Podcasts > American History Tellers > World War I | "Heaven, Hell, or Hoboken" | 5

World War I | "Heaven, Hell, or Hoboken" | 5

By Wondery

In this American History Tellers episode, the United States' rapid transformation from military unpreparedness at the outset of World War I to becoming a global military power by the war's end is explored. The early debate around potential US involvement, overshadowed by Wilson's preference for neutrality, eventually gave way to the establishment of a draft and an expedited training process that churned out over a million new soldiers at 32 camps across the country.

The episode sheds light on the African American troop experience, recounting both the discrimination they faced and the perspective-altering interactions that fueled their civil rights movement upon returning home. It also spotlights key WWI battles like Meuse-Argonne, the valor of soldiers like the Lost Battalion, and the war's abrupt conclusion—serving as a prelude to America's continued rise on the global stage.

World War I | "Heaven, Hell, or Hoboken" | 5

This is a preview of the Shortform summary of the May 1, 2024 episode of the American History Tellers

Sign up for Shortform to access the whole episode summary along with additional materials like counterarguments and context.

World War I | "Heaven, Hell, or Hoboken" | 5

1-Page Summary

The Pre-WWI US Military

The U.S. military in 1914 was modest with around 125,000 troops, focused primarily on naval power. It valued a rapidly mobilizable force over a large standing army, reflecting the Minutemen tradition.

Domestic Politics Around US Entry Into WWI

As President Woodrow Wilson navigated pressures from interventionists like Theodore Roosevelt calling for US entry, and isolationists opposing involvement, he personally hoped for a negotiated peace to avoid military engagement, Author Bator reports.

However, Wilson signed the National Defense Act of 1916, expanding the military and giving the federal government power to mobilize the economy, anticipating potential US involvement.

Rapid Military Mobilization and Training

With the Selective Service Act of 1917 establishing a draft, the US underwent a profound shift in military mobilization, training over 1 million recruits in 32 camps across the country through an expedited process, often with inadequate equipment until deploying to Europe.

To foster community involvement, registration occurred locally, and recruits traveled by train to training camps, transitioning rapidly from civilians to soldiers.

African American Troop Experience

African American soldiers encountered segregation and discrimination within the US military, often relegated to labor roles. However, serving in Europe exposed them to more equitable treatment, as evident with the exploits of the Harlem Hellfighters, transforming their perspectives on civil rights upon return despite facing continued racism and violence.

Key WWI Battles for US Troops

At the Meuse-Argonne offensive in 1918, over 1 million American troops played a crucial role breaking through German defenses, overcoming immense challenges like the story of the "Lost Battalion" trapped under friendly fire, with carrier pigeons like Cher Ami proving vital for communication.

WWI's Sudden End and Legacy

Fighting abruptly ended on November 11, 1918, with American troops rapidly demobilized. While the massive American Expeditionary Force returned home, US military cemeteries in Europe stand as solemn reminders of their sacrifices, Author Baro notes.

The war necessitated rapid expansion and modernization of the US military, laying foundations for America's emergence as a global superpower in the 20th century, the author concludes.

1-Page Summary

Additional Materials

Clarifications

  • The Minutemen tradition in the context of the U.S. military reflects the historical practice of citizen-soldiers who were ready for rapid mobilization during times of need, particularly during the American Revolutionary War. These Minutemen were known for their ability to assemble quickly to respond to threats, emphasizing the importance of a swift and agile military force. This tradition influenced the early military strategies of the United States, prioritizing readiness and quick deployment over maintaining a large standing army.
  • The National Defense Act of 1916 was a U.S. federal law that expanded the military and National Guard, created reserve corps, and enhanced the President's authority to federalize the National Guard. It aimed to strengthen military preparedness amidst international tensions before the U.S. entered World War I. The Act also facilitated the development of an Aviation arm within the Army and ensured the availability of wartime resources through advanced contracts. The legislation was a response to the "preparedness controversy" and aimed to modernize and enhance the readiness of the U.S. military forces.
  • The Selective Service Act of 1917, also known as the Selective Draft Act, allowed the U.S. government to conscript soldiers for World War I. It was a response to the need for a larger military force as the U.S. entered the war. The Act was crucial in rapidly expanding the military through a draft system, ensuring a sufficient number of troops for the conflict. It played a significant role in shaping the composition and size of the American military during World War I.
  • The Meuse-Argonne offensive was a significant part of the final Allied push in World War I, involving a massive number of troops and lasting 47 days. It was the largest battle in U.S. military history, with a high casualty count, and played a crucial role in ending the war. The offensive was a key engagement for the American Expeditionary Forces and part of the broader Hundred Days Offensive that led to the war's conclusion.
  • The American Expeditionary Forces (AEF) were the U.S. military units deployed to Europe during World War I under the command of General John J. Pershing. They fought alongside Allied forces on the Western Front, playing significant roles in key battles like the Meuse-Argonne Offensive. The AEF's involvement marked a crucial turning point in the war and showcased America's emergence as a global power.

Counterarguments

  • The focus on naval power in the U.S. military in 1914 could be critiqued for not fully preparing the U.S. for the type of warfare seen in WWI, which was largely land-based and involved trench warfare.
  • The value placed on a rapidly mobilizable force over a large standing army might be criticized for leaving the U.S. unprepared for the prolonged and intensive demands of modern warfare that WWI represented.
  • While Wilson hoped for a negotiated peace, some historians argue that his policies and actions, such as the National Defense Act of 1916, may have indirectly escalated the path to war.
  • The National Defense Act of 1916 could be criticized for potentially overstepping in terms of federal power, particularly in its ability to mobilize the economy.
  • The expedited training processes resulting from the Selective Service Act of 1917 could be seen as inadequate, potentially compromising the effectiveness and safety of U.S. troops.
  • The treatment of African American soldiers could be critiqued not just for the discrimination they faced, but also for the missed opportunity to fully utilize their capabilities in combat roles.
  • The narrative of the Meuse-Argonne offensive might be challenged by emphasizing the contributions of allied forces and the complex nature of the offensive beyond the American involvement.
  • The assertion that WWI laid the foundations for America's emergence as a global superpower could be contested by arguing that other factors, such as WWII and the post-war economic boom, were more significant in establishing U.S. global dominance.
  • The idea that U.S. military cemeteries in Europe serve solely as solemn reminders of sacrifice might be countered by discussing how they also represent the complexities of American foreign policy and military intervention.

Get access to the context and additional materials

So you can understand the full picture and form your own opinion.
Get access for free
World War I | "Heaven, Hell, or Hoboken" | 5

The US military before WWI

In 1914, the U.S. military maintained a modest force of approximately 125,000 troops. Despite its small size, it possessed the capacity to effectively pursue and safeguard American national interests.

Military Focus and Minutemen Tradition

The emphasis of the U.S. military during this period was on naval power, as it prepared mainly for potential confrontations at sea rather than extensive land battles. This decision reflected strategic priorities and a historical reluctance to maintain a large standing arm ...

Here’s what you’ll find in our full summary

Registered users get access to the Full Podcast Summary and Additional Materials. It’s easy and free!
Start your free trial today

The US military before WWI

Additional Materials

Clarifications

  • The Minutemen tradition in the context of the U.S. military history refers to the practice of having citizen-soldiers who were ready for rapid deployment in times of need. These soldiers were expected to be able to assemble quickly, often within minutes ("minutes men"), hence the name. The tradition originated from the American Revolutionary War when local militia members were ready to respond swiftly to threats. This approach valued agility and speed in response to emergencies over maintaining a large permanent military force.
  • The historical reluctance to maintain a large standing army in the United States stemmed from concerns about the potential threat a powerful military force could pose to civil liberties. This perspective was influenced by the country's founding principles and a desire to avoid the centralized control associated with a large standing army. The preference for a smaller, more agile military force was also shaped by the Minutemen tradition, which valued rapid mobilization over a permanent military presence. This approach allowed the U.S. to focus on naval power and quick responses to threats rather than maintaining a large standing army.
  • A large standing army could threaten civil liberties by potentially being used by the ...

Counterarguments

  • The size of the U.S. military in 1914, while modest, may not fully represent the country's military capacity, as it could rapidly expand through conscription and mobilization of the National Guard.
  • Focusing on naval power might have left the U.S. unprepared for the trench warfare and land battles that characterized WWI, suggesting a potential oversight in military preparedness.
  • Prioritizing sea confrontations could be seen as neglecting the importance of a balanced force capable of addressing multiple types of military engagements.
  • Adherence to the Minutemen tradition may have been idealistic and not entirely practical in the face of modern warfare, which required well-trained and ready standing forces.
  • Valuing a swiftly mobilizable force over a large standing army assumes that there will always be sufficient time for mo ...

Get access to the context and additional materials

So you can understand the full picture and form your own opinion.
Get access for free
World War I | "Heaven, Hell, or Hoboken" | 5

Domestic politics around US entry into WWI

As President Woodrow Wilson navigated through a turbulent period, the decision on whether or not to enter World War I was met with divergent pressures from within the United States.

President Woodrow Wilson faced pressure from both interventionists and isolationists as he tried to keep the US out of the war for as long as possible.

Theodore Roosevelt, a Republican and vociferous former president, emerged as a significant interventionist voice, strongly advocating for the U.S. to join Britain and France in the war effort. At the same time, President Wilson was also grappling with internal pressures steering him away from the conflict. Populists in the South and West vehemently opposed large military involvements, fearing the implications of war. Additionally, substantial opposition came from German Americans who were concerned about the U.S. entering a war against Germany, their ancestral homeland.

Wilson personally sympathized with the Allied cause, but believed a negotiated peace could end the war without US entry.

Despite the external pressures to enter the war, Wilson admired Britain's political system and ethos during that time, which aligned him more with the British and French interests. However, a careful examination of Wilson's limited personal documents indicates his leanings towards peace and his hope for a diplomatic solution to emerge, circumventing the need for U.S. military involvement.

The National Defense valid Act of 1916 anticipated US involvement by expanding the military and giving the federal government power to mobilize th ...

Here’s what you’ll find in our full summary

Registered users get access to the Full Podcast Summary and Additional Materials. It’s easy and free!
Start your free trial today

Domestic politics around US entry into WWI

Additional Materials

Clarifications

  • President Wilson faced pressure from interventionists like Theodore Roosevelt, who wanted the U.S. to join the war, and from isolationists who opposed military involvement. Populists in the South and West were against entering the war due to fears about its consequences. German Americans were also against U.S. involvement in a war against Germany, their ancestral homeland.
  • Theodore Roosevelt, a former U.S. president and prominent Republican figure, advocated for the United States to join World War I alongside Britain and France. He believed in the importance of American intervention to support the Allied cause and promote democracy on the global stage. Roosevelt's interventionist stance contrasted with President Wilson's initial efforts to keep the U.S. out of the war, reflecting a significant divide in American political perspectives at the time.
  • Populists in the South and West opposed large military involvements due to fears about the implications of war on their communities and the nation. They were concerned about the potential economic and social costs of engaging in a large-scale conflict. Populists often prioritized domestic issues and were wary of entanglements that could divert resources away from addressing internal challenges. Their opposition reflected a broader sentiment within certain regions of the United States during that time.
  • German Americans had concerns about the U.S. entering a war against Germany due to their ancestral ties to Germany and fears of being seen as disloyal to their heritage. They worried about potential backlash and discrimination within the U.S. if the country went to war against their homeland. This sentiment was fueled by a sense of loyalty to Germany and a desire to avoid conflict that could negatively impact their community.
  • Wilson admired Britain's political system due to its parliamentary democracy, which contrasted with the American presidential system. He appreciated the efficiency a ...

Counterarguments

  • While Wilson faced pressure from both sides, some historians argue that his actions, such as the National Defense Act of 1916, suggest he may have been leaning towards intervention well before the actual declaration of war.
  • Roosevelt's advocacy for war could be seen as consistent with his earlier expansionist and militaristic policies, which some critics argue were more about American imperialism than supporting democracy.
  • The opposition from populists in the South and West was not solely based on a fear of large military involvements but also on concerns about the economic and social costs of war, as well as a skepticism of entangling alliances.
  • The stance of German Americans could be viewed as a complex mix of ethnic solidarity, anti-British sentiment, and pacifism, rather than a simple opposition to fighting against Germany.
  • Wilson's sympathy for the Allied cause might be criticized for not being neutral, as his administration took actions that favored the Allies, such as extending them credit and supplying arms.
  • Admiration for Britain's political system does not necessarily equate to a desire for peace, as Britain was one of the major belligerents in the war.
  • The hope for a diplomatic solution ...

Get access to the context and additional materials

So you can understand the full picture and form your own opinion.
Get access for free
World War I | "Heaven, Hell, or Hoboken" | 5

Military mobilization and training

During World War I, the United States underwent a profound transformation in its military mobilization and training methods, enabled by the 1917 Selective Service Act—a major shift in American tradition towards a rapid and community-involved expansion of its armed forces.

The 1917 Selective Service Act instituted a draft to rapidly expand the US armed forces, which was a major departure from American tradition.

The Selective Service Act of 1917 was transformative for American military history, marking a radical departure from earlier traditions without a regularized draft process. Men between 21 to 30 years of age, and later expanded to those between 18 to 45, were required to register for potential service—not immediate induction—in the armed forces. The act modeled its structure after European conscription laws, like Britain's, carefully balancing the need for soldiers with the need to maintain the labor force essential for industry and production at home.

It was during this time the U.S. government built 32 training camps across the country, strategically located in both the north and the south to unify the nation post-Civil War and to expand the military's reach. Recruits were rushed through these facilities, which were like small cities complete with hospitals, schools, and theaters. Despite being rapidly processed—usually within two to three months and outfitted for deployment to Europe—many recruits found themselves training with inadequate or obsolete equipment like wooden rifles. They did not handle modern rifles until they arrived in France.

The draft registration and training process aimed to create a sense of community involvement rather than top-down militarization.

To humanize and localize the registration process and encourage community engagement, the draft was administered at local, community-centric places like post offices and church basements. This approach meant that selection and training of soldiers for the Great War became a community-involved effort, contrasting starkly with previous top-down militarization.

New recruits were inducted through a system called entrainment, which involved traveling by train to the military camps for their abbreviated and often chaotic preparation for war. Their rapid transition from civilians to soldiers, usually in a disorienting and hectic environment, was aimed at meeting the urgent need for military personnel overseas.

New recruits often lacked proper equipment and training when first deploying to Europe, requiring them to learn on the job ...

Here’s what you’ll find in our full summary

Registered users get access to the Full Podcast Summary and Additional Materials. It’s easy and free!
Start your free trial today

Military mobilization and training

Additional Materials

Clarifications

  • Assembly line techniques in military camps during World War I involved organizing soldiers' training and preparation in a systematic, efficient manner similar to how products move along an assembly line in a factory. This method ensured that recruits received standardized training and equipment quickly, enhancing the speed and effectiveness of mobilization efforts. By streamlining processes like outfitting soldiers, weapon training, and deployment readiness, the military could efficiently handle the large influx of personnel during wartim ...

Counterarguments

  • The 1917 Selective Service Act, while a departure from previous American tradition, could be seen as a necessary response to the unprecedented scale of World War I, rather than a radical shift in philosophy.
  • The Act's modeling after European conscription laws might be criticized for not fully considering the unique social and political context of the United States.
  • The strategic location of training camps to unify the nation post-Civil War might be viewed as a secondary benefit rather than a primary intention.
  • The use of inadequate or obsolete equipment during training could be criticized as a failure of logistics and foresight, potentially compromising the effectiveness of the troops.
  • The community involvement in the draft registration process, while intended to be humanizing, could also be seen as a way to spread the responsibility and potential backlash for conscription across local communities.
  • The rapid training and deployment of troops might be criticized for potentially sacrificing the quality and preparedness of soldiers for the sake of expediency.
  • The assembly line techniques used in the camps could be critiqued for treating soldiers as mere cogs in a military machine, possibly neglecting the individual needs and well-being of the ...

Get access to the context and additional materials

So you can understand the full picture and form your own opinion.
Get access for free
World War I | "Heaven, Hell, or Hoboken" | 5

The experience of African American troops

The experience of African American soldiers in the US military during times of war was a journey of profound contrasts, marked by segregation and discrimination at home but a taste of more equitable treatment abroad. Their service was transformative, reshaping their perspective on civil rights upon their return to the United States.

African American soldiers faced segregation and discrimination in the US military, but service in Europe exposed them to more equitable treatment.

African American soldiers entered the military knowing that their service was a chance to demonstrate their worth to America. Despite this, white American elites were reluctant to arm and train them, often relegating them to labor battalions or service roles. The heavy work of unloading materials in Europe was mostly undertaken by African American soldiers assigned to these labor battalions.

They faced the challenge of a segregated army and a president who maintained segregationist policies. Yet, serving in Europe was a transformative experience. Away from the rigid structures of segregation that were rampant in early 20th century America, African American soldiers encountered a different kind of racism, one that did not enforce the explicit barriers they were accustomed to.

The exploits of the Harlem Hellfighters and other black combat units earned them respect, but they still faced racism and violence upon returning home.

African American troops, particularly those who served under French command, experienced fewer restrictions and more opportunities for combat. The Harlem Hellfighters and other black combat units often endured some of the war's toughest conditions and prolonged engagements on the front lines.

The contrast between their treatment in Europe and the US transformed African American lesson view on ...

Here’s what you’ll find in our full summary

Registered users get access to the Full Podcast Summary and Additional Materials. It’s easy and free!
Start your free trial today

The experience of African American troops

Additional Materials

Clarifications

  • Labor battalions were units within the military where soldiers were assigned to perform manual labor tasks instead of combat duties. In the context of African American soldiers during times of war, they were often relegated to labor battalions, where they would undertake tasks like unloading materials. These soldiers faced segregation and discrimination within these units, reflecting broader societal inequalities. Labor battalions were a significant aspect of the African American troops' experience in the US military during periods of conflict.
  • The Harlem Hellfighters were a nickname for the 369th Infantry Regiment, an African American unit that served during World War I. They gained recognition for their bravery and resilience in combat, facing discrimination and segregation both in the U.S. military and upon their return home. Their experiences highlighted the challenges African American soldiers faced during the war and in post-war America.
  • Black politics encompasses the political activities, movements, and ideologies aimed at advancing the interests and rights of Black people. It includes efforts to achieve self-determination, challenge systemic racism, and create institutions that promote the collective well-being of Black communities. Black politics often involves advocating for social, economic, and political empowerment within the context of racial equality and justice. The term "Black politics" can also reference the specific strategies and actions tak ...

Counterarguments

...

Get access to the context and additional materials

So you can understand the full picture and form your own opinion.
Get access for free
World War I | "Heaven, Hell, or Hoboken" | 5

Key battles and incidents on the front lines

The Meuse-Argonne offensive in 1918 stands as a crucial chapter in the annals of World War I, showcasing the mettle and determination of American troops as they confronted the horrors of trench warfare.

The Meuse-Argonne offensive in 1918 was a decisive campaign where US troops played a major role in breaking through German defenses.

The Meuse-Argonne region, by the war's end, had become a landscape of devastation. It was here that the American Expeditionary Forces, about 1 million strong, launched their largest and one of the most successful offenses against the German fortifications. This pivotal moment was instrumental in turning the tide of the war in favor of the Allies.

The story of the "Lost Battalion", surrounded and under friendly fire, highlights the bravery and resilience of American soldiers.

In October 1918, a significant contingent of the U.S. forces, led by Major Charles Whittlesey, engaged in what would become a grim tale of resilience. Nine companies of the U.S. 77th Division executed a synchronized attack on the German line but found themselves cut off and isolated in the Argonne Forest. Stranded on the north slope of a ravine, the roughly 550 men of the "Lost Battalion" endured the lethal error of friendly fire. Despite their dire situation and facing relentless assaults from German forces, Major Whittlesey and his men held fast, refused to capitulate, and miraculously held out until rescue.

Carrier pigeons like Cher Ami were crucial for communicating and saving lives in the chaos of trench warfare.

Communication lines severed, and couriers unable to breach the surrounding h ...

Here’s what you’ll find in our full summary

Registered users get access to the Full Podcast Summary and Additional Materials. It’s easy and free!
Start your free trial today

Key battles and incidents on the front lines

Additional Materials

Clarifications

  • The Meuse-Argonne offensive in 1918 was a major World War I battle where American troops played a crucial role in breaking through German defenses in France. It was one of the largest and most successful offensives of the war, involving about 1 million American soldiers. The campaign was instrumental in turning the tide of the war in favor of the Allies, marking a significant moment in the conflict.
  • Trench warfare was a dominant military strategy in World War I, characterized by soldiers fighting from elaborate systems of trenches dug into the ground. It involved static, defensive positions where troops faced harsh conditions like mud, disease, and constant threat of enemy attacks. Trenches provided protection but also led to a stalemate as both sides struggled to make significant advances. The close proximity of opposing trenches often resulted in brutal hand-to-hand combat and heavy casualties. Artillery bombardments and the use of barbed wire added to the challenges and dangers faced by soldiers in the trenches.
  • The "Lost Battalion" incident during World War I involved a group of American soldiers from the 77th Division who became surrounded by German forces in the Argonne Forest in October 1918. Led by Major Charles Whittlesey, these soldiers were cut off from their own lines and endured friendly fire. Despite their dire situation, they held out against German attacks until they were eventually rescu ...

Counterarguments

  • While the Meuse-Argonne offensive was indeed significant, it was one of several decisive campaigns in 1918, and the cumulative effect of Allied operations was necessary to break German defenses.
  • The American Expeditionary Forces played a crucial role in the Meuse-Argonne offensive, but the success was also due to the coordinated efforts of French and other Allied troops.
  • The "Lost Battalion" story is a powerful narrative of resilience, but it also raises questions about the tactical decisions that led to their isolation and the overall cost in human lives for such standoffs.
  • The use of carrier pigeons like Cher Ami was important, but it was just one aspect of a complex communication network that included runners, signal lamps, telephones, and radios.
  • The bravery of the American soldiers is unquestionable, but the narrative often overshadows the experiences and contributions of soldiers from other nations involved in the Meuse-Argonne and other battles of World War I.
  • The focus on American involvement in the Meuse-Argonne offensive sometimes overlooks the prolonged suffering and contributions of civilian populations in the ...

Get access to the context and additional materials

So you can understand the full picture and form your own opinion.
Get access for free
World War I | "Heaven, Hell, or Hoboken" | 5

The end of the war and the legacy of WWI

The First World War's conclusion brought not only an abrupt end to the fighting but also lasting influences on international relations and military practices.

The sudden end of fighting on November 11, 1918 left the massive American Expeditionary Force in a state of flux as the troops were rapidly demobilized.

On the final day of conflict, troops were still preparing to be deployed. However, at 11 a.m. on November 11, 1918, when the armistice came into effect, this operation ground to a halt. Trains loaded with soldiers ready for battle stopped and turned around, tasked instead with returning these men to their homes, signalling a sudden and dramatic end to their wartime duties and beginning the process of transition to peacetime.

American military cemeteries in Europe remain as solemn reminders of the immense sacrifices made by US soldiers.

While the troops were sent back home, the legacy of their sacrifice remains unmistakably etched across Europe's landscape in the form of military cemeteries. These sacred grounds continue to remind visitors of the immense cost of the conflict and the lives of those American soldiers who gave everything in distant lands.

The rapid expansion and mode ...

Here’s what you’ll find in our full summary

Registered users get access to the Full Podcast Summary and Additional Materials. It’s easy and free!
Start your free trial today

The end of the war and the legacy of WWI

Additional Materials

Clarifications

  • The American Expeditionary Forces (AEF) was a formation of the United States Armed Forces during World War I, primarily composed of U.S. Army units. Led by General John J. Pershing, the AEF played a significant role on the Western Front, fighting alongside Allied forces against the Imperial German Army. The AEF's involvement in key offensives like the Battle of Saint-Mihiel and the Meuse-Argonne Offensive marked important milestones in the war. The AEF's contributions were crucial in shaping the outcome of World War I and had lasting impacts on American military capabilities and global influence.
  • An armistice is a formal agreement between warring parties to stop fighting, often marking a temporary cessation of hostilities while peace negotiations take place. It is different from a peace treaty, which signifies a more permanent resolution to a conflict. Armistices are legally binding agreements under international law and can precede the formal end of a war.
  • During World War I, the mobilization and modernization of the US military involved rapidly expanding the armed forces, equipping them with new technologies like tanks and airplanes, and improving logistical capabilities to support large-scale operations. This process aimed to transform the US military into a more efficient and effective fighting force to meet the demands of modern warfare. The war served as a catalyst for significant advan ...

Counterarguments

  • The conclusion of WWI did have lasting influences, but it also led to the Treaty of Versailles, which many historians argue planted the seeds for WWII due to its harsh terms on Germany.
  • While the American Expeditionary Force experienced a state of flux at the war's end, other nations' forces faced even more severe challenges, including revolutions and civil wars, as seen in Russia and Germany.
  • The rapid demobilization of troops after the armistice was not unique to the American forces and was part of a broader trend among all combatant nations.
  • American military cemeteries are indeed solemn reminders of sacrifice, but they also represent a fraction of the total casualties of WWI, with many other nations having suffered high ...

Get access to the context and additional materials

So you can understand the full picture and form your own opinion.
Get access for free

Create Summaries for anything on the web

Download the Shortform Chrome extension for your browser

Shortform Extension CTA