In this episode of American History Tellers, Carol Leonnig explores the evolution of the Secret Service, from its origins as a unit combating counterfeiting to its current role as the president's protectors. She details how major incidents like the Kennedy assassination prompted sweeping reforms, while recent scandals exposed vulnerabilities that persist today.
Despite measures like increased training and diversity initiatives, Leonnig reveals that the agency continues to face significant challenges. Resource constraints, staffing issues, and a damaged public image remain obstacles in fulfilling the Service's critical mission. The episode sheds light on the complexities surrounding presidential security and examines the steps—and missteps—taken by this storied agency.
Sign up for Shortform to access the whole episode summary along with additional materials like counterarguments and context.
Carol Leonnig explains that the Secret Service, now synonymous with presidential protection, was originally created in 1865 to combat widespread counterfeiting of U.S. currency. Despite facing multiple presidential assassinations, the agency only gradually took on the responsibility of protecting the president over time, as the philosophy around security evolved.
The assassination of President Kennedy was a watershed moment that led to major reforms within the Secret Service. Director James Rowley doubled the president's protection detail, developed intelligence analysis capabilities, and instituted rigorous training after the agency faced criticism for failing to prevent Kennedy's death.
While agents like Jerry Parr showcased the agency's improvements during the 1981 Reagan assassination attempt, Leonnig notes that security gaps like insufficient cover and vetting also remained evident.
The 2014 White House fence jumper incident and the 2012 Cartagena scandal involving agents soliciting prostitutes exposed vulnerabilities and a concerning "boys' club" culture within the Secret Service.
While efforts like increasing diversity were made to address issues like discrimination revealed by a 1990s lawsuit, Leonnig suggests progress has been uneven due to lack of resources and resistance to change.
According to Leonnig, the Secret Service faces existential challenges due to strained resources and staffing issues, struggling to adequately cover protectees and events. A recent security breach at a Trump rally highlighted these operational constraints.
Restoring public trust also remains an obstacle, as the agency's credibility has been significantly damaged by past scandals and failures. Leonnig cites the controversial handling of the 2020 Trump security breach by Director Cheadle as an example of persisting internal conflicts over acknowledging problems.
1-Page Summary
The Secret Service, now synonymous with presidential protection, was originally conceived for a very different purpose.
The Secret Service was established on the very same day President Abraham Lincoln was assassinated, April 14, 1865. However, the agency's initial mission was not to protect the president but to address the rampant problem of counterfeit currency. At that time, Lincoln and his secretary of the treasury were deeply concerned about the volume of counterfeit notes, with a staggering estimation that two-thirds of the currency in circulation were forgeries created by extensive counterfeit gangs.
Despite facing multiple presidential assassinations, the notion of a formal security detail for the president was long resisted by the White House. The resistance stemmed from a belief that heavy security was incompatible with the important democratic ideal of maintaining a president's accessibility. The idea of a ...
The Secret Service's Origins and Early Mission
In the wake of tragic events, the Secret Service faced scrutiny and ultimately underwent substantial changes to enhance the protection of U.S. presidents.
In 1964, Secret Service director James Rowley sat before the Warren Commission, seeking help and defending the Secret Service against criticisms that his agents had failed to protect President Kennedy. Described by Carol Leonnig as a traumatic event for the agency, the assassination led to deep pain among the agents, some of whom turned to alcohol and even suicide. Despite previously pleading for more resources and being turned down, Rowley had to argue that the assassination was not due to his agents' fault but due to inevitable deficiencies caused by poor resources and shrinking budgets. Concerns were raised about agents' preparedness, and fitness for duty, particularly regarding some agents who had been drinking the night before Kennedy's death.
Leonnig recounts that there were tragic mistakes on the day of Kennedy’s assassination, such as the lack of methods for assessing the likelihood of an attack from a high-rise building. The Secret Service faced questions about whether the agents' late-night drinking had affected their alertness during the assassination.
After Kennedy's death, Secret Service underwent significant rebuilding with the aid of lawmakers. Hundreds of new agents were hired, a modern computer system was developed for gathering and assessing threat intelligence, and new training routines including an "Attack on the Principal" program were established.
Attempts to assassinate Presidents Gerald Ford and Ronald Reagan indicated the improvements in the Secret Service, yet also showed remaining security gaps.
The Transition to Presidential Protection and the Agency's Response to Assassinations
The Secret Service has grappled with security breaches and internal scandals necessitating a series of reforms and improvements in their protocols and culture.
High-profile incidents have laid bare the Secret Service's vulnerabilities and have acted as catalysts for change within the agency.
A significant breach occurred when a disabled Iraq veteran with psychological issues jumped the White House fence. While President Obama and his daughters had just left for Camp David, the intruder made it onto the property, passing by 100 different personnel, before eventually entering the mansion. An alarm that should have been tripped remained silent, a canine unit was not released due to operational distractions, and officers expected the unsubdued canine unit to engage, causing delays. The usual security measures were also compromised when an officer failed to lock the doors in time due to alarms being turned down at the White House staff's request.
The Cartagena scandal of 2012 brought to light a “boys' club” culture within the Secret Service when agents in Colombia were sent home for engaging in drunken partying and hiring prostitutes just before President Obama’s arrival. Carol Leonnig's investigation into the incident revealed an uncomfortable truth: a subset of the Secret Service has often protected its own image by covering up misconduct and security failures instead of concretely addressing these issues. Furthermore, these foreign trips are sometimes seen by agents as opportunities to indulge in misconduct. This scandal and others have shown that there has long been a need for cultural change within the agency.
Despite numerous recommendations and review panels, the road to reform has been bumpy and fraught with resistance.
Key Incidents and the Secret Service's Reforms and Improvements Over Time
The Secret Service is currently facing significant challenges in resource allocation, with a recent security breach at a Trump rally bringing intense scrutiny to the agency’s operational effectiveness and leadership.
Carol Leonnig reports that the Secret Service is dealing with existential challenges in its ability to provide protection. She highlights the incident where a shooter was able to fire eight rounds at a Trump rally in Butler, Pennsylvania, while being dangerously close to the former president. This breach occurred despite the existence of tactical teams such as counter-snipers and counter-assault agents, indicating a severe strain due to reduced numbers through retirement and attrition.
The agency faces limitations on the number of people in core units responsible for high-stakes protection, making it difficult to secure candidates on the road efficiently during busy campaign seasons. There is a lack of sufficient counter-assault teams to cover concurrent events or protect multiple individuals when required.
The history of scandals, embarrassments, and high-profile security failures, coupled with a reluctance to openly acknowledge and address problems within the agency, has significantly eroded its credibility.
Leonnig reveals that sources within and retirees from the Secret Service were irate over Director Cheadle's response to the failed assassination attempt on Trump ...
Current Challenges and Controversies Facing the Agency
Download the Shortform Chrome extension for your browser