In this episode from the "Good Inside with Dr. Becky" podcast, Becky Kennedy provides insight on addressing parenting disagreements where one partner doubts the "Good Inside" approach. She suggests skepticism stems from care about a child's future and can lead to constructive dialogue.
Kennedy explains the "Good Inside" approach—balancing boundaries with compassion to guide behavior change while affirming a child's inherent goodness. She advocates open discussions with skeptical partners, not as an effort to convince, but to understand criticisms and find agreeable strategies without judgment.
Sign up for Shortform to access the whole episode summary along with additional materials like counterarguments and context.
Becky Kennedy suggests skepticism from a parenting partner about the "Good Inside" approach shows curiosity and concern for their children's future, according to Kennedy. She appreciates open discussions of differing beliefs, as they can lead to better strategies for raising kids.
Kennedy explains the "Good Inside" approach aims for balance: not punishment that confuses a child's identity with their behavior, nor permissiveness that lacks boundaries. Instead, it maintains boundaries while connecting to the child's goodness and developing better behavior skills.
Per Kennedy, parents using "Good Inside" lead with calm conviction and affirm their child's inherent goodness while collaborating to understand underlying feelings and change behaviors through supportive boundaries.
Kennedy says to evaluate parenting approaches beyond just immediate behavioral changes. Look for signs like:
Kennedy acknowledges having a skeptical partner can feel adversarial and burdensome for the parent using "Good Inside" methods.
Kennedy suggests inviting skeptical partners to listen and discuss "Good Inside" together through resources like podcasts or workshops. Not to convince, but to have open dialogue on criticisms, with the presenter and skeptical partner providing input.
1-Page Summary
Becky Kennedy approaches the challenge of dealing with skeptical parenting partners, offering insight into how skepticism can be a positive force in parenting.
Kennedy suggests that skeptical partners questioning the "Good Inside" parenting approach are, in fact, a boon. She appreciates skepticism because it is linked to curiosity, implying that the skeptical party is thinking deeply about important issues. Kennedy admires this trait, as it shows a deep concern for their children's future and a desire to ensure the parenting methods used truly prepare them for the challenges of the real world.
Kennedy contends that bringing skeptical partners into the conversation about parenting approaches like "Good Inside" can be highly beneficial. She encourages open discussions where ...
Reframing a Skeptical Parenting Partner As a Positive
Kennedy introduces the "Good Inside" approach, contrasting it with traditional methods, aiming to balance discipline and compassion.
Kennedy explains contrasting reactions to a child’s negative behavior. She contrasts the traditional reaction, which often involves punishment and negative labels, with the "Good Inside" approach.
In a traditional punishment-first response, a parent might react solely to a child's behavior. Kennedy states that this mindset could worry about what is wrong with the child, leading parents to discipline in the moment without considering the long-term impact. The child's bad behavior might make them seem "bad" to the parent, resulting in punishment that could relieve parental frustration short-term but may not have long-term effectiveness. Research suggested punishment's immediate emotional expression doesn't correlate with valuable long-term behavioral change.
Kennedy also cautions against an overcorrection, where a parent is so focused on their child’s feelings that it results in a lack of boundaries. A purely feelings-focused reaction, she says, fails to hold the child accountable for their behavior, making the parent a container for frustrations without setting limits.
Kennedy advocates for a balanced "Good Inside" approach, which aims to recognize a child's inherent goodness while offering them the chance to understand their behavior and develop better skills.
The "Good Inside" approach is neither soft nor permissive; it focuses on being calm and avoiding reactivity. Kennedy explains that although this requires parents to manage their emotions without the relief of reacting, the approach leads to better outcomes and connections with the chi ...
"Explaining the 'Good Inside' Parenting Approach and Its Differences"
Kennedy opens up a discussion on the complexities of evaluating the success of parenting methods, suggesting that it’s not just about immediate results but also about what is happening beneath the surface over time.
Kennedy compares the process of assessing behavioral changes in children to observing a child learn how to swim. She emphasizes that while we can see some changes, like how they can hold their breath or move their arms better, much of their progress, such as developing confidence or overcoming fear, happens where we can't see it. She warns against giving up on a parenting approach too quickly just because the change isn’t overtly visible, reminding us that real learning and growth often occur beneath the surface.
Kennedy urges parents to reflect on whether they genuinely believe in the child's learning methods being used. This belief is essential because it is the foundation upon which the child builds their skills.
She also encourages parents to look for incremental signs of improvement as an indication that the methods are effective, even if there aren’t any groundbreaking or immediate changes. These small steps forward are crucial ...
Evaluating if a Parenting Approach "Works"
Kennedy explores strategies for managing parenting approach differences that can often feel adversarial and burdensome for one parent when dealing with a skeptical partner.
Kennedy expresses understanding that having a partner who is skeptical of the "Good Inside" parenting approach can be exhausting and frustrating. She acknowledges that it can often feel like one partner is shouldering the majority of the parenting work and is intent on addressing this issue.
In a situation with a skeptical parenting partner, the differences can seem adversarial and may disproportionately burden one parent.
Kennedy offers a way forward - to invite skeptical partners to listen together, which can help make the relationship less adversarial and reinforce the idea that both parents are on the same team.
Kennedy discusses the potential for opening dialogue with skeptical partners. She suggests the idea of using podcasts or workshops as a platform for these discussions. The intent is to not convince skeptical partners, but rather to have open conversations about common concerns, fears, and criticisms of the "Good Inside" ap ...
Addressing Challenges With a Skeptical Parenting Partner
Download the Shortform Chrome extension for your browser