In this episode of Aware & Aggravated, psychologist Leo Skepi explores the anxiety surrounding judgment and how our assumptions shape these fears. He explains that our formative experiences of criticism, especially from family, condition us to expect harsh judgments from others, even if unwarranted. Skepi also discusses how our innate need for social acceptance makes us fear rejection and negative evaluations.
Skepi provides insight on reframing our perspective on judgment. He advises assuming potential positive judgments and viewing fears as signs of growth, not threats. Additionally, Skepi emphasizes embracing the coexistence of praise and criticism, reflecting our complexities as individuals beyond confining stereotypes and self-judgments.
Sign up for Shortform to access the whole episode summary along with additional materials like counterarguments and context.
Psychologist Leo Skepi explores the anxiety surrounding judgment, explaining that our assumption that judgment will be negative fuels our fears. In reality, Skepi notes, both positive and negative judgments are possible - the same qualities others criticize could be admired by some.
Skepi traces fears of judgment back to formative experiences of criticism, especially from family. Being conditioned to expect harsh judgments makes us assume any perception will be negative, even if unwarranted.
Humans are biologically wired for social approval, Skepi says. From infancy, we crave caregiver approval vital to survival. This innate need for belonging makes us fear rejection and judgments.
Although we can't control others' thoughts, Skepi asserts we control the assumptions behind our anxiety. He advises assuming potential positive judgments and viewing fears as signs of growth, not threats.
Skepi emphasizes the duality of perception - we all receive mixed judgments reflecting our complexities. Allowing this contradictory coexistence of praise and criticism liberates us from confining stereotypes and self-judgments.
1-Page Summary
Leo Skepi explores the anxiety surrounding judgment and challenges the notion that being judged by others is predominantly a negative experience. He explains that our fear of judgment is often rooted in the assumption that it will always be negative, while in reality, people can perceive us positively as well.
Skepi suggests that individuals commonly fear judgment because they assume it will be negative, an assumption often based on past experiences of criticism. However, people may also admire qualities in us that others judge harshly.
Skepi delves into how people tend to assume others are judging them negatively in public over things like their appearance or behavior. This perception is influenced by experiences where one might have only faced negative judgments, leading to expectations that all judgments will follow suit.
Discussing his own fear of judgment about getting tattoos, which his father strongly disapproved of, Skepi suggests that observers can have polar opposite reactions. While some might find tattoos objectionable, others could see them as an expression of individuality and admire them.
He shares experiences of being mocked for his hairline and the ease with which people can criticize without understanding the context. Yet Skepi emphasizes that the same qualities that invite ridicule could also be viewed with admiration by others who perhaps see confidence in action such as dining alone or the self-expression reflected in body art.
Skepi point ...
The nature of judgment and how we assume others will judge us
The fear of judgment many individuals face in adulthood can often be traced back to their formative years, where repeated negative experiences, especially within the family, set the stage for anticipating criticism in their interactions with others.
Negative influences in childhood, such as being constantly criticized by parents or having one's flaws singularly highlighted, can deeply condition an individual to expect and fear harsh judgments from others.
For instance, someone might step out in a perfect outfit only to have a relative comment on a pimple, completely overlooking their effort and appearance. Such experiences reinforce the belief that being perceived by anyone will inevitably result in negative judgment.
How past experiences shape our fear of judgment
Psychologist Leo Skepi underscores the biological and evolutionary roots of humans’ inherent need for social acceptance and approval.
According to Skepi, humans are by nature oriented toward seeking acceptance and approval. This drive can be traced back to the time of our ancestors for whom being part of a social group was critical for survival.
Illustrating the underlying mechanisms, Skepi underscores that, from birth, a child’s need for approval from caregivers is particularly compelling. This dependency emerges because this approval equates to receiving care and support essential for the child’s survival.
Sk ...
The psychological and social factors underlying the need for acceptance
Understanding how to cope with and reframe one’s perspective on the judgments of others can be pivotal in reducing anxiety related to perceptions and criticisms.
Leo Skepi strongly believes that although we cannot control what others think or how they judge us, we do have power over the assumptions we make regarding their judgments. He says that even if someone harbors negative thoughts about you, unless they vocalize these thoughts, they have no real impact on your life. Hence, it is unnecessary to be overly worried about others' silent judgments.
Skepi also promotes the idea that one should not let the potential judgments of others dictate personal freedom or self-perception. He suggests taking command of the narrative we tell ourselves, thereby reshaping the fear of being judged. By flipping the script and choosing to assume others may see us in a positive light, we can empower ourselves and mitigate the effects ...
Strategies for reframing your perspective on others' judgments
Leo Skepi details the importance of embracing the coexistence of contrasting judgments and perceptions to achieve a fuller understanding of oneself and others, leading to personal freedom to just be.
Skepi emphasizes the need to recognize that everyone is subject to both positive and negative judgments. This balance reflects the complexity of perception and helps combat the fear of judgment, moving away from a black-and-white worldview. People often judge based on perceived similarities or differences, and Skepi stresses that being different does not equate to being bad. Acknowledging this allows for a nonjudgmental approach toward individual identities, whether it's someone's hair color, clothing preference, or any other aspect of self-expression.
Skepi uses personal examples to illustrate the importance of embracing duality. They discuss being both Albanian and gay, which is seen as a disappointment in the Albanian community, but also defying the promiscuous stereotype often associated with gay people by choosing not to engage in such behavior. By allowing for contradictions and recognizing the multiplicity of people's identities, Skepi advocates for a more authentic perception of individuals beyond stereotypes. He acknowledges receiving both admiration and criticism for his tattoos but chooses to embrace these diverse judgments without letting them define who he is.
Skepi confronts the complications of self-expression, such as criticism about his hairline, which others fail to understand stems from personal stress and medical issues. This underscores the need to acknowledge the nuances of each person's situation. Skepi encourages not reducing someone to a single characteristic and understanding each individual as a complex entity.
He points out that even seemingly "cringe" influencers may receive love and support from th ...
Embracing contradictions and dualities in how you and others are perceived
Download the Shortform Chrome extension for your browser