In this episode of the Hidden Brain podcast, the discussion focuses on the differing psychological needs of individuals when confronted with uncertainty. Exploring concepts like the need for closure versus the need for cognition, the hosts delve into how our tolerance for ambiguity shapes our perspectives on complex issues.
They examine how those who crave certainty tend to prefer simple explanations and are more likely to support punitive measures or conservative narratives. Conversely, individuals who can embrace nuance gravitate towards deeper analysis and may view issues through a more systemic lens. The hosts explore the implications of these differences, suggesting that a balanced society needs both those who can thrive amid uncertainty and those who prioritize stability and order.
Sign up for Shortform to access the whole episode summary along with additional materials like counterarguments and context.
Dana Goldthwaite Young's intense reactions to unexpected events, like losing her luggage, suggest a low tolerance for ambiguity and a strong desire for order and predictability. Conversely, her husband Mike's calm response to unexpected health issues indicates a higher tolerance for uncertainty.
According to psychologist Aria Kroglanski, those with a high need for closure favor routine and simple causal explanations, often holding more negative views on complex issues like transgender rights. Dana notes they are more likely to support punitive measures against crime.
Those with a high need for cognition enjoy in-depth analysis and nuanced consideration of multiple perspectives. Shankar Vedantam suggests they are less supportive of harsh criminal punishments, preferring to explore systemic factors.
Individuals high in tolerance for ambiguity tend to appreciate abstract art and open-ended narratives, Vedantam and Dannagal Goldthwaite Young explain. Those high in need for cognition also gravitate towards complex artistic expressions requiring deeper engagement.
Conservative media that presents clear threats and straightforward messaging appeals to audiences high in need for closure and threat-monitoring orientation, in contrast to more ambiguous liberal satire.
A balance between high and low uncertainty tolerance is vital. While those tolerating ambiguity may drive innovation, those preferring certainty provide needed stability and security. Understanding these differences can bridge ideological divides stemming from distinct psychological experiences of the world.
1-Page Summary
Understanding how individuals respond to uncertain situations can offer insights into their personal experiences and relationships. Dana and Mike's reactions to unforeseen challenges reveal differing levels of uncertainty tolerance.
Dana Goldthwaite Young's response to unexpected and uncontrollable events illustrates her discomfort with ambiguity.
When Dana's luggage failed to arrive in Honolulu, her intense stress and anger were indicative of a low tolerance for uncertainty. Despite her husband Mike's practical suggestion to buy immediate needs at Walmart, Dana remained upset and felt out of control for about 24 hours without her belongings, showing her difficulty in adjusting to the change and her desire for predictability.
Even though Mike experienced unexpected medical issues that led to the discovery of a brain tumor, his response to his wife's anxiety suggests he has a higher tolerance for uncertainty. After Dana felt angry and stuck by her inability to cure Mike's condition with surgery, and even aft ...
The influence of uncertainty tolerance on personal experiences and relationships
Dana examines how an individual’s need for closure and need for cognition can shape their views on political and social issues, such as crime and transgender rights.
People with a high need for closure favor routine, order, and predictability. They tend to prefer simple causal explanations and avoid the discomfort of uncertainty and ambiguity. Dana refers to psychologist Aria Kroglanski's scale, which measures need for closure and features agreement with statements that reflect a preference for order and decisiveness.
These individuals are often high threat monitors seeking certain, ordered, and predictable situations. Their low tolerance for ambiguity drives a preference for swift decision-making based on heuristics, emotions, and intuition, rather than deep cognition. Dana notes that a high need for closure is linked to more negative opinions of transgender people and rights, as the concept of gender being fluid can be challenging for individuals who value fixed and definitive categories.
In the context of crime, those high in need for closure are more inclined to support punitive measures as they seek straightforward solutions and are less motivated to consider nuanced explanations.
Fox News and similar media appeal to audiences with a high need for closure by defining clear threats and providing concrete narratives to follow. Additionally, the need for closure is a key factor in the research on belief in conspiracy theories and the susceptibility to misinformation, as such beliefs satisfy the craving for clear and definitive explanations.
Contrastingly, individuals with a high need for cognition relish the investigative process and are less influenced by emotional appeals. Dana points out that these indi ...
The psychological concepts of need for closure and need for cognition, and their relationship to political beliefs
Shankar Vedantam and Dannagal Goldthwaite Young explore how psychological traits like tolerance for ambiguity and need for cognition influence people's appreciation of different forms of art and media.
Vedantam points to "The Lady or the Tiger," a 19th-century short story with an unresolved ending, as an example of how a high tolerance for ambiguity allows some to enjoy narratives that leave conclusions to the imagination. Similarly, Young notes that people with a higher tolerance for ambiguity are drawn to abstract art and stories that eschew clear endings.
Further, Young introduces the concept of need for cognition, revealing that this trait predicts one's enjoyment of complicated artistic expressions, like abstract art and jazz featuring irregular rhythms. This contrasts with the more predictable structures of pop or country music. Most people can appreciate realistic art, but a particular appreciation for abstract art is associated with those higher in tolerance for ambiguity and need for cognition.
Tapping into the realm of media, it's noted ...
The role of psychological traits in shaping aesthetic preferences and media consumption
Understanding that individuals have differing psychological capacities to handle uncertainty can lead to a profound appreciation of how these variations shape our society. An intricate balance between those with high and low tolerances for ambiguity can contribute to the health and stability of communities, influencing everything from progress to security.
A society composed entirely of individuals who tolerate ambiguity may foster high levels of innovation and exploration, reveling in the new and the untested. Such a community could experience a flowering of creativity, with less fear of the unknown leading to groundbreaking advancements in science, art, and culture. However, the other side of this coin is that without a proportionate sense of caution, such a society might neglect the safety measures necessary to protect against external threats.
On the other hand, a society dominated by individuals with a high need for closure might prioritize order, consistency, and security, thus ensuring a stable and predictable environment. This preference for a structured, safe setting can lead to a solid defense against potential dangers and a reliable societal framework. Yet, this same need for certainty and stability may stifle creativity and discourage the very exploration and innovation that drive progress.
The societal implications of diverse psychological capacities to deal with uncertainty
Download the Shortform Chrome extension for your browser