The women's suffrage movement faced internal divisions over tactics, as dramatized in this episode of American History Tellers. Activist Alice Paul sought to pressure the Wilson administration through bold protests inspired by British tactics, such as the 1913 parade marred by violent opposition. This confrontational approach contrasted with veteran leaders' incremental strategy of state campaigns and relationship-building with politicians.
As the movement splintered, Paul formed new organizations focused on securing a federal amendment through lobbying, picketing, and targeting Democratic politicians. Meanwhile, Carrie Chapman Catt employed strategic lobbying at NAWSA, cooperating with Wilson's war efforts to gain his amendment support. The episode examines the dual paths to the eventual passage of the 19th Amendment.
Sign up for Shortform to access the whole episode summary along with additional materials like counterarguments and context.
Alice Paul, inspired by British suffrage protests, orchestrated a daring parade on the day of President Wilson's 1913 inauguration. Paul meticulously planned the march to capture attention and influence Wilson and the Democratic Congress to support a federal suffrage amendment.
Despite its bold symbolism, the parade erupted in chaos, as Paul narrates, as opponents physically obstructed and assaulted the marchers while police failed to protect them. Over 100 women were hospitalized.
In organizing the parade, Paul navigated logistical challenges like permits. However, the issue of Black suffragist participation revealed deeper racial tensions within the movement. Paul reluctantly agreed to segregate Black marchers, reflecting the discrimination they faced.
While veteran suffragists like Carrie Chapman Catt favored a state-by-state approach, the younger Paul adopted confrontational tactics inspired by Britain. As Paul narrated, her methods like sidewalk chalk protests raised concerns among some suffragists about alienating allies.
Paul's Congressional Union and later the National Woman's Party further divided the movement. Catt aimed to rein Paul in under the mainstream NAWSA, but Paul refused Catt's bid for unity, deepening an irrevocable schism over tactics.
Emboldened by her parade's publicity, Paul refocused efforts on securing a federal suffrage amendment through Congress and state ratification, pursuing an approach she believed more achievable than state-by-state campaigns.
Paul's Congressional Union took disruptive actions like continuously picketing Wilson's White House. They strategically pressured Democratic politicians through critical publicity to support what Paul called the "Susan B. Anthony Amendment."
In contrast, Catt's NAWSA used strategic relationship-building tactics like the "Front Door Lobby" to lobby congressmembers respectfully. Catt allied NAWSA with Wilson's war efforts to gain his amendment support while intensifying lobbying and publicity campaigns.
1-Page Summary
On the afternoon of March 3rd, 1913, thousands of women paraded down Pennsylvania Avenue in Washington, D.C., to demand a federal suffrage amendment in a bid to capture President Woodrow Wilson's attention.
Alice Paul returned from England in 1910 with the drive to reenergize the American suffrage movement. Joining the National American Women's Suffrage Association, she spoke of suffrage and her time in English prisons. By the end of 1912, after western states had enfranchised women, Paul saw the opportunity to leverage suffrage's political force at a national level.
Aiming to influence the newly elected President Wilson and the Democratic majority in Congress, Paul orchestrated a grand march on Washington to coincide with Wilson's inauguration. Along with Lucy Burns, Paul planned the parade meticulously, organizing funding, obtaining permissions, and drumming up publicity. Inez Millholland, riding at the front, served as a striking symbol of the suffrage demand.
Unfortunately, the march was met with obstruction and backlash. As the women proceeded down the avenue, young men leaped over barriers and obstructed their path, with some accosting the participants, verbally assaulting them, and tearing at their sashes. The narration portrays the increased sense of danger as police failed to protect the marchers—some of whom were subjected to physical assault, ultimately resulting in over 100 women being hospitalized.
Despite the chaos, the parade's violent interruption brought heightened visibility to the suffrage movement. Alice Paul utilized the incident to demand congressional investigations into police misconduct, further intensifying the suffrage cause's publicity.
In the lead-up to the parade, organizers had to navigate ...
1913 Women's Suffrage Parade and Organizing Protest Challenges
The suffrage movement's internal dynamics were detailed and complex, with significant tensions emerging between the midstream of movement politics and the aggressive, headline-grabbing approach of activists like Alice Paul.
Veteran suffragists within the movement, such as Anna Howard Shaw and Carrie Chapman Catt, preferred a cautious, state-by-state approach to gaining the right to vote. However, a younger generation of suffragists emerged, led by Alice Paul, who had been inspired by the more dramatic tactics of the British suffrage movement.
Alice Paul adopted these aggressive tactics to capture publicity and spur action, which led to a rift within the American movement between her confrontational approach and the more incremental strategy favored by leaders like Carrie Chapman Catt. This difference in methods suggested a deeper ideological split about how best to achieve their common goal.
While Shaw expressed initial gratitude for Paul's service, her aggressive methods, such as the arrest for chalking a sidewalk, became too militant for some suffragists’ tastes and pointed to simmering tensions. The criticism by Shaw and the concerns voiced by others about adopting "tankers' tactics" indicated a fear that Paul's actions could risk damaging the progress made in the fight for suffrage.
At the NAWSA's annual convention in December 1913, a conflict broke out between Paul and Catt, who criticized Paul's tactics and stressed the importance of a unified effort under one organization. Alice Paul's methods soon ignited controversy, leading to alienation and new divisions in the movement.
Alice Paul and Lucy Burns's creation of the Congressional Union, a semi-independent organization, alienated more cooperative suffragists like Shaw, who viewed Paul's tactics as dangerously militant and a divergence of funds from the movement. The vete ...
Tensions and Divisions in Suffrage Movement Tactics
Advocates like Alice Paul and Carrie Chapman Catt dedicated tremendous effort to campaigning for a federal suffrage amendment to ensure women could vote nationwide.
After the attention-grabbing 1913 parade, Alice Paul was determined to use the publicity from the march to revitalize her campaign for the amendment. Paul saw the march as an opportunity to build support for the movement and was determined to use the attention to breathe new life into her amendment campaign. She believed that a federal amendment was the only path to securing the vote for all women across the nation. The suffrage amendment had been introduced in 1878 but had languished for decades due to a focus on state campaigns. Paul viewed this state-by-state strategy as slow and problematic, seeing no chance of convincing male voters in all forty-eight states to support suffrage.
Paul believed that pushing for a constitutional amendment through Congress and getting it ratified was a formidable yet achievable task. She persuaded Anna Howard Shaw to let her take over the Congressional Committee, aiming to renew the fight for a federal amendment. With the first float in the parade making the demand for a federal suffrage amendment exceptionally clear, Paul aimed to leverage the parade's impact.
Alice Paul and her supporters staged continuous picketing at the White House, a novel and defiant act at the time. Known as the Silent Sentinels, they held silk banners with messages challenging President Wilson's inaction. Paul continued her controversial protests even as Wilson asked Congress to declare war on Germany, unlike Catt, who chose to support the war effort to gain the president's suffrage support. The Congressional Union aimed at influencing President Wilson and other government members by calling Wilson out for being an obstacle to federal suffrage on the cover of Paul's weekly newspaper, "The Suffragist."
Paul led a strategic campaign targeting Democrats in the 1914 midterm elections, naming the amendment under discussion in Congress the Susan B. Anthony Amendment. She asserted that she and the Congressional Union were continuing Anthony's legacy, rather than the National American Woman Suffrage Association (NAWSA). In 1916, the National Woman's Party worked to damage President Wilson's re-election campaign due to his refusal to support a federal amendment, encouraging women voters in the West to vote against the Democratic Party.
Unlike Alice Paul's confrontational tactics, Carrie Ch ...
Federal Suffrage Amendment Push and Support Efforts
Download the Shortform Chrome extension for your browser