Podcasts > Dan Carlin's Hardcore History > Show 57 - Kings of Kings II

Show 57 - Kings of Kings II

By Dan Carlin's Hardcore History

In this episode of Dan Carlin's Hardcore History, the impact of absolute power on rulers throughout history is explored. Carlin contrasts leaders like Cyrus the Great with his son Cambyses, who may have succumbed to tyrannical tendencies. The challenges of leadership transitions and theories surrounding the shift from Cambyses to Darius are also examined.

The podcast delves into the military strategies and cultural differences that shaped the ancient Greek-Persian wars. Carlin analyzes how the Greeks viewed this conflict as a fight for freedom against the centralized Persian autocracy. He explores the factors that allowed the Greeks to resist Persian conquest and develop traditions influential to Western civilization.

Listen to the original

Show 57 - Kings of Kings II

This is a preview of the Shortform summary of the Mar 20, 2016 episode of the Dan Carlin's Hardcore History

Sign up for Shortform to access the whole episode summary along with additional materials like counterarguments and context.

Show 57 - Kings of Kings II

1-Page Summary

The Psychological Impact of Absolute Power

Dan Carlin explores the challenges rulers face in wielding absolute power without succumbing to detrimental mental states like megalomania and paranoia. He suggests that few leaders throughout history could handle such unchecked authority over long periods.

Cyrus the Great vs. Cambyses

While Cyrus the Great built a vast empire, his son Cambyses inherited dangerous levels of absolute power. According to Carlin and historian Will Durant, this may have driven Cambyses to instability and tyrannical behavior like executing his brother and committing atrocities against Egyptians.

However, Risa Sargami notes that modern scholarship contrasts with Herodotus's portrayal of Cambyses as cruel, suggesting the notion of "absolute power corrupts absolutely" is overly simplistic. Some rulers like Darius the Great practiced restraint to govern effectively.

Challenges of Leadership Succession

The transition from Cyrus to Darius highlights the volatility of power shifts in ancient empires. Despite Cyrus's efforts to ensure a smooth transfer to Cambyses, uncertainty surrounded Cambyses's death.

Darius claimed an imposter seized power, providing his rationale for taking the throne. Carlin explores various theories around this transition, which Darius portrayed through carvings asserting divine right and noble lineage. Darius then restructured the empire to prevent future turmoil, suggesting the rise of an oligarchy.

Persian and Greek Military Forces

The podcast examines the Persian military's combined arms approach relying heavily on archers, cavalry hit-and-run tactics, and an effective navy. This differed from the Greek hoplite phalanx of heavily-armored citizen infantry.

At Marathon, the Greeks employed strategy like thinning the phalanx's center to counter Persian numbers. Factors like terrain, proximity, and psychological forces like fear also impacted ancient battles.

Cultural Clash Behind the Wars

Beyond the military engagements, the Greek-Persian wars represented an ideological clash between the centralized Persian autocracy and the emerging Greek democracies valuing freedoms.

Greek historians like Herodotus portrayed Greeks as protagonists defending Western civilization. Victory at Marathon allowed Athens to develop cultural and political traditions influential to the modern West.

The ongoing rivalry between the powers shaped the ancient Mediterranean world. While Persia displayed imperial resilience, Greek resistance stemmed from a cultural drive for liberty and prevented Persian conquest of Europe.

1-Page Summary

Additional Materials

Clarifications

  • Absolute power can lead to megalomania and paranoia when individuals in positions of unchecked authority become obsessed with their own greatness and develop extreme distrust or suspicion of others. Megalomania is a psychological condition where a person has delusions of grandeur and an exaggerated sense of their own importance. Paranoia involves irrational beliefs of being persecuted or conspired against, often leading to a heightened sense of vigilance and mistrust. These mental states can be exacerbated when individuals have no limits on their power, potentially leading to destructive behaviors and decisions.
  • Cyrus the Great was a Persian ruler known for creating a vast empire based on tolerance and respect for diverse cultures. Cambyses, his son, succeeded him but faced challenges and is often depicted as a tyrant in historical accounts. Darius the Great, who followed Cambyses, stabilized the empire and implemented administrative reforms to strengthen Persian rule. These figures played significant roles in shaping ancient Persian history and its interactions with other civilizations.
  • The combined arms approach in the ancient Persian military referred to their strategy of utilizing various types of troops and tactics in coordination during battles. This included archers for ranged attacks, cavalry for mobility and hit-and-run tactics, and a navy for naval engagements. By combining these different arms effectively, the Persians aimed to create a versatile and formidable fighting force that could adapt to different battlefield situations. This approach contrasted with the Greek hoplite phalanx, which relied heavily on heavily-armored infantry fighting in a close formation.
  • The Greek hoplite phalanx was a formation used in ancient Greek warfare, consisting of heavily-armored citizen infantry standing closely together in a line or block formation. Hoplites were equipped with a large round shield (aspis), a spear, and a helmet, emphasizing defense and cohesion in battle. The phalanx formation allowed for a strong, unified front in combat, relying on the collective strength and discipline of the soldiers. This formation was a key element in Greek military tactics and played a significant role in battles such as those against the Persian forces.
  • The ideological clash between Persian autocracy and Greek democracies during the Greek-Persian wars stemmed from differing political systems. Persia was ruled by a centralized autocratic government where power was concentrated in the hands of a single ruler or a small group. In contrast, Greek city-states like Athens valued democratic principles, where citizens had a say in decision-making through assemblies and voting. This clash represented a fundamental difference in governance philosophies and ideals between the two civilizations.
  • The Greek victory at Marathon in 490 BC was a pivotal moment in history, as it halted the Persian invasion of Greece. This triumph boosted Greek morale and demonstrated the effectiveness of Greek military tactics. It also solidified Athens' reputation as a leading city-state and contributed to the development of democratic ideals in ancient Greece. The legacy of this victory influenced subsequent Greek cultural and political developments, shaping the foundation of Western civilization.

Counterarguments

  • The idea that few historical leaders could handle unchecked absolute power may be challenged by noting that historical records often emphasize the negative aspects of rulers, potentially overlooking those who wielded power effectively without succumbing to corruption or tyranny.
  • The assertion that Cambyses succumbed to instability and tyranny could be countered by considering that historical accounts, especially from ancient times, may be biased or incomplete, and alternative explanations for his behavior could exist, such as political maneuvering or misinformation by his enemies.
  • While modern scholarship offers a contrast to Herodotus's portrayal of Cambyses, it's important to recognize that interpretations of historical figures can vary widely based on the evidence available and the prevailing scholarly perspectives, which can change over time.
  • The claim that some rulers like Darius the Great practiced restraint might be nuanced by considering that what may appear as restraint could also be strategic governance aimed at maintaining power and control, rather than a moral choice.
  • The volatility of power shifts from Cyrus to Darius could be seen in a different light if one considers the possibility of propaganda and self-serving narratives in Darius's accounts of his rise to power.
  • The suggestion that Darius's restructuring of the empire led to the rise of an oligarchy could be debated by arguing that his reforms may have been intended to create a more sustainable and efficient administration rather than concentrating power among a few elites.
  • The effectiveness of the Persian military's combined arms approach could be critiqued by pointing out that while it was successful in many instances, it also had vulnerabilities, as evidenced by defeats like the Battle of Marathon.
  • The Greek hoplite phalanx's effectiveness could be challenged by noting that this military formation had limitations in certain terrains and against certain tactics, which were sometimes exploited by their enemies.
  • The ideological clash between Persian autocracy and Greek democracies might be oversimplified, as there were variations in governance within both Greek city-states and the Persian Empire that do not fit neatly into these categories.
  • The claim that Greek resistance prevented Persian conquest of Europe could be contested by arguing that Persian strategic interests and internal dynamics played a significant role in the extent of their expansion, not just Greek resistance.

Get access to the context and additional materials

So you can understand the full picture and form your own opinion.
Get access for free
Show 57 - Kings of Kings II

The Nature of Absolute Power and Its Psychological Effects on Rulers

The psychological impact of absolute power on rulers has been a subject of debate and historical scrutiny. The stories of Cyrus the Great and his son Cambyses highlight the adversity of wielding unchecked authority and its potential to corrupt or drive rulers into tyranny and madness.

Absolute power presents a severe psychological challenge for rulers, as history shows that very few can handle it without succumbing to megalomania, paranoia, and other detrimental mental states.

Dan Carlin proposes a question about the human ability to handle absolute power without losing one’s mind, suggesting a rarity in such capacity. He acknowledges that power might ebb at a person's mental stability over decades, despite any initial aptitude for leadership. Carlin also indicates that while powerful rulers often avoided insanity, there were notorious cases such as Hitler, who suffered from megalomania and paranoia, possibly due to Parkinson's disease or drug effects, and Alexander the Great, whose paranoia and megalomania could be attributed to severe alcoholism.

Cyrus the Great created a vast empire, but his son Cambyses inherited a dangerous amount of absolute power that may have driven him to instability and tyranny.

Will Durant contrasts Cyrus the Great's character with that of Cambyses, stating that while Cambyses inherited his father's cruelty, he lacked Cyrus's generosity. Cambyses' tyrannical behavior during his reign is well-documented. He began with executing his brother and rapidly expanded his power through the conquest of Egypt. Herodotus recounts that Cambyses committed acts of significant cruelty, such as degrading and punishing both Egyptian people and their religious beliefs, which ultimately led the Egyptians to believe that Cambyses was punished by the gods when he fell ill.

The idea that "absolute power corrupts absolutely" is a common belief, but the fact that many rulers throughout history were able to maintain their sanity and continue governing effectively suggests this notion may be too simplistic.

Historians like Risa Sargami contemplate the peculiarities of historical narratives, including the official account of Cambyses’ insanity. Modern scholarship, contrasting Herodotus's portrayal, finds evidence to suggest that Cambyses may not have been the cruel ruler as once thought, with Egyptian records indicating that he performed all due rites upon the natural death of the Apis bull, which symbolizes continuity rather than turmoil in his policy.

Und ...

Here’s what you’ll find in our full summary

Registered users get access to the Full Podcast Summary and Additional Materials. It’s easy and free!
Start your free trial today

The Nature of Absolute Power and Its Psychological Effects on Rulers

Additional Materials

Clarifications

  • Cambyses' reign has been subject to contrasting views in historical narratives. While some accounts depict him as a cruel and tyrannical ruler, modern scholarship suggests a more nuanced perspective, indicating that he may not have been as malevolent as previously believed. These differing interpretations highlight the complexities of historical storytelling and the importance of considering multiple sources and perspectives when evaluating the actions and character of historical figures.
  • Darius, who succeeded Cambyses as the ruler of the Persian Empire, shifted the leadership style from harsh and impulsive actions to a more calculated and thoughtful approach. He emphasized the importance of reason, self-control, and foresight in governance, moving away from the excessive cruelty and unpredictabil ...

Counterarguments

  • The psychological effects of absolute power can vary greatly depending on the individual's personality, upbringing, and the sociopolitical context, suggesting that not all rulers with absolute power will necessarily exhibit megalomania or paranoia.
  • The idea that absolute power inevitably leads to negative psychological states could be an oversimplification, as it does not account for those who may have used their power benevolently or wisely.
  • The historical accounts of rulers like Cambyses are often based on sources that may not be entirely reliable or objective, and modern reinterpretations could provide a more nuanced understanding of their reigns.
  • The assertion that Hitler's and Alexander the Great's psychological states were due to health issues or substance abuse is speculative and may not fully explain the complexity of their behaviors and decisions.
  • The phrase "absolute power corrupts absolutely" is a maxim and not a universally applicable truth; it may not hold true in every case and could be challenged by examples of absolute rulers who did not b ...

Get access to the context and additional materials

So you can understand the full picture and form your own opinion.
Get access for free
Show 57 - Kings of Kings II

The challenges of leadership succession and power transitions in ancient empires

The Persian Empire's transition from Cyrus the Great to Darius the Great illuminates the precarious nature of leadership succession and the potential volatility of power transitions within ancient empires.

Cyrus the Great carefully planned for a smooth transition of power to his designated heir, Cambyses, recognizing the precarious nature of succession in the ancient Near East.

Carlin outlines that Cyrus the Great worked diligently to ensure a seamless transition of power to Cambyses. Cyrus trained Cambyses to take over the empire, giving him on-the-job training as Viceroy of Babylon, and having him spend time with the army. Additionally, to prevent a conflict of succession, Cyrus provided his younger son, Bardiya, with a significant territory in Central Asia, along with monetary benefits, while still subjecting him to Cambyses.

However, despite Cyrus' foresight, Cambyses' reign was marred by uncertainty. The transition was initially seamless but subsequent events became so corrupted that historians have had to work backward from the end of his reign to truly understand its beginning. There were allegations of conspiracy and cover-ups, indicating challenges in the stability and portrayal of Cambyses' reign, similar to conspiracy narratives that surround the assassination of John F. Kennedy.

The uncertain circumstances surrounding Cambyses' death and the subsequent rise of Darius the Great demonstrate the complex political maneuvering and potential for unrest during power transitions in ancient empires.

Cambyses had no heirs, which complicated the succession after his death. Additionally, Cambyses' harsh behaviors, erratic actions, and policies, like reducing funding for the Egyptian priesthood, may have compounded his unpopularity. Darius claimed that an imposter named Gaumata, assuming Bardiya's identity, had seized power, and he organized an assassination squad to dispose of the usurper. This narrative was central to Darius’s claim to the throne and led to his efforts to reorganize the empire's power structure to prevent future uncertainty in succession.

Carlin suggests various scenarios surrounding the power transition from Cambyses to Darius, with the histori ...

Here’s what you’ll find in our full summary

Registered users get access to the Full Podcast Summary and Additional Materials. It’s easy and free!
Start your free trial today

The challenges of leadership succession and power transitions in ancient empires

Additional Materials

Counterarguments

  • The effectiveness of Cyrus's preparations for succession could be questioned, as the subsequent turmoil suggests that the measures taken were not sufficient to ensure a stable transition.
  • The narrative of Cambyses' reign being marred by uncertainty could be re-examined in light of alternative historical interpretations that may offer a more nuanced view of his leadership and policies.
  • The claim that Darius rose to power by overcoming an imposter could be scrutinized, considering some historians argue that this narrative was a political fabrication by Darius to legitimize his own rule.
  • The assertion that Darius's reforms and projects marked a significant change in Persian history might be contested by pointing out that some reforms may have been continuations or adaptations of policies from previous rulers.
  • The idea that Darius's efforts to create a stab ...

Actionables

  • You can create a personal succession plan for your responsibilities, ensuring a smooth transition in case of unexpected events. Start by documenting your daily tasks, identifying key skills needed for each, and training a trusted person to handle these tasks. This could be as simple as teaching a family member to manage household bills or a colleague to oversee a project at work.
  • Develop a personal contingency plan to address potential challenges in your life. Think about what uncertainties you might face, such as job loss or health issues, and outline steps to mitigate these risks. For example, you could create an emergency savings fund or invest in insurance policies that provide coverage for such eventualities.
  • Engage in storytelling to share your pe ...

Get access to the context and additional materials

So you can understand the full picture and form your own opinion.
Get access for free
Show 57 - Kings of Kings II

The military strategies, tactics, and battlefield experiences of the Persian and Greek armies

In examining the tactical variety and battlefield dynamics, the podcast reflects on the differences between the Persian and Greek military forces and how these shaped their encounters.

The Persian army's reliance on archers and combined arms approach, including effective use of cavalry, made it a formidable force against its opponents.

Dan Carlin traces the evolution of the Persian military forces and their use of a larger number of archers inherited from their predecessors, the Assyrians. By fielding this devastating missile barrage, the Persian army's infantry formation became particularly effective against large mounted forces. Nigel Tallis says Persians followed an Elamite tradition of maximizing the number of archers over shielded spearmen, unlike the Assyrians’ 50-50 ratio.

Carlin delves into the effectiveness of Persian cavalry tactics, likening them to the combat styles of the Scythians, Huns, and Mongols—emphasizing their hit-and-run approach with missile weapons. Persian infantry would follow up, mopping up disorganized or weakened enemy formations. The Persian army was a combined arms force, maximizing the effectiveness of their cavalry in concert with their infantry. Their strategy included rationalizing the reduction of close combat troops in favor of more archers, with the cavalry complementing the missile firepower. Even a 50,000-man Persian army could unleash two million arrows in twenty minutes, underscoring the force's reach and diversity.

Additionally, the Persians utilized their naval capabilities and prowess with the Phoenician fleet to project power across the Aegean, posing a significant existential threat to the Greek city-states. Herodotus emphasized their efficient multi-regional force assembly and advanced preparations for amphibious assaults.

The Greek hoplite phalanx, composed of heavily armored citizen-soldiers, developed a unique fighting style that proved effective against the Persians in certain engagements.

The Greek hoplite phalanx, described by Carlin as a civic militia consisting of citizens like farmers, artisans, and politicians, featured heavily armed and armored infantrymen who did not require extensive training to operate effectively. The phalanx's configuration, with well-regarded warriors stationed at the front and rear, and less experienced troops sandwiched in the middle, resembled a part of a machine. The disciplined formation could accommodate soldiers of different ages, allowing the collective to move as one unit with controlled movements.

Close shoulder-to-shoulder formations allowed the phalanx to act like an "irresistible steamroller" on flat terrain, but uneven terrain could disrupt their ranks. Carlin notes the inherent fear in ancient warfare’s close quarters, where combat often involved spears and swords, and how such psychological f ...

Here’s what you’ll find in our full summary

Registered users get access to the Full Podcast Summary and Additional Materials. It’s easy and free!
Start your free trial today

The military strategies, tactics, and battlefield experiences of the Persian and Greek armies

Additional Materials

Counterarguments

  • The effectiveness of the Persian archers could be mitigated by weather conditions, such as strong winds or rain, which are not mentioned in the text.
  • The comparison of Persian cavalry tactics to those of the Scythians, Huns, and Mongols may overlook significant differences in time periods, geography, and cultural tactics that could affect the validity of the comparison.
  • The Persian strategy of reducing close combat troops in favor of archers may not have been universally effective, as it could leave them vulnerable to enemy forces that closed the distance quickly.
  • The Greek phalanx's effectiveness is highlighted without acknowledging that it was not invincible and had its own weaknesses, such as being outmaneuvered by more mobile forces or being less effective in rough terrain.
  • The text implies that the Greek hoplite phalanx did not require extensive training, which may understate the discipline and coordination necessary to maintain such formations in battle.
  • The psychological factors of fear and panic are emphasized in the Greek victory at Marathon, but the text does not consider the possibility that the Persians also experienced and capitalized on similar psychological warfare.
  • The role of Greek gods like "Phobos" and "Pan" in influencing battles could be seen as a symbolic re ...

Actionables

  • You can analyze team projects or group dynamics by identifying the roles of different members, akin to the Persian army's combined arms approach, to optimize overall performance. For instance, in a group project, assign roles based on each member's strengths—someone good at research can gather information, a creative person can work on the presentation, and a detail-oriented person can proofread and check for errors. This way, each member's skills complement the others, much like how the Persian archers and cavalry supported each other.
  • Enhance your problem-solving skills by adopting the Greek phalanx strategy of placing the strongest elements at the front and rear of a process. When tackling a complex task, start by addressing the most challenging parts with your full energy (the front), then deal with the easier sections (the middle), and finally, review and refine your work with a critical eye (the rear). This approach ensures that you're applying your best efforts where they're most needed and maintaining quality throughout.
  • Improve your adaptability by observing ...

Get access to the context and additional materials

So you can understand the full picture and form your own opinion.
Get access for free
Show 57 - Kings of Kings II

The broader cultural and historical context of the conflict between the Persian Empire and ancient Greece

The conflict between the Persian Empire and ancient Greece was more than a series of battles; it was a clash of cultures and ideologies with significant long-term implications. Dan Carlin sheds light on the deep-seated cultural tensions and political rivalries that underpinned this epochal period.

The clash between the Persian Empire and the Greek city-states was not merely a military confrontation, but a collision of contrasting cultural, political, and societal values.

The Persian Empire, with its centralized autocratic rule, stood in stark contrast to the emerging Greek democracies, particularly Athens, which valued individual freedoms and political participation.

The Persian Empire, as described in the podcast, had a reach that extended to the edges of the known world, encompassing diverse territories under its centralized rule, from modern-day Pakistan to the lands of the Greeks. Darius the Great, notable for expanding Persian authority to the east, signified the vast power of this empire. Meanwhile, Athens was testing the nascent institution of democracy, emphasizing individual freedoms and political participation, a sharp contrast to Persian autocracy.

The Greek playwrights and historians, such as Herodotus, used the conflict with the Persians to explore themes of cultural identity, the dangers of tyranny, and the resilience of the Greek city-states in the face of a powerful foe.

Herodotus, often referred to as the "Father of History," portrayed the Greeks as the protagonists in this struggle, the "home team" of western civilization, against the Persian "visiting team." Greek playwrights and historians used the conflict to reflect on themes of tyranny and freedom, as well as to celebrate Greek resiliency and valor. This narrative, such as Herodotus's dramatic account of the battle of Marathon, was crafted to resonate with Greek identity and cultural pride.

The outcome of the Greek-Persian Wars had far-reaching implications, not only for the immediate participants but also for the broader course of Western civilization.

The Greek victory at Marathon and other key battles allowed Athens and other city-states to maintain their autonomy and continue to develop their cultural, political, and intellectual traditions, which would later have a profound influence on the Western world.

The tangible fear Greeks had for Persians, evident in Herodotus's narrative prior to the battle at Marathon, was alleviated by the decisive victory the Greeks achieved. The disproportionate number of Persian casualties at Marathon and the autonomous preservation of cities like Athens enabled the flourishing of Greek culture, which significantly shaped Western civilization.

The ongoing rivalry and intermittent conflicts between the Greek city-states and the Persian Empire shaped the geopolitical landscape of the ancient Medit ...

Here’s what you’ll find in our full summary

Registered users get access to the Full Podcast Summary and Additional Materials. It’s easy and free!
Start your free trial today

The broader cultural and historical context of the conflict between the Persian Empire and ancient Greece

Additional Materials

Counterarguments

  • The portrayal of the conflict as a simple dichotomy between autocracy and democracy may overlook the complexity of Persian governance, which included elements of federalism and local autonomy for various ethnic groups within the empire.
  • The emphasis on the Greek victory and its implications for Western civilization might understate the influence of Persian culture and administrative innovations on the Greeks and later societies.
  • The narrative that Greek victories prevented Persian expansion into Europe could be challenged by the argument that the Persian Empire's focus shifted to other fronts and internal consolidation rather than a lack of ability to conquer Greece.
  • The idea that the Greek city-states were united in their resistance against Persia can be countered by pointing out the frequent infighting and alliances with Persia by some Greek states, suggesting a more complex political landscape.
  • The depiction of Greek democracy, particularly in Athens, as a model of individual freedom may be critiqued by noting that it excluded women, slaves, and non-citizens from political participation.
  • The assertion that the Greek victories allowed for the uninterrupted development of Western cultural and intellectual traditions might be contested by noting that many of these traditions were not linear and were influenced by multiple cultures, including the Persians.
  • The claim that the Persian Empire's strategies included negotiation and regime change as a sign of their flexible governance could be seen as an oversimplification of Persian imperial policies, which also involved significant military campaigns ...

Actionables

  • You can deepen your understanding of cultural conflicts by comparing modern international relations to the Persian-Greek conflict, identifying parallels in political strategies and cultural exchanges.
  • By examining current news articles and international policies, look for instances of negotiation, power struggles, and cultural influences. For example, consider how a modern country's foreign policy might reflect centralized power or democratic values, akin to the Persian Empire or ancient Greece.
  • Enhance your appreciation for resilience and adaptation by documenting personal setbacks and recovery strategies in a journal.
  • Reflect on challenges you've faced, whether in your career, education, or personal life, and write down how you've overcome them. This mirrors the Persian Empire's recovery after setbacks, and it can help you identify your own patterns of resilience and growth.
  • Explore the impact of historical events on your own cultural identity by creating a family history project that traces the influences ...

Get access to the context and additional materials

So you can understand the full picture and form your own opinion.
Get access for free

Create Summaries for anything on the web

Download the Shortform Chrome extension for your browser

Shortform Extension CTA