Podcasts > Hidden Brain > Sitting With Uncertainty

Sitting With Uncertainty

By Hidden Brain Media

In this episode of the Hidden Brain podcast, the discussion focuses on the differing psychological needs of individuals when confronted with uncertainty. Exploring concepts like the need for closure versus the need for cognition, the hosts delve into how our tolerance for ambiguity shapes our perspectives on complex issues.

They examine how those who crave certainty tend to prefer simple explanations and are more likely to support punitive measures or conservative narratives. Conversely, individuals who can embrace nuance gravitate towards deeper analysis and may view issues through a more systemic lens. The hosts explore the implications of these differences, suggesting that a balanced society needs both those who can thrive amid uncertainty and those who prioritize stability and order.

Listen to the original

Sitting With Uncertainty

This is a preview of the Shortform summary of the Sep 30, 2024 episode of the Hidden Brain

Sign up for Shortform to access the whole episode summary along with additional materials like counterarguments and context.

Sitting With Uncertainty

1-Page Summary

Uncertainty Tolerance and Personal Experiences

Dana Goldthwaite Young's intense reactions to unexpected events, like losing her luggage, suggest a low tolerance for ambiguity and a strong desire for order and predictability. Conversely, her husband Mike's calm response to unexpected health issues indicates a higher tolerance for uncertainty.

Need for Closure vs. Need for Cognition

According to psychologist Aria Kroglanski, those with a high need for closure favor routine and simple causal explanations, often holding more negative views on complex issues like transgender rights. Dana notes they are more likely to support punitive measures against crime.

Those with a high need for cognition enjoy in-depth analysis and nuanced consideration of multiple perspectives. Shankar Vedantam suggests they are less supportive of harsh criminal punishments, preferring to explore systemic factors.

Aesthetic Preferences and Traits

Individuals high in tolerance for ambiguity tend to appreciate abstract art and open-ended narratives, Vedantam and Dannagal Goldthwaite Young explain. Those high in need for cognition also gravitate towards complex artistic expressions requiring deeper engagement.

Conservative media that presents clear threats and straightforward messaging appeals to audiences high in need for closure and threat-monitoring orientation, in contrast to more ambiguous liberal satire.

Implications for Society

A balance between high and low uncertainty tolerance is vital. While those tolerating ambiguity may drive innovation, those preferring certainty provide needed stability and security. Understanding these differences can bridge ideological divides stemming from distinct psychological experiences of the world.

1-Page Summary

Additional Materials

Counterarguments

  • People with a low tolerance for ambiguity can also be innovative and adaptable in structured environments.
  • Mike's calmness in the face of health issues might not solely be due to a high tolerance for uncertainty but could also be influenced by other personality traits or coping mechanisms.
  • A high need for closure does not necessarily correlate with negative views on complex issues; individuals may still hold progressive views while preferring decisiveness and clarity.
  • Enjoying in-depth analysis does not always mean a person is less supportive of harsh criminal punishments; one could argue for stringent measures based on detailed, nuanced reasoning.
  • Appreciation for abstract art and open-ended narratives is not exclusive to those with a high tolerance for ambiguity; it can also be a matter of personal taste or cultural exposure.
  • People high in need for cognition might still enjoy simple or less complex artistic expressions for relaxation or entertainment purposes.
  • Conservative media's appeal to those high in need for closure does not imply that all conservative media lacks nuance or that all consumers of conservative media have a low tolerance for ambiguity.
  • Bridging ideological divides requires more than understanding psychological differences; it also involves addressing social, economic, and political factors that influence beliefs and behaviors.

Actionables

  • You can explore your own tolerance for ambiguity by engaging with different art forms, starting with a visit to a contemporary art museum to see how you react to abstract pieces.
  • By exposing yourself to art that doesn't have a clear or obvious meaning, you'll get a sense of your comfort level with ambiguity. If you find yourself intrigued and wanting to learn more, you might have a higher tolerance for ambiguity. If you're frustrated or disinterested, you might prefer more structure and clarity.
  • Try reading a variety of news sources with differing political perspectives to challenge your need for closure and understand how it shapes your worldview.
  • This exercise can help you recognize your own biases and how your need for closure might influence the media you consume. If you find yourself uncomfortable with the differing viewpoints, it might indicate a higher need for closure. Conversely, if you're energized by the debate and complexity, you may have a lower need for closure and a higher need for cognition.
  • Engage in conversations with people who have different life experiences and beliefs to see how you handle ideological differences.
  • This can be as simple as striking up a conversation with a coworker or joining a community group. Pay attention to how you feel when your views are challenged. Do you seek to understand the other person's perspective, or do you want to convince them of your own? This can reveal how your tolerance for uncertainty affects your interpersonal relationships and can help you develop empathy and understanding across ideological divides.

Get access to the context and additional materials

So you can understand the full picture and form your own opinion.
Get access for free
Sitting With Uncertainty

The influence of uncertainty tolerance on personal experiences and relationships

Understanding how individuals respond to uncertain situations can offer insights into their personal experiences and relationships. Dana and Mike's reactions to unforeseen challenges reveal differing levels of uncertainty tolerance.

Dana's reaction to unexpected challenges and unpredictable situations reveals her low tolerance for ambiguity.

Dana Goldthwaite Young's response to unexpected and uncontrollable events illustrates her discomfort with ambiguity.

Dana's distress when her luggage did not arrive in Hawaii, and her subsequent difficulty adjusting to the unexpected circumstances, demonstrate her preference for order and predictability.

When Dana's luggage failed to arrive in Honolulu, her intense stress and anger were indicative of a low tolerance for uncertainty. Despite her husband Mike's practical suggestion to buy immediate needs at Walmart, Dana remained upset and felt out of control for about 24 hours without her belongings, showing her difficulty in adjusting to the change and her desire for predictability.

Dana's husband Mike's ability to accept and adapt to random events helps him cope better with the uncertainty surrounding his health condition.

Mike's calm and pragmatic response to Dana's anxiety over his brain tumor diagnosis reflects his higher tolerance for ambiguity compared to Dana.

Even though Mike experienced unexpected medical issues that led to the discovery of a brain tumor, his response to his wife's anxiety suggests he has a higher tolerance for uncertainty. After Dana felt angry and stuck by her inability to cure Mike's condition with surgery, and even aft ...

Here’s what you’ll find in our full summary

Registered users get access to the Full Podcast Summary and Additional Materials. It’s easy and free!
Start your free trial today

The influence of uncertainty tolerance on personal experiences and relationships

Additional Materials

Counterarguments

  • Dana's intense reaction to the lost luggage might not solely indicate a low tolerance for ambiguity but could also be a response to the immediate inconvenience and potential loss of personal items, which can be stressful for many people regardless of their general tolerance for uncertainty.
  • Mike's calm demeanor in the face of his health condition might not be entirely due to a higher tolerance for ambiguity; it could also be influenced by coping mechanisms, support systems, or a philosophical outlook on life that is not fully explored in the text.
  • The text may oversimplify the complexity of human reactions to uncertainty by attributing behaviors to a single trait (tolerance for ambiguity) without considering other psychological factors, such as past experiences, personality, and context.
  • Dana's difficulty in adjusting to the unexpected circumstances could be seen as a normal reaction to stress rather than an inherent low tolerance for ambiguity, and with time and support, she might adapt more effectively.
  • The comparison between Dana and Mike's reactions to uncertainty might not account for individual differences in expressing stress and coping with health-related iss ...

Actionables

  • You can increase your tolerance for ambiguity by starting a 'Surprise Day' where you deliberately leave your schedule open and make spontaneous decisions. This could involve taking a different route to work, trying a new restaurant without looking at reviews, or picking a book to read at random. The goal is to become more comfortable with the unknown and learn to enjoy the process of discovery.
  • Develop adaptability by engaging in role-playing scenarios that simulate unexpected situations. For example, you could role-play with a friend where one of you acts as a traveler who has lost their luggage, and the other offers solutions. This practice can help you think on your feet and become more resilient in the face of real-life unpredictable challenges.
  • Enhance your acc ...

Get access to the context and additional materials

So you can understand the full picture and form your own opinion.
Get access for free
Sitting With Uncertainty

The psychological concepts of need for closure and need for cognition, and their relationship to political beliefs

Dana examines how an individual’s need for closure and need for cognition can shape their views on political and social issues, such as crime and transgender rights.

Individuals with a high need for closure tend to prefer clear-cut solutions and are less comfortable with ambiguity.

People with a high need for closure favor routine, order, and predictability. They tend to prefer simple causal explanations and avoid the discomfort of uncertainty and ambiguity. Dana refers to psychologist Aria Kroglanski's scale, which measures need for closure and features agreement with statements that reflect a preference for order and decisiveness.

These individuals are often high threat monitors seeking certain, ordered, and predictable situations. Their low tolerance for ambiguity drives a preference for swift decision-making based on heuristics, emotions, and intuition, rather than deep cognition. Dana notes that a high need for closure is linked to more negative opinions of transgender people and rights, as the concept of gender being fluid can be challenging for individuals who value fixed and definitive categories.

In the context of crime, those high in need for closure are more inclined to support punitive measures as they seek straightforward solutions and are less motivated to consider nuanced explanations.

Those high in need for closure are more likely to support punitive measures in response to crime, as they seek simple causal explanations rather than considering complex systemic factors.

Fox News and similar media appeal to audiences with a high need for closure by defining clear threats and providing concrete narratives to follow. Additionally, the need for closure is a key factor in the research on belief in conspiracy theories and the susceptibility to misinformation, as such beliefs satisfy the craving for clear and definitive explanations.

People with a high need for cognition enjoy thinking through problems in depth and are more open to considering multiple perspectives.

Contrastingly, individuals with a high need for cognition relish the investigative process and are less influenced by emotional appeals. Dana points out that these indi ...

Here’s what you’ll find in our full summary

Registered users get access to the Full Podcast Summary and Additional Materials. It’s easy and free!
Start your free trial today

The psychological concepts of need for closure and need for cognition, and their relationship to political beliefs

Additional Materials

Counterarguments

  • The correlation between need for closure and negative opinions of transgender people might not be causal; other factors such as cultural background, religious beliefs, or personal experiences could also play significant roles.
  • The relationship between need for closure and support for punitive measures might be more complex, with other variables like personal values, moral beliefs, or legal perspectives influencing one's stance on crime and punishment.
  • The appeal of media like Fox News to individuals with a high need for closure could be oversimplified; viewers might also be drawn to such media due to ideological alignment, social identity, or perceived credibility.
  • The link between need for closure and susceptibility to conspiracy theories might not account for the full spectrum of reasons why people believe in such theories, which can include distrust in authorities, social reinforcement, or a sense of community.
  • The characterization of individuals with a high need for cognition as less likely to endorse punitive measures may not consider the diversity within this group, where some may still support punitive responses based on their interpretation of evidence or justice principles.
  • The suggestion that high need for cognition individuals are more analytical and evidence-based might not acknowledge th ...

Actionables

- You can challenge your comfort with ambiguity by reading a book or watching a movie with an open ending and then discussing your feelings and thoughts about the unresolved elements with a friend. This encourages you to confront discomfort with ambiguity and practice being okay with not having all the answers.

  • Start a 'perspective journal' where you write down a current event each week and then research and note down multiple viewpoints on the issue. This habit not only broadens your understanding but also trains you to appreciate the complexity of different perspectives, reducing the reflex to seek simple causal explanations.
  • Engage in a 'debate exchange' with a pe ...

Get access to the context and additional materials

So you can understand the full picture and form your own opinion.
Get access for free
Sitting With Uncertainty

The role of psychological traits in shaping aesthetic preferences and media consumption

Shankar Vedantam and Dannagal Goldthwaite Young explore how psychological traits like tolerance for ambiguity and need for cognition influence people's appreciation of different forms of art and media.

Individuals with a higher tolerance for ambiguity tend to appreciate abstract art and narratives with open-ended conclusions.

Vedantam points to "The Lady or the Tiger," a 19th-century short story with an unresolved ending, as an example of how a high tolerance for ambiguity allows some to enjoy narratives that leave conclusions to the imagination. Similarly, Young notes that people with a higher tolerance for ambiguity are drawn to abstract art and stories that eschew clear endings.

People who are high in need for cognition also gravitate towards more complex, challenging artistic works that require deeper engagement and interpretation.

Further, Young introduces the concept of need for cognition, revealing that this trait predicts one's enjoyment of complicated artistic expressions, like abstract art and jazz featuring irregular rhythms. This contrasts with the more predictable structures of pop or country music. Most people can appreciate realistic art, but a particular appreciation for abstract art is associated with those higher in tolerance for ambiguity and need for cognition.

The psychological traits of need for closure and threat-monitoring orientation are associated with a preference for media content that delivers clear-cut, emotional, and didactic messaging.

Tapping into the realm of media, it's noted ...

Here’s what you’ll find in our full summary

Registered users get access to the Full Podcast Summary and Additional Materials. It’s easy and free!
Start your free trial today

The role of psychological traits in shaping aesthetic preferences and media consumption

Additional Materials

Counterarguments

  • The correlation between psychological traits and aesthetic preferences may not be as strong or direct as suggested; other factors such as cultural background, education, and personal experiences also play significant roles in shaping preferences.
  • The complexity of a work of art or media is subjective and can be perceived differently by individuals, regardless of their need for cognition.
  • The enjoyment of abstract art or complex artistic expressions is not exclusive to those with high tolerance for ambiguity or need for cognition; people may appreciate these forms for their emotional impact or aesthetic qualities alone.
  • The association between need for closure and preference for clear-cut media content may not account for the nuanced reasons individuals consume conservative media, such as community identity or political beliefs.
  • The dichotomy presented between the preferences of audiences for conservative versus liberal media oversimplifies the spectrum of political beliefs and media consumption habits.
  • The implication that pop or country music is inherently ...

Actionables

  • Explore your psychological traits by creating personalized art playlists that mix various genres and styles, then note which ones resonate with you and which don't. By doing this, you'll get a clearer picture of your tolerance for ambiguity and need for cognition. For example, include a mix of abstract paintings, complex classical music, and films with open-ended narratives in your playlist, and after each experience, jot down your feelings and thoughts.
  • Challenge your media preferences by intentionally consuming content that differs from your usual choices for a week and observe your reactions. If you typically enjoy straightforward, emotionally charged stories, try a documentary on a complex scientific subject or a film with a non-linear storyline. Keep a diary to track how you feel before, during, and after the experience to see if your preferences or tolerance levels change.
  • Host a small, informal art discussion group with f ...

Get access to the context and additional materials

So you can understand the full picture and form your own opinion.
Get access for free
Sitting With Uncertainty

The societal implications of diverse psychological capacities to deal with uncertainty

Understanding that individuals have differing psychological capacities to handle uncertainty can lead to a profound appreciation of how these variations shape our society. An intricate balance between those with high and low tolerances for ambiguity can contribute to the health and stability of communities, influencing everything from progress to security.

A healthy society requires a balance between individuals with high and low tolerance for ambiguity, as each offers unique strengths and weaknesses.

A society composed entirely of individuals who tolerate ambiguity may foster high levels of innovation and exploration, reveling in the new and the untested. Such a community could experience a flowering of creativity, with less fear of the unknown leading to groundbreaking advancements in science, art, and culture. However, the other side of this coin is that without a proportionate sense of caution, such a society might neglect the safety measures necessary to protect against external threats.

On the other hand, a society dominated by individuals with a high need for closure might prioritize order, consistency, and security, thus ensuring a stable and predictable environment. This preference for a structured, safe setting can lead to a solid defense against potential dangers and a reliable societal framework. Yet, this same need for certainty and stability may stifle creativity and discourage the very exploration and innovation that drive progress.

Understanding the psychological drivers behind political and cultural divi ...

Here’s what you’ll find in our full summary

Registered users get access to the Full Podcast Summary and Additional Materials. It’s easy and free!
Start your free trial today

The societal implications of diverse psychological capacities to deal with uncertainty

Additional Materials

Clarifications

  • Psychological capacities to handle uncertainty refer to individuals' varying abilities to cope with situations that lack clear information or outcomes. This can include how comfortable someone is with ambiguity, risk, and unpredictability in their lives. People with high tolerance for uncertainty may embrace novelty and change, while those with low tolerance may seek stability and predictability. Understanding these differences can shed light on how individuals navigate challenges and make decisions in various aspects of life.
  • Tolerance for ambiguity is the ability to handle situations or information that are unclear, complex, or uncertain without feeling stressed or anxious. Individuals with high tolerance for ambiguity are comfortable with uncertainty and are more open to new experiences and ideas. On the other hand, those with low tolerance for ambiguity prefer clear, structured situations and may feel uneasy when faced with ambiguity or unpredictability. This psychological trait can influence how people approach decision-making, problem-solving, and risk-taking in various aspects of their lives.
  • The "need for closure" is a psychological concept referring to an individual's desire for definite answers and aversion to ambiguity. People with a high need for closure seek clear, certain conclusions and may feel uncomfortable with uncertainty. This trait can influence decision-making, problem-solving, and how individuals navigate complex or ambiguous situations. Understanding this aspect of personality can shed light on how people approach challenges, interact with others, and engage with the world around them.
  • Understanding the psychological drivers behind political and cultural divides involves recognizing how individuals' comfort levels with uncertainty influence their beliefs and values. People with different psychological tendencies may approach uncertainty in distinct ways, shaping their perspectives on issues like governance, social norms, and identity. These psychological differences can lead to varying attitudes towards change, risk-taking, and the need for structure in society. By acknowledging these diverse psychological drivers, we can better comprehend the roots of disagreements and work towards bridging gaps in understanding between different groups.
  • Ideological differences related to psychological tendencies suggest that individuals' varying comfort levels with uncertainty influence their political and cultural beliefs. For example, those more open to ambiguity may embrace c ...

Counterarguments

  • The assumption that a balance between high and low tolerance for ambiguity is necessary for a healthy society may not account for the complexity of societal health, which can be influenced by numerous factors beyond individual psychological capacities.
  • The idea that a society tolerant of ambiguity will necessarily foster high levels of innovation may overlook the role of other factors such as education, economic stability, and political freedom in driving progress.
  • The suggestion that a community with less fear of the unknown will experience a flowering of creativity does not consider that some individuals or cultures may thrive by finding creative solutions within structured environments.
  • The argument that a lack of caution in an ambiguity-tolerant society might lead to neglect of safety measures assumes a direct correlation between tolerance for ambiguity and risk management, which may not always hold true.
  • The claim that a society with a high need for closure will ensure a stable and predictable environment may not take into account the potential for such a society to become rigid and unable to adapt to change.
  • The idea that a preference for structure and safety necessarily stifles creativity and innovation may not recognize that constraints can sometimes inspire rather than inhibit creative thinking.
  • The notion that understanding psychological drivers can help bridge political and cultural divides might be overly optimistic, as such divides are often rooted in deep-seated values and interests that may not be easily reconciled through understanding alone.
  • The perspective that recognizing comfort with ambiguity can foster empathetic communication may not address the potenti ...

Get access to the context and additional materials

So you can understand the full picture and form your own opinion.
Get access for free

Create Summaries for anything on the web

Download the Shortform Chrome extension for your browser

Shortform Extension CTA