Tulsi Gabbard on Russiagate Hoax Evidence and How She’s Reforming Politicized Intelligence Agencies

Tulsi Gabbard and other sources have raised serious allegations concerning the handling of intelligence related to the Trump campaign and potential Russian collusion.

Intel Crafted False Trump-Russia Collusion Narrative to Undermine Trump

The intelligence community's handling of the Russia investigation during the 2016 election has come under scrutiny for reportedly crafting a false narrative.

Intel Report on 2016 Russian Election Interference Called Politicized, Contradicts Earlier "No Impact" Claims

An intelligence report on Russian election interference in January 2017 has been criticized for being a total reversal of earlier intelligence community assessments that stated that Russia did not impact the outcome of the US election. This assessment was called politicized, as it contradicted the stance prior to President Trump's electoral win, where it was assessed that Putin had neither the intent nor the capability to hack the election outcome. Post-election, intelligence reports to Congress affirmed that there was no evidence of Russian interference affecting the election results.

Classified Intelligence Hidden From Congress Over Credibility Concerns, Including the Fabricated Steele Dossier

The most confidential pieces of intelligence, which influenced the January 2017 assessment, were kept from Congress due to concerns about their credibility. Specifically, the Steele dossier, central to the January 2017 Intelligence Community Assessment (ICA), was criticized as a politically fabricated document. Senior CIA officials reportedly objected to the inclusion of the Steele dossier and other sources that were deemed not credible by then CIA director John Brennan.

Tulsi Gabbard suggests that the intelligence was manipulated, and hints at the FBI using known false information—a reference to concerns over the credibility of the Steele dossier.

Leadership Manipulated Intelligence to Falsely Claim Trump-Russia Collusion, Despite Staff Finding No Evidence

It is implied that leadership within the FBI and other intelligence agencies might have manipulated intelligence to falsely claim there was collusion between Trump's campaign and Russia, despite their own staff findings presenting no evidence to support it. This manipulation has raised allegations that there was a politicized effort to undermine President Trump.

The precedence of the December 8 President’s Daily Brief, meant for President Obama, corroborated earlier assessments of no Russian interference in the election outcome. This briefing was pulled ...

Recent revelations and historical contexts suggest that the intelligence community has a history of politicization that may have continued into actions allegedly aimed at undermining President Donald Trump.

Intelligence Community's History of Politicization, As in the Iraq War

Bush Administration Pressured Officials to Produce Intelligence Supporting Iraq War, Despite Contradictory Assessments

James Clapper admitted that, during the Iraq War, intelligence community members were pressured by then-Vice President Dick Cheney to create a narrative to justify going to war. The intelligence falsely alleged weapons of mass destruction and ties between Saddam Hussein and Al-Qaeda. This politicization of intelligence led to the devastating consequences of the Iraq War.

Politicized Intelligence Used to Justify War Reveals Dangerous Consequences

The Iraq War serves as a stark example of the dangerous consequences of politicized intelligence, which led to a war based on false premises.

Obama-Era Intel Allegedly Undermined Trump With Russiagate Claims

False Narrative of Trump as Russian Asset Created by Control Over Intelligence

Tulsi Gabbard adds that after Donald Trump's unexpected win in 2016, there were efforts by Democrat leaders to undermine his presidency. They believed they were protecting America from him. President Obama reportedly ordered a politicized intelligence assessment that created a false narrative of Trump as a Russian asset.

Attempt to Usurp Voters' Will and Subvert Democracy

Gabbard reveals that in 2017, behind-the-scenes exchanges between James Clapper, Obama's Director of National Intelligence, and Mike Rogers, then head of the NSA, show Clapper pressuring Rogers to endorse a not fully vetted intelligence document. This aimed to support the Russiagate narrative and undermine Trump's presidency, subverting the democratic process and the will of the voter ...

Tulsi Gabbard has undertaken reforms within the intelligence community, particularly focused on the Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI), to remove politicization and refocus on the mission.

Gabbard Reforms ODNI to Refocus Mission and Remove Politicization

Streamlined Team and Leadership For Mission Focus

Gabbard has made significant changes within the ODNI, trimming down personnel to ensure that the right people are in the proper positions and focused on the mission. Her reforms are motivated by the need to do what is right and establish a culture of leadership centered on responsibility to the American people and adherence to the Constitution.

Gabbard Cultivates Accountability, Integrity, and Constitutional Commitment in the Intelligence Community

Gabbard emphasizes accountability within the intelligence community, holding individuals responsible if they fail to fulfill their duties. She underscores the necessity of cultivating integrity and a commitment to constitutional principles within intelligence practices.

Gabbard Sent Declassified Russiagate Documents To the DOJ For Accountability

Evidence: Intelligence Manipulated, Politicized to Undermine Trump

Gabbard uncovered, declassified, and released documents that indicated intelligence was manipulated and politicized in an attempt to undermine President Trump's administration and affect the outcome of the 2016 election. The revealed documentation, like the Durham Annex, included information such as the FBI obtaining warrants through the FISA court to surveil Americans associated with Tru ...

Tulsi Gabbard's political journey has seen her transition from a Democratic representative to a supporter of President Trump, marking a significant shift in her political alignment.

Gabbard's Values Once Aligned With Democrats, but the Party Shifted

Gabbard joined the Democratic Party at age 21 in Hawaii because it championed values such as fighting for working people, protecting the environment, and upholding free speech. She notes, however, that the Democratic Party has drastically changed and is unrecognizable from what it was during the times of JFK and Martin Luther King.

Gabbard Criticizes Democrats, Supports Trump

Tulsi Gabbard traveled across the country for President Trump's campaign, encountering unity and a positive atmosphere, even in traditionally Democratic districts. This unity was demonstrated as people from various political affiliations, including Democrats, showed their support for her and the campaign.

Gabbard Aligned With Trump On Protecting U.S. Sovereignty and Democracy From Foreign Interference

Gabbard has taken actions that align with Trump's stated objectives, such as upholding U.S. sovereignty and protecting democracy from foreign interference. For example, she declassified and released documents related to the Russiagate hoax. She stresses the importance of American accountability and the need to choose leaders who uphold the integrity of the republic and the Constitution. Gabbard warns against abuses that ca ...

Tulsi Gabbard, with her military experience serving in Iraq, has shaped her strategies on foreign policy, especially concerning Iran and the threat of drug cartels.

Gabbard's Military Experience Shaped Her Iran Strike Strategy

Gabbard Stressed Clear Objectives and Exit Strategies in Military Action

Tulsi Gabbard's firsthand experience with the costs of war during her service in a medical unit in Iraq led her to pursue Congress to be at the forefront of critical war and foreign policy decisions. She underscored the necessity of having well-defined objectives and well-planned exit strategies for military actions to reflect America's best interests.

Precision Iran Strike Achieves Objective Without Escalating Conflict

Gabbard admired President Trump's leadership style and his approach to Iran. She was unyielding in her stance that Iran should not have the capability to develop nuclear weapons and advocated for a precise strike targeting Iran's nuclear potential, military infrastructure, and economic stability, stressing a clear objective that wouldn't exacerbate the conflict.

Gabbard also highlighted the importance of learning from historical regime changes, showing the complexities of international interventions and their long-term repercussions.

Gabbard Backed Labeling Drug Cartels as Foreign Terrorists to Protect Americans

During her time in administration, Gabbard supported the move to designate cartels as terrorist organizations, mindful of the advanced tactics and weaponry that threaten American communities, especially those near the border.

Cartels Employ Advanced Tactics, Weaponry, Threatening Border Communities

Gabbard brought attention to the violence and crime inflicted by cartels, such as MS-13, on U.S. streets. She referred to cartels employing advanced tactics, including the use of IEDs, which was highlighted by an incident on a Texas ranch that resulted in the death of ranch hands. Cartels' use of sophisticated arsenal and intelligence strategies, from surveillance to countermeasures, poses significant challenges.

Leveraging Intelligence Resources Against Cartels Is Crucial F ...