Podcasts > Aware & Aggravated > Red Flags In Relationships & Talking Stages (Episode 110)

Red Flags In Relationships & Talking Stages (Episode 110)

By Leo Skepi

Dive into the intricacies of modern coupling with Leo Skepi in the latest installation of "Aware & Aggravated," where common red flags in blossoming and established relationships take center stage. Skepi's keen observations disentangle the subtle cues hidden in our digital habits, such as the orientation of our phones and our reactions to incoming messages. He urges listeners to be vigilant about actions that may seem innocuous but could hint at deeper issues of secrecy and the desire for control. These small but telling behaviors, including how one refers to past relationships and interacts on social media, can uncover a person's struggle with accountability and their hunger for validation.

In a world where commitment is often ambiguous, Skepi explores how the absence of future planning can highlight disparities in relationship readiness. He prods listeners to recognize when affection becomes a bargaining chip and how it reflects larger problems of effort recognition and appreciation balance in the relationship. Skepi doesn't shy away from the uncomfortable, pointing out that neglect for a partner's safety and defensiveness about one's history are not just cautionary signs—they're flaming beacons urging a closer look at the individual's character and intention. "Aware & Aggravated" continues to be not just an enrichment for one's emotional intelligence, but an essential guide in the quest for healthier, more transparent relationships.

Listen to the original

Red Flags In Relationships & Talking Stages (Episode 110)

This is a preview of the Shortform summary of the Jan 7, 2024 episode of the Aware & Aggravated

Sign up for Shortform to access the whole episode summary along with additional materials like counterarguments and context.

Red Flags In Relationships & Talking Stages (Episode 110)

1-Page Summary

Communication Dynamics

The host observes behaviors with phones that could be red flags in relationships. Keeping a phone face down might indicate secrecy, and having it on "Do Not Disturb" could show a desire to control communications, possibly to hide them. An anxious response to someone looking at their phone, such as quickly switching apps, suggests they may be hiding something. Additionally, if a person labels all their exes as "crazy," it often reveals their own accountability issues and implies a pattern that could persist. Publicly flirting in comments demonstrates a need for superficial attention and a lack of discretion, hinting at a desire for public validation.

Commitment Readiness Differences

Leo Skepi mentions that not making definite plans to meet again after hanging out spotlights uncertainty in commitment readiness. The absence of future plans indicates a lack of commitment, and a clarified conversation is necessary to address this insecurity. On the other hand, pulling back affection can hint at feeling underappreciated, pointing to an effort and appreciation imbalance. When affection is withheld, it's time to assess the relationship's dynamic and possibly end things if one feels undervalued.

Safety Considerations

Actions after social scenarios indicate character and intentions, according to Skepi. Not ensuring someone's safety, like waiting until they are inside their home, shows a serious lack of consideration for well-being. Additionally, if someone is defensive or evasive when discussing their past, it can be concerning. This behavior may suggest hiding something, and Skepi believes it's essential to probe further in such instances, emphasizing the importance of understanding someone's history to fully comprehend who they are.

1-Page Summary

Additional Materials

Clarifications

  • The text discusses various phone behaviors that could be red flags in relationships, such as keeping a phone face down indicating secrecy, having it on "Do Not Disturb" showing a desire to control communications, and quickly switching apps when someone looks at their phone suggesting they may be hiding something. Additionally, labeling all exes as "crazy" may reveal accountability issues, and publicly flirting in comments could indicate a need for superficial attention and a lack of discretion.
  • Labeling exes as "crazy" can indicate a lack of accountability and a tendency to shift blame onto others. It may suggest a pattern of not taking responsibility for one's actions in past relationships. This labeling can also reflect a dismissive attitude towards former partners and may signal unresolved issues that could impact future relationships.
  • Actions after social scenarios can provide insights into a person's character and intentions. For example, how someone ensures the safety of others or how they handle discussions about their past can reveal important aspects of their personality. These actions can indicate levels of consideration, honesty, and transparency, which are crucial in understanding someone's true nature and motivations. By observing how individuals behave after social interactions, we can gain a deeper understanding of their values and how they approach relationships.
  • Understanding someone's history is crucial as it provides insights into their past experiences, traumas, and influences that shape their present behaviors and attitudes. By delving into their past, you can uncover patterns, triggers, and motivations that may not be immediately apparent in their current actions. This knowledge can help you empathize, communicate effectively, and build a stronger connection with the person based on a deeper understanding of their background.

Counterarguments

  • Keeping the phone face down might be a habit or preference for privacy rather than an indication of secrecy.
  • Having a phone on "Do Not Disturb" could be a way to focus on the present company or task, not necessarily to control or hide communications.
  • Anxious behavior when someone looks at their phone could stem from a general discomfort with privacy invasion rather than hiding something specific.
  • Labeling exes as "crazy" might reflect poor communication skills or a pattern of being attracted to tumultuous relationships, rather than a lack of accountability.
  • Publicly flirting in comments could be a part of someone's open and extroverted personality rather than a need for superficial attention or lack of discretion.
  • Not making definite plans after hanging out could be due to a variety of reasons, such as a busy schedule or a preference for spontaneity, rather than uncertainty in commitment readiness.
  • Withholding affection might be a response to unresolved issues within the relationship or personal stress, rather than a sign of feeling underappreciated.
  • Actions after social scenarios can be influenced by cultural norms or personal beliefs about autonomy and independence, rather than a direct reflection of character and intentions.
  • Being defensive or evasive about past experiences might be a way to protect oneself from being judged or hurt, rather than an indication of hiding something.

Get access to the context and additional materials

So you can understand the full picture and form your own opinion.
Get access for free
Red Flags In Relationships & Talking Stages (Episode 110)

Communication Dynamics

Observations are made on certain behaviors as potential warning signs in relationships and social interactions.

Phone Behavior Red Flags

The host points out some behaviors associated with phones that could be considered red flags in a relationship.

Constantly laying phone face down

If someone constantly lays their phone face down, the host suggests this might be an indicator that the person has something they want to keep hidden.

Always having phone on Do Not Disturb

Furthermore, they consider consistently having a phone on "Do Not Disturb" as another potential red flag, as it could signify a desire to control who contacts when, possibly hiding certain interactions.

Reacting anxiously when you look at their phone

The host also emphasizes that anxious reactions to someone else glancing at their phone—such as quickly switching apps or putting their phone away—might signal that they are attempting to hide something.

Claiming All Exes Are "Crazy"

The host discusses the implications of someone describing all their previous partners as "crazy."

Reveals inability to take accountability

They interpret this behavior as revealing an individual’s inability to take accountability for their actions in past relationships.

You'll soon find out why the exes went "crazy"

The host warns that a pattern of calling ex-partners crazy often means there’s an underlying reason that caused the exes' b ...

Here’s what you’ll find in our full summary

Registered users get access to the Full Podcast Summary and Additional Materials. It’s easy and free!
Start your free trial today

Communication Dynamics

Additional Materials

Clarifications

  • Direct messages, often abbreviated as DMs or PMs, are private communications sent between users on various platforms, allowing for discreet one-on-one or group conversations. They are not visible to the general public and are intended for more personal or confidential interactions. Direct messages can be found on social media platforms like Twitter, Facebook, and Instagram, as well as on messaging app ...

Counterarguments

  • Constantly laying a phone face down could be a habit or a way to protect the screen from scratches, rather than an indication of hiding something.
  • Having a phone on Do Not Disturb may be a method for managing distractions and maintaining focus, especially in work or study environments, rather than controlling interactions or hiding them.
  • Anxious reactions to someone looking at their phone could stem from a desire for privacy or past experiences where their privacy was not respected, rather than an attempt to hide wrongdoing.
  • Describing all exes as "crazy" might be an oversimplification or a poor choice of words, and not necessarily a reflection of an inability to take accountability.
  • The pattern of calling ex-partners crazy could be coincidental or stem from being drawn to tumultuous relationships, rather than being the cause of the ...

Get access to the context and additional materials

So you can understand the full picture and form your own opinion.
Get access for free
Red Flags In Relationships & Talking Stages (Episode 110)

Commitment Readiness Differences

Leo Skepi delves into the nuances of commitment readiness, highlighting situations that might reveal one's intentions and readiness in a relationship.

Not Making Definite Plans to See You Again

According to Skepi, not having an agreed-upon plan to see each other again after hanging out is a red flag, revealing uncertainty about the relationship and potentially about the person’s commitment readiness. Wanting to hang out consistently and having certainty about the next meeting should be the norm, he argues. By not making an effort to plan future interactions, the other person may be indicating odd or unreliable behavior.

Need to clarify intentions

Skepi encourages feeling secure enough to ask about the next meeting, emphasizing that this need not be seen as unreasonable. Uncertainty can lead to insecurity, he notes, hence the importance of having a conversation to understand the reasons behind the other person's reluctance to make plans.

He also cautions against entertaining mixed messages, such as someone who asserts a desire to take things slow but still integrates you into significant aspects of their life. This overt involvement can be confusing and might necessitate a step back to match their initial claim of wanting to proceed slowly to avoid mental confusion and emotional hurt.

Pulling Back Affection Due to Feeling Underappreciated

Feeling unappreciated is often a sign of imbalance in effort and appreciation in a relationship, Skepi points out.

Reveals imbalance in effort/appreciation

When one partner starts to pull back affection, it typically signifies that they feel a lack of recipr ...

Here’s what you’ll find in our full summary

Registered users get access to the Full Podcast Summary and Additional Materials. It’s easy and free!
Start your free trial today

Commitment Readiness Differences

Additional Materials

Clarifications

  • To address uncertainty and insecurity in a relationship, it's crucial to communicate openly and honestly with your partner about your feelings and concerns. Establishing clear expectations and boundaries can help create a sense of security and understanding between both individuals. Taking the time to listen actively to each other's perspectives and working together to find solutions can strengthen the bond and alleviate uncertainties. Seeking support from a therapist or counselor can also provide valuable insights and tools to navigate relationship challenges effectively.
  • Navigating mixed messages in a relationship involves understanding and addressing conflicting signals or behaviors from a partner. It requires open communication to clarify intentions and expectations. It's essential to pay attention to actions rather than just words to decipher true feelings. Setting boundaries and discussing concerns can help resolve confusion and maintain a healthy relationship dynamic.
  • When one partner starts to pull back affection in a relationship, it often indicates a perceived lack of reciprocation or appreciation. This withdrawal of affection can be a response to feeling unappreciated or undervalued in the relationship dynamic. It serves as a signal that there may be an imbalance in effort and appreciation between partners. This behavior can prompt a need for reevaluation an ...

Counterarguments

  • Not making definite plans does not necessarily indicate a lack of commitment; individuals may have different communication styles or life circumstances that affect their planning habits.
  • Consistency in wanting to hang out can vary between individuals, and some may prefer spontaneity or have commitments that prevent regular scheduling.
  • Asking about the next meeting can sometimes put undue pressure on the relationship, especially in early stages where both parties are still assessing their feelings and compatibility.
  • Mixed messages may sometimes be a result of personal confusion or external pressures rather than a deliberate intention to mislead or confuse.
  • Pulling back affection could be a form of self-protection or a way to communicate dissatisfaction, not just a response to feeling underappreciated.
  • Reevaluating the relationship's dynamic is important, but it may be more constructive to address issues directly rather than withdrawing affection as a first response.
  • Ending a relationship solely because of feeling underappreciated might be premature without first attempting to communicate and resolve th ...

Get access to the context and additional materials

So you can understand the full picture and form your own opinion.
Get access for free
Red Flags In Relationships & Talking Stages (Episode 110)

Safety Considerations

Skepi emphasizes the relationship between action or the lack thereof after certain social scenarios and what these actions may signify about a person's character and intentions.

Not Waiting Until You're Safely Inside

Skepi is alarmed by people who don't ensure others have safely entered their house or observe to make certain they have driven off safely. He suggests this represents a significant lack of consideration for someone else's safety and well-being. If someone truly cares, he posits, they would make sure to wait until the other person is safe during such moments.

Further, Skepi signals that not waiting to confirm someone is safely inside after a drop-off is a glaring red flag, illustrating a disregard for their safety. He underscores the importance of basic consideration for another's well-being, marking it as a critical point in evaluating someone's nature.

Poor Response to Questions About Past

Skepi highlights defensiveness or evasion when discussing the past as concerning behaviors. He notes that if a person tells you it's none of your business when inquired about their past relationships or encounters, it should raise an alert. Understanding someone's history, ...

Here’s what you’ll find in our full summary

Registered users get access to the Full Podcast Summary and Additional Materials. It’s easy and free!
Start your free trial today

Safety Considerations

Additional Materials

Clarifications

  • The social scenarios mentioned in the text involve situations where individuals interact with others in ways that reflect their consideration for the safety and well-being of those around them. These scenarios include waiting to ensure someone has safely entered their house or driven off after a drop-off, as well as how individuals respond when asked about their past experiences and relationships. The text emphasizes the importance of these actions as indicators of a person's character and intentions.
  • Ensuring others' safety by waiting for them to enter their house or drive off signifies care and consideration for their well-being. It shows respect and attentiveness towards the safety of those around you. Failing to wait may be seen as a lack of empathy and regard for the safety of others. Waiting to confirm someone's safety after a drop-off is a way to show basic consideration and responsibility for their well-being.
  • Understanding a person's behavior in social scenarios can provide insights into their character and intentions. How individuals act or react in various situations can reveal underlying traits like empathy, consideration, honesty, or transparency. Observing behaviors like waiting to ensure someone's safety or how they respond to questions about their past can offer clues about their values, priorities, and how they engage with others. These behaviors can serve as indicators of a person's attitudes, beliefs, and the importance they place on factors like safety, respect, and openness in their interactions.
  • When someone is defensive or evasive when discussing their past, it can indicate they are hiding something or are uncomfortable with certain aspects of their history. This behavior may suggest ...

Counterarguments

  • Not everyone may be aware of the expectation to wait until someone is safely inside, and this lack of action may not necessarily reflect a lack of care or consideration.
  • Cultural differences can influence social expectations, such as waiting for someone to enter their home safely, and what is considered a red flag in one culture may not be perceived the same way in another.
  • People have different comfort levels with sharing personal history, and a desire for privacy does not inherently mean someone is untrustworthy or has something to hide.
  • Past experiences can be traumatic, and an individual's defensiveness or reluctance to discuss them may be a protective response rather than an indication of poor character.
  • The context of a relationship and the relevance of past information should be considered; not all details of one's past are pertinent to ev ...

Get access to the context and additional materials

So you can understand the full picture and form your own opinion.
Get access for free

Create Summaries for anything on the web

Download the Shortform Chrome extension for your browser

Shortform Extension CTA