Podcasts > Conspiracy Theories > D.B. Cooper Pt. 2

D.B. Cooper Pt. 2

By Spotify Studios

The Conspiracy Theories podcast covers the infamous DB Cooper skyjacking case, where a hijacker using an alias parachuted from a Seattle-bound plane with $200,000 in ransom money in 1971. Sanger-Katz details the FBI's extensive but unsuccessful investigation into potential suspects like Richard McCoy, Kenneth Christiansen, and Robert Rackstraw, whose background and skills drew attention from citizen sleuths.

The episode also explores how private investigators like Tom Colbert have conducted their own inquiries, identifying suspects like Rackstraw through circumstantial evidence and witness statements. Despite citizen efforts, law enforcement has been unwilling to reopen the case without significant new evidence surfacing, leaving DB Cooper's identity and the fate of the ransom money unresolved to this day.

D.B. Cooper Pt. 2

This is a preview of the Shortform summary of the Sep 25, 2024 episode of the Conspiracy Theories

Sign up for Shortform to access the whole episode summary along with additional materials like counterarguments and context.

D.B. Cooper Pt. 2

1-Page Summary

The DB Cooper Hijacking and FBI Investigation

On November 24th, 1971, a man using the alias DB Cooper hijacked a Seattle-bound Boeing 727, parachuting away with $200,000 in ransom money and disappearing without a trace.

DB Cooper, the alias of an unidentified hijacker, executed a carefully planned skyjacking. As Sanger-Katz explains, he boarded a Seattle flight and hijacked it, demanding $200,000 in ransom and four parachutes. After receiving the money in Seattle, Cooper leapt from the plane over the Pacific Northwest, never to be seen again. The FBI, despite profiling potential military-trained suspects, failed to identify Cooper or recover the stolen cash, making this America's only unsolved air piracy case.

Potential Suspects and Their Connections

Richard McCoy, a former Green Beret, carried out a strikingly similar hijacking months after DB Cooper's, fueling suspicion he may have been involved in both crimes. However, physical discrepancies with eyewitness accounts led the FBI to largely dismiss him.

Kenneth Christiansen, a former military parachutist and Northwest Orient Airlines flight attendant, was proposed as a suspect by his brother. Circumstantial evidence like a tie found on the plane and property he purchased near the suspected drop zone raised suspicion, though the FBI felt he didn't match Cooper's profile.

Robert Rackstraw, a former Army sergeant, caught citizen sleuths' attention due to his striking resemblance to Cooper sketches. His military training and criminal history established potential connections, but the FBI found insufficient proof against him.

Citizen Sleuths' Theories and Investigations

Tom Colbert, a private investigator, conducted an extensive personal investigation, identifying Robert Rackstraw as the likely DB Cooper based on DNA evidence, coded letters, and witness testimonies regarding his background and skills. However, the FBI dismissed Colbert's claims, unwilling to reopen the case barring concrete evidence like the parachute or ransom cash being found.

Despite tireless efforts by citizen sleuths, the FBI remains firm in its refusal to resume the DB Cooper investigation without major new evidence surfacing. The hijacker's true identity and fate of the stolen ransom money remain elusive to this day.

1-Page Summary

Additional Materials

Counterarguments

  • The idea that DB Cooper executed a "carefully planned" skyjacking could be challenged by arguing that certain aspects of the hijacking, such as the choice of escape method, were inherently risky and may not have been the most carefully considered.
  • The assertion that the FBI failed to identify DB Cooper could be countered by suggesting that the FBI may have identified a suspect but lacked sufficient evidence for a conviction, or that they chose not to disclose information to the public.
  • The connection between Richard McCoy and DB Cooper based on the similarity of their crimes could be criticized by pointing out that copycat crimes are not uncommon, and similarity alone does not establish identity.
  • The suspicion cast on Kenneth Christiansen could be countered by arguing that circumstantial evidence is not conclusive and that the FBI's assessment of him not matching Cooper's profile may have been based on solid investigative work.
  • The focus on Robert Rackstraw could be criticized by noting that citizen sleuths may be subject to confirmation bias, interpreting evidence to fit their theories rather than drawing conclusions from objective analysis.
  • The confidence in Tom Colbert's identification of Rackstraw as DB Cooper could be challenged by questioning the reliability and interpretation of the DNA evidence, coded letters, and witness testimonies he used.
  • The FBI's refusal to reopen the case could be criticized as overly rigid, suggesting that even without the parachute or ransom cash, other forms of new evidence could potentially be significant enough to warrant further investigation.
  • The idea that the case remains unsolved could be met with the alternative view that the hijacker may have been identified or apprehended under a different name or for a different crime, and thus the case could be indirectly solved.

Actionables

  • You can enhance your problem-solving skills by creating a mystery game night with friends, where you design a scenario inspired by unsolved cases and collectively try to solve it, thereby practicing critical thinking and deduction.
    • Gather a group of friends and present them with a fictional unsolved mystery that has parallels to the DB Cooper case, such as a heist or a disappearance. Provide clues, red herrings, and witness statements for them to analyze. This activity can sharpen your analytical abilities and attention to detail, as you work together to piece together the puzzle, much like investigators would in a real case.
  • You can improve your research abilities by starting a blog where you analyze unsolved mysteries, using open-source information to draw connections and propose theories.
    • Choose an unsolved case that interests you and start a blog where you document your research process, the sources you find, and the theories you develop. This will help you learn how to sift through information, evaluate evidence, and present your findings in a coherent manner. It's a way to practice the same skills that investigators and journalists use when they're piecing together a story from fragments of evidence.
  • You can develop your critical thinking by writing a short story or novella inspired by the elements of the DB Cooper case, focusing on creating a plausible plot and realistic characters.
    • Use the basic outline of an unsolved crime like the DB Cooper hijacking as a template for your story. As you write, pay attention to crafting a logical sequence of events and well-developed characters whose actions and motivations are believable. This exercise can help you understand the complexity of real-life cases and improve your ability to think critically about human behavior and decision-making.

Get access to the context and additional materials

So you can understand the full picture and form your own opinion.
Get access for free
D.B. Cooper Pt. 2

The DB Cooper hijacking and FBI investigation

On November 24th, 1971, a man using the alias Dan Cooper hijacked a Seattle-bound Boeing 727 and executed one of the most mysterious episodes in the annals of American crime.

In 1971, a man calling himself "Dan Cooper" hijacked a Seattle-bound flight and parachuted to safety with $200,000 in ransom money

Using the demands typical of skyjackings of the era, DB Cooper called for $200,000 and four parachutes. Cooper's unique approach included avoiding promotion of any radical beliefs, using non-violence, and ensuring no passengers were harmed. After receiving his ransom at Seattle-Tacoma International Airport and additional precise demands for the plane's operation, Cooper plunged from the aircraft over the dense wilderness of the Pacific Northwest, leaping into legend.

The FBI, who continued their investigation well past skyjacker Richard McCoy's apprehension and death, never managed to identify DB Cooper or recover the complete sum of the stolen money. Suspects were profiled as probable military-trained men, with specific knowledge of parachutes, flight operations, and the local terrain suggested by Cooper's interaction during the hijacking.

The hijacker, known as DB Cooper, demanded a ransom of $200,000 and four parachutes, then jumped from the plane mid-flight and disappeared without a trace

Cooper's precise instructions and evident preparation suggested a careful methodology, but his fate remains a matter of speculation. Some suggest he may not have survived the perilous nighttime jump, and possibly his remains and the bulk of the ransom lie undiscovered, reclaimed by nature.

The FBI conducted a decades-long i ...

Here’s what you’ll find in our full summary

Registered users get access to the Full Podcast Summary and Additional Materials. It’s easy and free!
Start your free trial today

The DB Cooper hijacking and FBI investigation

Additional Materials

Actionables

  • You can explore the art of storytelling by writing a short story or novella inspired by the DB Cooper hijacking, focusing on creating a compelling mystery that leaves readers guessing. Use the elements of the case to craft your characters and plot, ensuring you invent new scenarios and resolutions that diverge from the real-life event.
  • Develop critical thinking skills by analyzing the DB Cooper case as a hypothetical scenario in a game night with friends. Create a board game or a set of cards with different theories and evidence, where players can debate and deduce possible outcomes, enhancing their ability to evaluate information and make logical arguments.
  • Enhance your problem-solving abilities by setting up a mock in ...

Get access to the context and additional materials

So you can understand the full picture and form your own opinion.
Get access for free
D.B. Cooper Pt. 2

Potential suspects and their connections to the crime

The mysterious case of D.B. Cooper remains a captivating enigma, and over the years, several individuals have been suspected of being the infamous hijacker. Their connections to the crime have sparked debates, investigations, and conflicting theories.

Richard McCoy, a former Green Beret and experienced parachutist, carried out a nearly identical hijacking several months after DB Cooper

Richard McCoy, a former Green Beret, was identified through an anonymous tip as the perpetrator of a hijacking that occurred five months after the DB Cooper case, using a method almost identical to Cooper’s. McCoy, who possessed military training and expertise, included being a pilot, a demolition expert, and a skilled parachutist, could have potentially carried out both hijackings. His sister-in-law and mother-in-law recognized the unique black clip-on tie left on Flight 305 as being similar to McCoy's style. Despite this, doubts about his involvement were fueled by his younger age, notably his smooth-faced appearance at 29, which conflicted with the middle-aged description of Cooper.

Kenneth Christiansen, a Northwest Orient Airlines flight attendant in his 40s, was proposed as a suspect by his brother

Kenneth Christiansen, a former military parachutist and Northwest Orient Airlines flight attendant, was another suspect proposed when his brother suggested he could be DB Cooper. Christiansen had all the prerequisite skills and knowledge, along with a history of jumping out of planes for fun during his military service in Japan. The physical evidence included a black tie, similar to one Christiansen would wear, found on Flight 305 and the acquisition of a house near the suspected landing zone of Cooper within a year following the hijacking. After Christiansen's death in 1994, a hidden collection of newspaper clippings about Northwest Orient Airlines ending just before the hijacking was also found. Despite these intriguing connections, the FBI insisted the hijacking was not an inside job and dismissed him largely due to discrepancies in physical characteristics compared to eyewitness descriptions of Cooper.

Robert Rackstraw, a former Army sergeant with a criminal history, was investigated ...

Here’s what you’ll find in our full summary

Registered users get access to the Full Podcast Summary and Additional Materials. It’s easy and free!
Start your free trial today

Potential suspects and their connections to the crime

Additional Materials

Counterarguments

  • Richard McCoy
    • McCoy's involvement is speculative, as there is no definitive evidence linking him to the DB Cooper case.
    • The physical description of McCoy does not match eyewitness accounts of DB Cooper, who was described as middle-aged, whereas McCoy was 29 at the time.
    • McCoy's own hijacking, while similar, could be a copycat crime rather than evidence of his guilt in the DB Cooper case.
  • Kenneth Christiansen
    • Christiansen's connection to the crime is largely circumstantial, with no direct evidence proving his involvement.
    • The FBI dismissed Christiansen as a suspect, suggesting that the physical discrepancies between him and the descriptions of Cooper were significant.
    • The fact that Christiansen was a flight attendant does not necessarily imply he had the capability or inclination to commit the hijacking.
  • Robert Rackstraw
    • The FBI concluded there was insufficient ...

Actionables

  • Dive into the world of unsolved mysteries by starting a journal where you document your thoughts and theories on famous cases. As you learn about cases like DB Cooper's, write down your hypotheses, sketch out timelines, and compare them with other historical events or cases you come across. This can enhance your critical thinking and research skills.
  • Create a simple code-breaking game using free online tools to challenge your friends and family. Inspired by the cryptic nature of the DB Cooper case, you can craft messages with hidden meanings or clues that need to be deciphered, fostering a fun and engaging way to develop problem-solving abilities.
  • Engage in a role-playing exercise ...

Get access to the context and additional materials

So you can understand the full picture and form your own opinion.
Get access for free
D.B. Cooper Pt. 2

Theories and investigations by citizen sleuths

Citizen sleuth Tom Colbert and others have fervently pursued the true identity of the infamous skyjacker known as DB Cooper, but their endeavors have clashed with the FBI's reluctance to reopen the case.

Tom Colbert, a private investigator, launched his own extensive investigation into the DB Cooper case and identified Robert Rackstraw as the likely perpetrator

Tom Colbert, a private investigator, and his documentary team carried out a deep investigation into the DB Cooper hijacking, identifying Robert Rackstraw as the probable suspect. They collected DNA samples, examined hidden codes in letters that were supposedly penned by Cooper, and gathered testimony from people who claimed to be former associates of Rackstraw.

Colbert found numerous circumstantial connections between Rackstraw's background and the details of the hijacking, including his military service, parachute training, and criminal history

Colbert discovered various circumstantial links tying Rackstraw's background to the specifics of the DB Cooper case. Rackstraw's military service, parachute training, and criminal history appeared to align with details known about the hijacker.

Colbert presented his evidence to the FBI, but they declined to reopen the investigation, leading Colbert to accuse the Bureau of a cover-up

After mounting evidence, Colbert presented his findings to the FBI, but the Bureau was unmoved. They informed him that the DB Cooper case was no longer active and would only reconsider if crucial evidence like the missing parachute or cash with matching serial numbers turned up. This reaction spurred Colbert to allege that the FBI was covering up information, specifically regarding Rackstraw's alleged clandestine activities with the CIA in Vietnam.

After a FOIA lawsuit, a federal judge compelled the FBI to release their DB Cooper files. Tom Colbert's team pored over thousands of pages, declaring ...

Here’s what you’ll find in our full summary

Registered users get access to the Full Podcast Summary and Additional Materials. It’s easy and free!
Start your free trial today

Theories and investigations by citizen sleuths

Additional Materials

Counterarguments

  • Circumstantial evidence is not conclusive proof, and the identification of Robert Rackstraw as DB Cooper by Tom Colbert's team may not meet the legal or investigative standards required for the FBI to act upon it.
  • The FBI's reluctance to reopen the case could be due to a lack of actionable evidence rather than a cover-up, as the agency typically requires a high standard of evidence to pursue a case.
  • Accusations of a cover-up by the FBI could be unfounded and may detract from the credibility of the citizen sleuths' investigation.
  • The release of the FBI's DB Cooper files may not necessarily validate Tom Colbert's conclusions about Rackstraw; the interpretation of the documents could be subjective.
  • The ongoing investigations by citizen sleuths, while commendable for their dedication, may not have access to all ...

Actionables

  • You can enhance your problem-solving skills by researching a historical mystery and developing a hypothesis based on available information. Start by choosing a lesser-known unsolved case, gather all the public records and news articles you can find, and then use critical thinking to piece together a plausible explanation. This exercise will sharpen your analytical abilities and attention to detail.
  • Improve your understanding of legal processes by filing a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request on a topic of personal interest. Identify a government-held piece of information you're curious about, learn the FOIA request process, and submit your application. This will give you practical experience in navigating bureaucratic systems and understanding your rights to access information.
  • Cultivate a community of like-minded ent ...

Get access to the context and additional materials

So you can understand the full picture and form your own opinion.
Get access for free

Create Summaries for anything on the web

Download the Shortform Chrome extension for your browser

Shortform Extension CTA