Podcasts > American History Tellers > Encore: Presidential Assassinations | Murder for Spoils | 2

Encore: Presidential Assassinations | Murder for Spoils | 2

By Wondery

In this episode of American History Tellers, the tumultuous aftermath of President James Garfield's assassination is examined. Garfield's presidency was marked by a division within the Republican Party regarding the spoils system—the practice of awarding government jobs for political support. His efforts to curtail this corruption put him at odds with Stalwart leader Roscoe Conkling, ultimately leading to a critical blow against the spoils system.

Yet Garfield's death at the hands of a delusional assassin had even greater consequences. His prolonged, agonizing demise exposed the gross incompetence of his medical team and fueled public outcry for civil service reform. It was this outrage over Garfield's martyrdom that finally culminated in the Pendleton Civil Service Act, ending the spoils system and establishing merit-based hiring.

Encore: Presidential Assassinations | Murder for Spoils | 2

This is a preview of the Shortform summary of the Aug 14, 2024 episode of the American History Tellers

Sign up for Shortform to access the whole episode summary along with additional materials like counterarguments and context.

Encore: Presidential Assassinations | Murder for Spoils | 2

1-Page Summary

Garfield's presidency and the Republican party politics

The spoils system, awarding government jobs for political support, deeply divided the Republican Party in 1880: Stalwarts supported it, while Liberal Republicans pushed for civil service reform. As a compromise candidate agreeable to both factions, James Garfield, a Liberal Republican, was nominated for president.

Conflict with Stalwart leader Roscoe Conkling over appointments

Garfield challenged Stalwart Conkling's power by nominating a reform-minded collector for the lucrative New York Customs House position. Conkling's protest resignation from the Senate backfired, failing to get him re-elected, marking a victory for Garfield and a blow against the spoils system.

The assassination attempt and its aftermath

Delusional Charles Guiteau believed he deserved a diplomatic appointment for supporting Garfield's campaign. When denied, Guiteau stalked and shot Garfield, wounding but not immediately killing him.

Garfield's slow, painful death

Despite initial optimism, doctors' inability to locate the bullet and their unhygienic care led to fatal infections. Garfield endured agony for 79 days before succumbing, outraging the public and highlighting calls for civil service reform.

The medical failures and push for reform

Garfield's lead physician, Dr. Bliss, repeatedly misdiagnosed Garfield by insisting the bullet was on the wrong side. The autopsy revealed Bliss's fatal error, spurring anger over his incompetence and role of the spoils system in Garfield's death.

President Arthur, a former spoils beneficiary, recognized the need for reform. In 1883, he signed the Pendleton Civil Service Act, ending the spoils system by requiring merit-based hiring -- a victory reformers credited to Garfield's martyrdom.

1-Page Summary

Additional Materials

Clarifications

  • Stalwarts were a faction within the Republican Party who supported the spoils system, which rewarded political loyalty with government jobs. Liberal Republicans, on the other hand, advocated for civil service reform, aiming to end the spoils system and promote merit-based hiring in government positions. James Garfield, a compromise candidate, was a Liberal Republican who sought to bridge the divide between these two factions within the party.
  • The New York Customs House was a key federal office responsible for collecting tariffs on imported goods entering the United States. It was a highly sought-after position due to its significant influence and financial rewards. The appointment to this position was often used as a political tool to reward supporters, leading to intense competition and conflicts within political parties. In the context of Garfield's presidency, the nomination of a reform-minded collector to this position was a pivotal moment that highlighted the struggle between different factions within the Republican Party and the broader debate over civil service reform.
  • Charles Guiteau was a mentally unstable individual who believed he played a crucial role in getting James Garfield elected as president. Guiteau thought he deserved a diplomatic post as a reward for his perceived contribution to Garfield's victory. When his demands were not met, he became fixated on the idea that removing Garfield from office would benefit the country, leading to his assassination attempt. Guiteau's delusions and motivations were driven by a distorted sense of self-importance and a misguided belief in his own significance in the political landscape.
  • Dr. Bliss misdiagnosed President Garfield's condition by incorrectly locating the bullet inside his body. This error led to ineffective treatment and ultimately fatal infections. The autopsy revealed the mistake, highlighting the consequences of Bliss's incompetence in Garfield's care. Bliss's failure to properly care for the President contributed to the public outrage and calls for reform in the medical field.
  • President Arthur's background as a spoils beneficiary means that he had previously benefited from the spoils system, where political supporters were rewarded with government positions. This system allowed individuals like Arthur to secure government jobs based on their political loyalty rather than qualifications. Arthur's experience as a beneficiary of this system influenced his perspective on civil service reform during his presidency. His role in signing the Pendleton Civil Service Act marked a significant shift away from the spoils system towards merit-based hiring in government positions.
  • The Pendleton Civil Service Act, signed in 1883, established a merit-based system for federal employment, requiring candidates to take competitive exams for government positions. This act aimed to reduce corruption and patronage in government hiring, moving away from the spoils system where jobs were given based on political loyalty. The Act created the United States Civil Service Commission to oversee the implementation of the new system, marking a significant shift towards a more professional and efficient government workforce. President Arthur's support for this reform was influenced by the public outrage over Garfield's assassination and the failures of the spoils system.

Counterarguments

  • The spoils system was a common practice and not unique to the Republican Party; it was a widespread political mechanism used by both parties at different times in history.
  • Some historians argue that Garfield's nomination was less about being a compromise and more about the political maneuvering and dynamics of the 1880 Republican National Convention.
  • The assertion that Garfield's challenge to Conkling marked a clear victory might be oversimplified, as the political struggle between factions continued beyond this incident.
  • The role of Charles Guiteau's delusions in the assassination attempt could be seen as an oversimplification of his motives, which might also include broader political and personal grievances.
  • The medical practices of the time should be considered in the context of the era's limited medical knowledge; the criticism of Dr. Bliss might not fully account for the state of medical science in the late 19th century.
  • While President Arthur signed the Pendleton Civil Service Act, it's worth noting that the act was not an immediate end to the spoils system; patronage continued in various forms and the transition to a merit-based system was gradual.
  • The credit given to Garfield's martyrdom for the passage of the Pendleton Act could be debated, as the act was the result of a broader civil service reform movement that predated and outlasted Garfield's presidency.

Get access to the context and additional materials

So you can understand the full picture and form your own opinion.
Get access for free
Encore: Presidential Assassinations | Murder for Spoils | 2

Garfield's presidency and the Republican party politics

The deep divides within the Republican Party over the spoils system and the tension between factions set the stage for James Garfield's nomination and presidency.

The Republican Party was deeply divided over the spoils system, with conservatives supporting the status quo and liberals pushing for civil service reform.

The spoils system, which awarded government jobs to political supporters, was at the heart of the division within the Republican Party in the 1880 presidential election. Conservatives within the party, known as Stalwarts, steadfastly defended this traditional practice against a growing chorus of critics who argued the system bred corruption and incompetence in government roles. On the other side, Liberal Republicans called for a merit-based civil service system to replace the spoils system.

James Garfield, a liberal Republican, was nominated as a compromise candidate at the 1880 Republican National Convention after a contentious battle between the two factions.

At the Republican National Convention of 1880, the split between conservatives and liberals was glaringly evident. Neither Stalwart candidate Ulysses S. Grant nor Liberal candidate James Blaine could secure a majority of votes for the nomination. James Garfield, an Ohio Congressman and a liberal Republican who maintained cordial ties with the Stalwarts, became a compromise candidate. His ascent to nomination was a reluctant affair but was solidified after thirty-six rounds of voting. To pacify the Stalwarts post-nomination, Garfield's vice-presidential running mate was Chester Arthur, a Stalwart ally of Senator Roscoe Conkling.

Garfield's conflict with powerful Stalwart leader Roscoe Conkling over the New York Customs House appointment highlighted the ongoing tension over the spoils system.

Garfield's nomination of a reform-minded collector to the lucrative position infuriated Conkling, who saw it as an attack on his power.

The Garfield administration sparked controversy when the president nominated William Robertson, a judge known for his reformist views, for the collector of the New York Customs House. This nomination was a deliberate challenge to Roscoe Conkling's longstanding dominance over patronage appointments in New York, partic ...

Here’s what you’ll find in our full summary

Registered users get access to the Full Podcast Summary and Additional Materials. It’s easy and free!
Start your free trial today

Garfield's presidency and the Republican party politics

Additional Materials

Counterarguments

  • The spoils system, while criticized for corruption, could be defended as a means of ensuring loyalty and cohesive governance, as political appointees would be aligned with the administration's goals.
  • Garfield's nomination as a compromise candidate might be viewed not just as a unifying choice but also as a strategic move by the party to present a candidate who could appeal to a broader electorate.
  • The conflict with Roscoe Conkling could be seen as a power struggle within the party, with Garfield's actions interpreted as an attempt to consolidate his own power rather than purely a principled stand for reform.
  • The nomination of a reform-minded collector, while lauded as a move against corruption, might have had unintended consequences, such as disrupting esta ...

Actionables

  • You can analyze current political divisions by creating a simple chart to track differing viewpoints within a party or organization. Start by listing key issues on one side and the various factions or individuals on the other, noting where they stand on each issue. This visual representation can help you understand the dynamics at play and predict potential compromises or conflicts.
  • Enhance your conflict resolution skills by role-playing historical scenarios with friends or colleagues. Take the role of a figure like Garfield or Conkling and attempt to navigate a contentious situation. This exercise can improve your negotiation tactics and ability to find common ground in your personal or professional life.
  • Practice critical decision-making by setting up ...

Get access to the context and additional materials

So you can understand the full picture and form your own opinion.
Get access for free
Encore: Presidential Assassinations | Murder for Spoils | 2

The assassination attempt and its aftermath

Charles Guiteau, a delusional and unstable man, believed he deserved a diplomatic appointment for helping Garfield's campaign and hatched a plan to assassinate the president.

Guiteau stalked Garfield relentlessly and shot him at a train station in Washington, D.C. on July 2, 1881.

Charles Guiteau, consumed by an obsession with politics and the spoils system, fixated on the idea of being appointed as a U.S. ambassador to France after convincing himself that his speech had secured President James Garfield’s election victory. Despite his persistent harassment of the Secretary of State for an appointment and being clearly told he had no prospects, Guiteau escalated his delusion to planning the assassination of President Garfield. Guiteau prepared by practicing with a gun, stalking Garfield, and gathering letters that explained his motive for assassination as a political necessity.

On the morning of July 2, 1881, as President Garfield headed to the Baltimore and Potomac train station in Washington D.C. with his two sons and Secretary Blaine, Guiteau struck. Secretary of War Robert Todd Lincoln was also present to see the President off. Guiteau stepped forward in the station waiting room and fired at the President, after having hesitated the previous night. His first shot grazed Garfield's arm, but the second bullet struck Garfield in the back. Garfield was carried upstairs as Dr. Willard Bliss was called to the scene, beginning a long and painful ordeal for the wounded President.

Garfield survived the initial gunshot wound, but the lack of proper medical care and the doctors' inability to locate the bullet led to a painful, drawn-out death.

Despite being shot, Garfield was not immediately written off as dying. Dr. Willard Bliss, who had previously tended to Abraham Lincoln, undertook Garfield's medical care. Garfield endured constant excruciating pain, vomiting from inappropriate diet choices given his condition, and infection set in due to unhygienic medical interventions. Alexander Graham Bell attempted to locate the bullet using an induction balance, to no avail. Ultimately, infections and septicemia proved impossible to control. The President grew sicker during the late summer of 1881, expressing his desire to see the ocean before his growing weak. Garfield cried out in pain on the night of September 19th ...

Here’s what you’ll find in our full summary

Registered users get access to the Full Podcast Summary and Additional Materials. It’s easy and free!
Start your free trial today

The assassination attempt and its aftermath

Additional Materials

Actionables

  • You can explore the impact of historical events on modern policies by researching a significant event and identifying its long-term effects on current laws or social norms. For instance, delve into the history of a major policy reform that interests you, such as the civil rights movement, and trace its influence on today's legislation and societal attitudes, drawing parallels to the civil service reforms post-Garfield's assassination.
  • Enhance your understanding of the consequences of inadequate healthcare by volunteering at a local health advocacy group. Through this, you'll gain firsthand insight into the challenges faced by patients and the importance of medical advancements, mirroring the tragic outcome of President Garfield's treatment.
  • Cultivate empathy and historical awareness by writing a f ...

Get access to the context and additional materials

So you can understand the full picture and form your own opinion.
Get access for free
Encore: Presidential Assassinations | Murder for Spoils | 2

The medical failures in treating Garfield and the push for civil service reform

The treatment of President Garfield after his shooting and his eventual death led to significant changes in the medical establishment and spurred on civil service reform.

Dr. Bliss, the lead physician, repeatedly misdiagnosed Garfield's condition and refused to allow other doctors to assist, leading to disastrous consequences.

Dr. Willard Bliss's treatment of President Garfield was characterized by a series of medical errors and egotistical decisions. Known for disregarding European medical theories on sterilization, Bliss tried to control all aspects of Garfield's care and ousted his competitors, even blocking the President's personal physician, Dr. Jedediah Hyde Baxter, from seeing him. Bliss established himself firmly as the singular voice for the President's treatment, isolating Garfield and mismanaging his medical care with an array of unsterilized interventions and ineffective treatments.

Bliss's insistence on using unsterile procedures and his failure to locate the bullet contributed to Garfield's drawn-out and ultimately fatal illness.

Bliss's approach to treating Garfield involved unsterilized probing and a firm, mistaken belief that the bullet had lodged near the liver, on the right side of the President's body. As he continued to provide public updates, the medical interventions administered by Bliss and his team persisted without locating the bullet and successfully addressing the President's infection.

The autopsy revealed that Garfield's doctors had been mistaken about the location of the bullet, further undermining public confidence in the medical establishment.

The shocking discovery during Garfield's autopsy was that the fatal bullet lay behind his pancreas on the left side, contrary to Bliss's insistence. The autopsy revealed severe septic poisoning and abscesses, indicating the President had suffered extensive infections, and the ultimate cause of death being a ruptured splenic artery caused by infection-induced complications.

This revelation, along with the growing outcry over Garfield's death, helped build momentum for civil service reform.

Garfield's death, which many saw as a result of medical malpractice rather than the bullet itself, amplified the calls for civil service reform. The outcry ...

Here’s what you’ll find in our full summary

Registered users get access to the Full Podcast Summary and Additional Materials. It’s easy and free!
Start your free trial today

The medical failures in treating Garfield and the push for civil service reform

Additional Materials

Clarifications

  • President James A. Garfield was shot by Charles J. Guiteau on July 2, 1881, at a train station in Washington, D.C. The shooting was a result of Guiteau's delusional belief that he was owed a government position. Garfield's assassination led to a prolonged and painful death over the course of 80 days, during which the medical treatment he received was marred by errors and mismanagement.
  • The patronage system, also known as the spoils system, was a practice where political parties rewarded their supporters with government positions, regardless of qualifications. This system led to corruption, inefficiency, and the appointment of unqualified individuals to important government roles. The Pendleton Civil Service Act of 1883 aimed to reform this system by requiring government positions to be filled based on merit and qualifications rather than political connections. This act marked a significant shift towards a more professional and efficient civil service in the United States.
  • Civil service reform in the 19th century United States aimed to replace the patronage system with a merit-based system for gove ...

Counterarguments

  • Dr. Bliss's actions could be viewed in the context of the medical knowledge and standards of his time, which did not fully understand antisepsis and the importance of sterile procedures.
  • The medical community of the era was divided on many practices, and Bliss may have been following a school of thought that was common among some practitioners.
  • The push for civil service reform had begun before Garfield's assassination, and while his death may have accelerated the process, it was not the sole cause of the reform.
  • Chester Arthur's support for the Pendleton Act could be seen as politically expedient rather than a complete p ...

Get access to the context and additional materials

So you can understand the full picture and form your own opinion.
Get access for free

Create Summaries for anything on the web

Download the Shortform Chrome extension for your browser

Shortform Extension CTA