lead us astray, resulting in misunderstandings of others' intentions. To counter this, Young highlights the significance of attributing good intentions to others to ensure smoother social interactions and enhance personal well-being. She advises her students to consider that negative interactions may often be the consequence of external factors influencing someone’s mood or behavior, rather than personal malice.

Emergence of Theory of Mind in Ages 3-5: Understanding Divergent Beliefs

Liane Young poi ...

Here’s what you’ll find in our full summary

Registered users get access to the Full Podcast Summary and Additional Materials. It’s easy and free!
Start your free trial today

The Nature and Development of Theory of Mind

Additional Materials

Counterarguments

  • While theory of mind is a critical cognitive skill, it is not the only factor that contributes to effective social interaction; emotional intelligence, empathy, and cultural understanding also play significant roles.
  • The concept of a "mental superpower" may oversimplify the complex and varied ways in which individuals understand and interpret others' mental states.
  • Misunderstandings in social interactions can arise from a variety of sources, not just an overreliance on theory of mind; communication barriers, cultural differences, and personal biases can also contribute.
  • The emphasis on attributing good intentions to others, while generally positive, may overlook the necessity of critical thinking and skepticism in certain situations where discernment is crucial for personal safety or ethical decision-making.
  • The developmental timeline for theory of mind can vary significantly among children, and some individuals, such as those on the autism spectrum, may experience atypical development of ...

Actionables

  • You can practice perspective-taking by writing a short story from two different characters' viewpoints. Start by creating a scenario with a conflict or misunderstanding. Write the story first from one character's perspective, focusing on their thoughts and feelings. Then, rewrite the same story from the other character's point of view. This exercise will help you explore how different beliefs and intentions can shape the interpretation of the same event.
  • Enhance your social interactions by playing a "good intentions" game during conversations. Whenever you're in a discussion and someone says or does something that could be taken negatively, challenge yourself to come up with two positive intentions that could be behind their behavior. This habit can improve your ability to attribute good intentions to others, which can lead to smoother interactions and increased well-being.
  • Develop a deeper understanding of unique perspectives by starting a "pers ...

Get access to the context and additional materials

So you can understand the full picture and form your own opinion.
Get access for free
Relationships 2.0: Why Did You Do That? + Your Questions Answered: Fred Luskin on Grudges

Theory of Mind in Social and Moral Reasoning

Theory of Mind is critical in interpreting social cues, understanding complex narratives, and making moral judgments according to Liane Young and Shankar Vedantam.

Intuiting Intentions Aids In Understanding Complex Narratives and Social Situations

Humor and Irony in Mrs. Doubtfire Scenes Rely On the Audience Tracking Different Character Perspectives and Knowledge

In an analysis of media like "Mrs. Doubtfire," Liane Young and Shankar Vedantam explore how Theory of Mind enables audiences to appreciate complex narratives and humor. The humor and irony in these scenes are based on the audience’s ability to discern the different layers of knowledge among the characters. For example, in "Mrs. Doubtfire," the character Daniel is disguised as Mrs. Doubtfire and has full knowledge of his true relationship with his wife Miranda, while Miranda is not aware that Mrs. Doubtfire is actually her estranged husband Daniel. Audiences find humor in scenes like these because they can track who knows what about whom and intuit the characters' hidden agendas and understandings effortlessly.

Young highlights the importance of perspective-taking in media engagement. She points out the vital role of understanding the characters' perspectives, where the audience often has an omniscient view. This allows viewers to grasp the complex social interaction that characters themselves might not comprehend due to the limitations of their knowledge within the storyline.

Using Theory of Mind to Understand Behaviors and Motivations

In-group Love vs. Out-group Hatred: Impact on Moral Judgments

Young details how Theory of Mind is not always uniformly present among individuals, as some, such as those with brain damage, psychopathy, high-functioning autism, or in contextually challenging situations like Zoom calls, may struggle with ...

Here’s what you’ll find in our full summary

Registered users get access to the Full Podcast Summary and Additional Materials. It’s easy and free!
Start your free trial today

Theory of Mind in Social and Moral Reasoning

Additional Materials

Clarifications

  • Theory of Mind is the ability to understand that others have beliefs, desires, intentions, and emotions that may differ from one's own. It is crucial for successful social interactions and involves attributing mental states to others. Deficits in Theory of Mind can be observed in conditions like autism, schizophrenia, and brain damage, impacting how individuals interpret and respond to social cues. Research on Theory of Mind explores factors influencing this ability, such as language development, cognitive delays, and cultural differences.
  • In-group love vs. out-group hatred is a concept in social psychology that describes how people tend to favor and show positive feelings towards those they perceive as part of their group (in-group), while displaying negative attitudes and hostility towards those perceived as outside their group (out-group). This phenomenon can lead to biases, stereotypes, and even intergroup conflicts based on group identities. Understanding this dynamic is crucial in studying social behaviors, group dynamics, and intergroup relations.
  • High-functioning autism is a term historically used to describe individuals with autism who do not have intellectual disabilities but exhibit challenges in social interaction and communication. It was often applied to verbally fluent individuals with autism who have average or above-average intelligence. However, the term is now considered outdated and not officially recognized in major diagnostic guidelines like the DSM-5.
  • Zoom calls as contextually challenging ...

Counterarguments

  • While Theory of Mind is important, it is not the only factor in interpreting social cues and making moral judgments; other cognitive processes and environmental factors also play significant roles.
  • Some humor and irony can be appreciated without fully understanding or tracking different character perspectives, as physical comedy or absurd situations can be inherently funny.
  • Media engagement and understanding of narratives can also be influenced by cultural context and prior experiences, which might not necessarily require perspective-taking.
  • Theory of Mind might be less relevant in understanding behaviors and motivations in certain situations where actions are more influenced by external factors than by internal mental states.
  • The presence of Theory of Mind among individuals can vary, but this does not necessarily imply a deficit in moral reasoning; alternative cognitive strategies can compensate for differences in Theory of Mind capabilities.
  • Empathy is important, but rational analysis of actions and consequences can also lead to sound moral judgments without relying heavily on empathetic understanding.
  • Situationa ...

Get access to the context and additional materials

So you can understand the full picture and form your own opinion.
Get access for free
Relationships 2.0: Why Did You Do That? + Your Questions Answered: Fred Luskin on Grudges

Theory of Mind May Cause Biases

Liane Young, along with Vedantam, highlight the nuances of Theory of Mind, pointing out how context, individual differences, and even disruptions in specific brain regions impact our moral judgments, and how biases can be reinforced by it.

Misreading Theory of Mind Leads To False Conclusions

Young and Vedantam explore the complexity behind interpreting intentions, discussing the potential for significant consequences when actions are misconstrued.

Disrupting a Brain Region Tied To Processing Intention Alters Moral Judgments, Revealing Our Fragile Intuition of Intentions

Researchers have identified the right temporoparietal junction, located above and behind the right ear, as key to processing information about intentions. Activity in this region correlates with the consideration of intentions in moral judgments. However, when transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is used to disrupt this area, moral judgments change to favor outcomes over intentions. For instance, a story about an attempted poisoning may be viewed as more acceptable if the perpetrator accidentally uses sugar instead of poison, provided the right temporoparietal junction's activity is disrupted. This showcases the fragile nature of our moral intuition.

Young and Vedantam furthermore discuss how small neurochemical changes can alter core elements of one's moral identity. External factors such as environmental influences and cultural differences impact how much people rely on intention information when making moral judgments, suggesting a wide array of determining factors in moral cognition.

We Interpret ...

Here’s what you’ll find in our full summary

Registered users get access to the Full Podcast Summary and Additional Materials. It’s easy and free!
Start your free trial today

Theory of Mind May Cause Biases

Additional Materials

Clarifications

  • Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is a noninvasive technique that uses magnetic fields to stimulate specific areas of the brain. It can help researchers understand brain functions and has therapeutic potential in treating various neurological and mental health conditions. TMS is approved for treating depression in some countries and is known for its diagnostic and therapeutic applications without the need for surgery. The technique involves inducing electric currents in targeted brain regions to modulate brain activity.
  • The right temporoparietal junction (TPJ) is a brain region crucial for processing information about intentions and self-other distinctions. It plays a key role in theory of mind, moral decision-making, and can be affected by disruptions like transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS). Damage or stimulation to the TPJ can impact moral judgments, self-awareness, and contribute to various neurological and psychological disorders.
  • In-group favoritism and out-group bias are social psychology concepts. In-group favoritism is the tendency to favor individuals who belong to the same group as oneself. Out-group bias is the inclination to have negative attitudes or behaviors towards individuals who are perceived as being outside of one's own group. These biases can lead to preferential treatment of in-group members and discrimination against out-group members. They play a role ...

Counterarguments

  • While the right temporoparietal junction is important for processing intentions, it is not the only brain region involved in moral cognition; other areas of the brain also play significant roles, and moral judgments are the result of complex neural networks.
  • The impact of disrupting the right temporoparietal junction with TMS on moral judgments may not be as straightforward or generalizable as suggested, as individual responses to TMS can vary widely.
  • The emphasis on neurochemical changes affecting moral identity might overlook the importance of conscious reasoning and deliberation in moral decision-making.
  • Cultural and environmental influences on moral cognition are complex and may not always lead to predictable changes in how intentions are weighed in moral judgments.
  • The assertion that we interpret others' actions to confirm narratives or preserve self-image could be overly deterministic, as people are capable of critical self-reflection and changing their narratives in light of new information.
  • The idea that there is difficulty in extending compassion and empathy towards others might be too pessimistic, as there are many instances where people do show empathy towards out-group members.
  • The concept of in-group favor ...

Get access to the context and additional materials

So you can understand the full picture and form your own opinion.
Get access for free
Relationships 2.0: Why Did You Do That? + Your Questions Answered: Fred Luskin on Grudges

Theory of Mind in Political and Ideological Divides

Shankar Vedantam, Liane Young, and various sources delve into how our understanding of others' thoughts and sentiments, especially in a political context, can create internal and interpersonal conflict.

Opponents Often Misattribute Intentions, Framing Actions Negatively

Partisan Rancor Hinders Empathy In Political Discourse

Shankar Vedantam introduces the topic by explaining the concept of Theory of Mind within group settings, mentioning 'audience tuning'—how we interpret the sentiments of a group and its approach towards us. Liane Young discusses studies involving both American politics and international conflicts, analyzing how people attribute motives to acts of aggression. Participants frequently attributed aggressive actions by their group to "in-group love," or defending their own, but perceived the same actions by an out-group as "out-group hatred," or attacks.

The ability to perceive intention, as demonstrated by the response to the second plane hitting on September 11, 2001 profoundly influences how events are understood and approached. This precedes a specific discussion on political discourse where there is often a misattribution of negative intentions to opponents’ actions. Vandantam discusses with Young the human tendency to misconstrue the intentions behind political choices, citing a 1988 political attack ad that framed an opponent's actions negatively.

Political Differences Can Strain Personal Relationships

Bridging Divides Needs Perspective-Taking, Vulnerability, and a Desire to Understand Others

In personal scopes, such as a listener named Ezra dealing with familial political discord, the issues become more complex. Ezra struggles to reconcile feelings of love for their family with the pain inflicte ...

Here’s what you’ll find in our full summary

Registered users get access to the Full Podcast Summary and Additional Materials. It’s easy and free!
Start your free trial today

Theory of Mind in Political and Ideological Divides

Additional Materials

Clarifications

  • Theory of Mind is the ability to understand that others have beliefs, desires, intentions, and thoughts different from our own. It is crucial for social interactions and involves attributing mental states to others. Deficits in Theory of Mind can be observed in conditions like autism and schizophrenia. Research explores various factors influencing Theory of Mind, such as language development and brain regions like the prefrontal cortex.
  • In-group and out-group distinctions are social categorizations where individuals perceive others as belonging to either their own group (in-group) or a different group (out-group). In-group members are seen more positively and are often favored, while out-group members may be viewed more negatively or with suspicion. These distinctions can influence attitudes, behaviors, and perceptions towards others. These distinctions can lead to biases, stereotypes, and intergroup conflicts.
  • Queer and transgender rights encompass the rights and protections for individuals who identify as queer or transgender, ensuring equality, non-discrimination, and respect for their identities. This includes legal recognition, healthcare access, protection from discrimination, and the right to live authentically without fear of prejudice or harm. Familial political discord related to queer and transgender rights can arise when family members hold differing views on policies or societal acceptance affecting LGBTQ+ individuals, leading to tensions and conflicts within the family dynamic. Understanding and navigating these differences require empathy, education, and open communication to foster mutual respect and support within the family unit.
  • Assuming good intentions in conversations means approaching interactions with the belief that the other person has positive motives. This mindset can lead to smoother communication as it fosters trust and reduces defensiveness. When both parties assume good intentions, misunderstandings are less likely to escalate into conflicts. It creates a more conducive environment for open dialogue and problem-solving.
  • Forgiveness in relationships not being a binary choice means that it's not simply a matter of either forgiving someone completely or not forgiving them at all. It involves a sp ...

Counterarguments

  • While the text suggests that partisan rancor hinders empathy, it could be argued that in some cases, strong political convictions are a result of deep empathy for certain groups or causes, and that this can sometimes be misinterpreted as a lack of empathy for others.
  • The idea that opponents often misattribute intentions might be countered by the argument that sometimes negative intentions are accurately perceived, and not all negative framing is due to misattribution.
  • The concept of in-group love versus out-group hatred could be challenged by suggesting that individuals are capable of recognizing and condemning aggression by their own group, and that not all attributions are biased by group affiliation.
  • The assertion that political differences strain personal relationships might be met with the counterargument that such strains can also lead to growth and deeper understanding between individuals if navigated thoughtfully.
  • The notion that bridging divides requires perspective-taking, vulnerability, and a desire to understand could be countered by arguing that some divides are based on fundamental moral or ethical differences that cannot be bridged simply through understanding.
  • The idea that people extend the benefit of the doubt to their own circles could be challenged by pointing out that individuals often hold their own group to higher standards and may be more critical of their actions.
  • The claim that conversations flow smoothly when assuming good intentions might be met with the counterargument that some conversati ...

Get access to the context and additional materials

So you can understand the full picture and form your own opinion.
Get access for free

Create Summaries for anything on the web

Download the Shortform Chrome extension for your browser

Shortform Extension CTA