Podcasts > 99% Invisible > The Power Broker #03: David Sims

The Power Broker #03: David Sims

By Roman Mars

The 99% Invisible episode explores the relentless ambition and unapologetic tactics of Robert Moses in expanding public infrastructure and green spaces in New York. It details how Moses wielded his growing power, appropriating land from farmers and landowners, often resorting to coercion, illegal methods, and ethical breaches to achieve his vision.

While his projects were hugely popular with the public and provided recreational spaces, this episode also examines the criticism Moses faced for his authoritarianism and lack of compromise, as well as the questionable legal practices he deployed to overcome obstacles. His controversial tenure as Secretary of State and his struggles with reforming the corrupt boxing industry provide insight into the depths he would go to control government operations for his grand plans.

Listen to the original

The Power Broker #03: David Sims

This is a preview of the Shortform summary of the Mar 16, 2024 episode of the 99% Invisible

Sign up for Shortform to access the whole episode summary along with additional materials like counterarguments and context.

The Power Broker #03: David Sims

1-Page Summary

Robert Moses continues to expand his power and influence, pursues land for his parkways ruthlessly

Robert Moses expands park spaces in Long Island aggressively, managing to grow state parks to 9,700 acres across 14 parks. He employs strategies such as using connections to obtain lands in unethical manners, coercing local governments through threats, and appropriating land illegally. His tactics illustrate a relentless pursuit to complete his public infrastructure projects.

Moses clashes with Long Island farmers and land barons over parkway routes

Moses encounters resistance from Long Island farmers and landowners regarding the routes of his parkways. He typically refuses concessions to landholders but makes exceptions for affluent individuals like Otto Kahn. Small farmers, unable to fight back against his influence, often suffer devastating losses, such as James Roth, whose farm is irreparably divided by parkway construction.

Moses shows increasing arrogance and refusal to compromise as his power grows

Moses’ approach becomes increasingly dismissive and authoritarian as his power escalates. He belittles advisory boards, ignores dissent, and orchestrates the systematic erasure of Ansley Wilcox from Niagara park history. Moses' arrogance is illustrated by his reluctance to acknowledge any ethical deviations, including issues relating to the AutoCon incident.

Al Smith continues to protect and enable Moses despite controversies

Al Smith safeguards Moses against criticism and provides political and financial support for his projects. Smith diffuses Republican opposition to Moses and delays legislative action strategically to increase public support for parks. These tactics, along with rallying public support, emphasizing the class struggle aspect, and personally intervening to resolve Moses' financial issues, culminate in Smith's crucial role in empowering Moses.

Moses becomes Secretary of State for New York, gains more power and responsibilities

Moses becomes Secretary of State for New York, gaining control over licensing and state construction. He encounters challenges in regulating the corrupt boxing industry and after attempting reforms, ultimately withdraws from the field. His tenure as Secretary demonstrates his command over jobs and patronage but also exposes the complexity of corralling all facets of government operations.

Moses takes on regulation of boxing in New York, struggles with corruption there

Moses finds combating corruption in boxing formidable and after initial reform attempts, he backs down. His reluctance to press on reveals the limitations of his political determination when faced with a resistant industry.

Moses pushes his employees extremely hard, some crack under the strain

Moses maintains a grueling work environment, with extensive hours, exemplified by the hardships endured during projects such as Jones Beach. The stress results in significant health consequences for staff, including alcoholism, breakdowns, and marital strife. Moses fosters a culture of relentless productivity, illustrating the personal toll of his ambitious developments.

Moses makes deals and comprises with the wealthy but refuses to bend for regular citizens

The section on how Moses engages with the wealthy is not elaborated upon due to missing content.

Moses’ development of parks and beaches garners public adoration even as he frequently operates outside legal and ethical boundaries. The end goal – the creation of popular recreational areas – often justifies his means, from redirecting funds to flouting legal injunctions. Public support and the sunk cost fallacy allow for continued funding, casting a shadow on the legacy of Moses’ developments as they come at the cost of legal and ethical integrity.

1-Page Summary

Additional Materials

Clarifications

  • Ansley Wilcox was a prominent figure in Buffalo, New York, known for his historical significance related to Theodore Roosevelt. The systematic erasure from Niagara park history may suggest deliberate efforts to diminish or erase Wilcox's contributions or presence from the historical narrative associated with the development or management of parks in the Niagara region. This erasure could indicate a deliberate attempt to downplay or remove Wilcox's involvement or impact on the history of the parks in the area, possibly due to personal or political reasons.
  • Al Smith, a prominent political figure, played a crucial role in supporting and empowering Robert Moses despite controversies. Smith provided political and financial backing for Moses' projects, diffused opposition, and strategically delayed legislative actions to bolster public support for park developments. His actions helped solidify Moses' influence and advance his ambitious infrastructure projects.
  • Moses often made concessions and deals with wealthy individuals, granting them special treatment or exceptions in his projects. However, when it came to regular citizens or small landowners, he typically refused to accommodate their needs or concerns, prioritizing his own vision and objectives over their interests. This disparity in treatment highlighted Moses' tendency to favor the influential and powerful while disregarding the struggles of ordinary people in his pursuit of public infrastructure development.
  • Regulating the corrupt boxing industry involves overseeing a sport historically plagued by bribery, fixed matches, and exploitation of fighters. It requires implementing measures to ensure fair competition, protect athletes' rights, and maintain the sport's integrity. Addressing corruption in boxing demands navigating complex relationships with promoters, managers, and regulatory bodies while enforcing rules and regulations to uphold the sport's credibility. Efforts to combat corruption may face challenges due to entrenched interests, lack of transparency, and resistance to change within the industry.
  • The sunk cost fallacy is a cognitive bias where individuals continue an endeavor because of the time, money, or effort already invested, regardless of the future payoff. In Robert Moses' case, the public support and the significant investments made in his projects led to a justification of his actions, even when they involved breaking laws or rules. This fallacy can cloud judgment and lead to decisions that prioritize past investments over present circumstances or future outcomes.

Counterarguments

  • Robert Moses' aggressive expansion of park spaces could be seen as a visionary effort to provide public recreational areas, which many argue have long-term benefits for society.
  • The clash with farmers and landowners may be viewed as an unfortunate but necessary consequence of large-scale infrastructure development, which often requires difficult decisions and sacrifices for the greater good.
  • Moses' perceived arrogance and refusal to compromise might be interpreted as a strong leadership style required to push through important public works projects in the face of opposition and bureaucratic inertia.
  • Al Smith's protection and enablement of Moses could be argued as a recognition of the importance of Moses' work and the need for strong leadership to achieve significant public goals.
  • Moses' tenure as Secretary of State for New York, despite the challenges with the boxing industry, could be seen as an example of a public servant attempting to tackle entrenched corruption, even if not entirely successfully.
  • The hard work environment created by Moses might be justified by the scale and ambition of the projects he undertook, which required a high level of dedication and effort to complete.
  • The building of popular parks and beaches, even if accompanied by legal and ethical breaches, could be argued as having provided significant and lasting benefits to the public, which might outweigh the negative aspects of how they were achieved.

Get access to the context and additional materials

So you can understand the full picture and form your own opinion.
Get access for free
The Power Broker #03: David Sims

Robert Moses continues to expand his power and influence, pursues land for his parkways ruthlessly

As the end of Al Smith's governorship approaches, Robert Moses rapidly acquires land for parkways and state parks, leveraging his connections and bending rules to amass more property than ever before for his projects.

Robert Moses resorts to utilizing government-owned land and trading deals to acquire land at a fraction of its market value. He expands Long Island's state park space from 200 acres to 9,700 acres across 14 parks in less than three years.

Obtains 600 acres of Fire Island through Yale classmate

In one instance, Moses turns to a Yale classmate, who happens to work for Herbert Hoover, the Secretary of Commerce, to acquire 600 acres on Fire Island Beach that is critical for his parkway projects. These lands are secured not through typical means but through connections and favors, employing strategies from early in his career, such as making agreements with adversaries to achieve his objectives.

Takes advantage of laws and political connections

Appropriates Taylor estate in an act later ruled illegal

Moses's use of political connections further manifests when a politically connected lawyer forms a corporation specifically to purchase 265 acres of land necessary for the Meadowbrook Causeway. Additionally, with the support of Nassau County GOP boss G. Wilbur Dowdy, Moses secures building contracts for Dowdy's brother-in-law's contractor.

Despite an initial referendum loss, Moses gains control of Jones Beach after a successful reversal vote. He also acquires miles of land from the Nassau County Board of Supervisors to proceed with the Southern State Parkway, combining this land with New York City-owned property.

Forces land sales in unethical ways

Coerces local governments to give desired land through threats

Moses learns that Babylon Township has been leasing out "Bay Bottom" without legal ownership, a revelation he uses to blackmail the town council. He pressures them into a referendum to give him the Jones Beach land, threate ...

Here’s what you’ll find in our full summary

Registered users get access to the Full Podcast Summary and Additional Materials. It’s easy and free!
Start your free trial today

Robert Moses continues to expand his power and influence, pursues land for his parkways ruthlessly

Additional Materials

Clarifications

  • Robert Moses was a highly influential urban planner and public official in the New York metropolitan area during the early to mid-20th century. He spearheaded numerous large-scale infrastructure projects and wielded significant power through various government positions and public authorities. Moses was known for his ambitious development projects, including the construction of parks, parkways, bridges, and highways that shaped the modern landscape of New York City and the surrounding region. His methods often involved leveraging political connections, exploiting legal loopholes, and using coercive tactics to acquire land and push through his initiatives.
  • Al Smith was a prominent American politician who served as the governor of New York and was the Democratic Party's presidential nominee in 1928. He was known for his urban reforms and was the first Roman Catholic to be nominated for president by a major party. Smith's political career was closely associated with the Tammany Hall political machine in New York City.
  • The Meadowbrook Causeway, also known as the Meadowbrook State Parkway, is a controlled-access road in Nassau County, New York. It was part of Robert Moses's plan to connect various parks in the region, including Jones Beach State Park. Construction of the parkway began in 1933 and was completed in 1934 with financial assistance from the Reconstruction Finance Corporation. The Meadowbrook Parkway is a significant component of the New York State parkway system.
  • G. Wilbur Dowdy was a prominent figure in Nassau County politics, serving as the GOP (Republican Party) boss. He wielded significant influence within the party and played a role in supporting Robert Moses's projects by assisting in securing building contracts for his relatives. Dowdy's connections and support were instrumental in facilitating Moses's endeavors in Nassau County.
  • Jones Beach is a popular state park located on Long Island, New York. It was developed by Robert Moses in the early 20th century and is known for its beautiful beaches, boardwalks, and recreational facilities. Moses played a significant role in the park's creation and expansion, using his influence to acquire the necessary land for its development. Jones Beach remains a beloved recreational destination for New Yorkers and visitors alike.
  • The Southern State Parkway is a controlled-access highway on Long Island, New York, designed by Robert Moses and opened in 1927. It spans from Nassau County to Suffolk County, connecting with the Heckscher State Parkway. Moses played a significant role in its construction as part of his extensive infrastructure projects in the region. The parkway's development and expansion were integral to the growth and modernization of Long Island's transportation network.
  • Babylon Township is a part of Suffolk County, New York, encompassing various communities including Amityville and Babylon. It borders Nassau County to the west and the Atlantic Ocean to the south. The town was officially established in 1872 through a division of the Town of Huntington.
  • Fire Island Beach is a part of Fire Island, which is a barrier island of ...

Counterarguments

  • Robert Moses's actions, while aggressive, were a product of the times and the political and economic environment, which often required strong leadership and decisive action to accomplish large-scale public works.
  • The expansion of park space and the development of parkways could be seen as a public good that provided numerous benefits to the citizens, such as increased access to recreation and improved transportation infrastructure.
  • The acquisition of land at below-market value can be defended as a cost-saving measure for the public, ensuring that taxpayer funds were used efficiently in the creation of public spaces.
  • The use of political connections might be viewed as a necessary means to navigate the complex political landscape of the time and to overcome bureaucratic inertia to achieve goals that served the public interest.
  • The reversal vote for Jones Beach control could be interpreted as a legitimate exercise of democracy, where the initial outcome was reconsidered by the public in light of new information or changing opinions.
  • The referendum in Babylon Township, while controversial, could be argued to have been conducted within the legal framework available at the time, and it ultimately led to the development of a public resource.
  • The pressure on Long Island real estate brokers to adopt Moses's vision for zoning and development might b ...

Get access to the context and additional materials

So you can understand the full picture and form your own opinion.
Get access for free
The Power Broker #03: David Sims

Moses clashes with Long Island farmers and land barons over parkway routes

The attempts by urban planner Robert Moses to build parkways across Long Island sparked contention, particularly with regards to which land would be used for these new routes.

Refuses minor concessions to appease landholders

Moses often visited Long Island farmers in the evenings, aiming to charm them into selling their land for his parkway projects. If these farmers showed resistance to selling their property, Moses did not hesitate to employ hardball tactics by threatening to condemn the property. Despite these aggressive strategies, wealthy landowners mounted significant resistance to Moses’ parkway plans, fearing that the public parks and roads would bring the "wrong kind of people" near their opulent estates.

Exceptions made for wealthy and politically connected

Shifts parkway route to appease Otto Kahn

Moses, known for his inflexibility, did make concessions for the wealthy and politically influential. For instance, he altered the Northern State Parkway route to avoid cutting through Otto Kahn's esteemed golf course after Kahn contributed $10,000 towards funding land surveys. The parkway's trajectory was also moved south multiple times to accommodate objections from other affluent landholders.

Crushes small farmers who cannot fight back

Cuts James Roth's farm in half with no compensation

In stark contrast, small farmers like Ja ...

Here’s what you’ll find in our full summary

Registered users get access to the Full Podcast Summary and Additional Materials. It’s easy and free!
Start your free trial today

Moses clashes with Long Island farmers and land barons over parkway routes

Additional Materials

Clarifications

  • Robert Moses was a prominent urban planner known for his influential role in shaping the infrastructure of New York City and its surrounding areas. Moses was known for his ambitious public works projects, including the construction of highways, bridges, and parks, which significantly impacted the urban landscape of the region. His approach often involved controversial tactics to acquire land for his projects, leading to conflicts with various stakeholders, including farmers and wealthy landowners. Moses wielded significant power and influence in urban development during his time, leaving a lasting legacy on the city's infrastructure.
  • Long Island, located in New York State, was a focal point for urban planner Robert Moses' parkway projects. The development of parkways on Long Island sparked conflicts between Moses, farmers, and wealthy landowners due to disputes over land usage and the impact on the local community. Moses' interactions with different stakeholders on Long Island, including farmers and affluent landholders, highlighted the power dynamics and tensions surrounding the construction of these parkways. The struggles faced by small farmers like James Roth underscored the unequal treatment and consequences of Moses' parkway development efforts on individuals with varying levels of influence and resources.
  • The parkway projects being discussed in the text are the Long Island parkways, particularly the Northern State Parkway. These parkways were part of urban planner Robert Moses' initiatives to develop road infrastructure in Long Island, New York, during the early to mid-20th century. Moses faced opposition from both small farmers and wealthy landowners while planning and constructing these parkways, leading to conflicts over land acquisition and route adjustments.
  • Robert Moses, a prominent urban planner, wielded significant power and influence in shaping infrastructure projects like parkways. Wealthy landowners, with their resources and connections, could often sway decisions in their favor through financial contributions or political influence. In contrast, sma ...

Counterarguments

  • Moses' tactics were a necessary evil to achieve the greater good of modernizing infrastructure and improving transportation for the public.
  • The resistance from wealthy landowners may have been based on legitimate concerns about privacy, security, and the preservation of their property values.
  • Altering the parkway route for influential individuals like Otto Kahn could be seen as pragmatic politics, ensuring funding and support for the projects.
  • The decisions made regarding the parkway routes may have been based on broader urban planning principles rather than individual influence or wealth.
  • The compensation for land acquisition might have been in line with legal standards of the time, even if it seems unfair from a modern perspective.
  • ...

Get access to the context and additional materials

So you can understand the full picture and form your own opinion.
Get access for free
The Power Broker #03: David Sims

Moses shows increasing arrogance and refusal to compromise as his power grows

As Robert Moses's authority expands, his attitude towards collaborators and critics becomes more dismissive and uncompromising.

Berates legislators over patronage

Moses begins to show his indifference to the opinions and authority of other key figures in governance. After securing the support he needs and acquiring power, Moses shows little respect for the budget requests from the State Parks Council and treats its members poorly, indicating his disregard for their differing methods and approaches.

Belittles advisory boards and ignores dissent

Moses targets anyone who opposes his swift and uncompromising development tactics, including spreading unfounded rumors. One notable example is his aggressive defamation of Ansley Wilcox and Judge Clearwater, whom he accuses of corruption, damaging their reputations.

Systematically erases Ansley Wilcox from Niagara park history

Despite Wilcox's persistence in trying to clear his name, Moses disregards his efforts. Wilcox's detailed letter is ignored and put away, leaving his work and contribution to Niagara park history virtually forgotten. Moses takes this erasure a step further by removing plaques with Wilcox's name and replacing them with his own. Places like the Robert Moses Parkway and the proposed Robert Moses Dam replace Wilcox's legacy in the park.

Roman Mars recount ...

Here’s what you’ll find in our full summary

Registered users get access to the Full Podcast Summary and Additional Materials. It’s easy and free!
Start your free trial today

Moses shows increasing arrogance and refusal to compromise as his power grows

Additional Materials

Clarifications

  • Robert Caro is an American journalist and author known for his biographies of influential political figures like Robert Moses and Lyndon B. Johnson. Caro's meticulous research and detailed writing style have earned him numerous prestigious awards for his biographical works. His most famous book, "The Power Broker," delves into the life and impact of Robert Moses, a significant figure in New York City's urban planning history. Caro's biographies are highly regarded for their depth and insight into the lives and actions of these prominent individuals.
  • Elliott Kalan is an American comedian known for his work as a head writer on shows like Mystery Science Theater 3000 and The Daily Show with Jon Stewart. He has also been involved in comedy groups and live stage shows, showcasing his talent in writing and performing. Kalan's background in comedy and television writing has contributed to his recognition in the entertainment industry.
  • The Robert Moses Parkway is a roadway in New York named after Robert Moses, a prominent urban planner. It is part of the transportation infrastructure in the state and connects various locations in the region. The parkway is significant due to its association with Moses, who played a key role in shaping New York's development during the mid-20th century. Moses' influence extended to various public works projects, including parks, highways, ...

Counterarguments

  • Moses's assertiveness could be interpreted as a necessary trait for a leader in his position, dealing with the complex and often resistant bureaucracy to achieve his vision for urban development.
  • His confrontations with legislators over patronage might be seen as an attempt to reduce political interference in the planning and execution of public works, aiming for efficiency over political favoritism.
  • The criticism of advisory boards could be viewed as a push for more direct and effective decision-making processes, rather than being bogged down by committees that may not have the same level of expertise or vision.
  • The erasure of Ansley Wilcox from Niagara park history could be argued as a common practice of attributing achievements to the person who brought projects to fruition, rather than their initiators.
  • The refusal to discuss the AutoCon incident might be seen as ...

Get access to the context and additional materials

So you can understand the full picture and form your own opinion.
Get access for free
The Power Broker #03: David Sims

Al Smith continues to protect and enable Moses despite controversies

Governor Al Smith, described as a populist figure, continues to support Robert Moses despite various controversies. Smith uses his political leverage to provide Moses with the protection and resources needed to carry on with his ambitious projects.

Shields Moses from calls for resignation over controversies

Al Smith displays a staunch willingness to protect Robert Moses amidst rising legislative opposition and public controversy. When Hutchinson and Hewitt, Republican Committee Chairmen, attempted to impede Moses' progress, Governor Smith diffused their protest by engaging them in a night of drinking and distraction, effectively neutralizing their complaints and allowing Moses to carry on with his work. Moreover, Smith even steps in to shield Moses from calls for his resignation, refusing to dismiss Moses over his contentious plans for Jones Beach, which demonstrated contempt for his budget allowance.

Provides political and financial support for Moses' schemes

Smith's support for Moses extends beyond mere protection. Despite reservations about the legality of Moses' appropriation of the Taylor estate, Al Smith chooses to sign the documents after being incensed by wealthy landowners' scorn for the city's working class. He later delays legislative action to coincide with peak public demand for parks, which secures the necessary approval of funds for Moses' projects.

Smith further fortifies Moses' position by delivering a radio speech rallying public support behind Moses' parks, framing it as a battle between the rich and the need of common people for public spaces. This maneuver culminates in both Al Smith and the Republican-led legislature agreeing to provide Moses with the funding needed in 1926, enabling the commencement of Moses' park projects.

When Moses faced a $22,000 fine and personal financial scrutiny, Smith interve ...

Here’s what you’ll find in our full summary

Registered users get access to the Full Podcast Summary and Additional Materials. It’s easy and free!
Start your free trial today

Al Smith continues to protect and enable Moses despite controversies

Additional Materials

Clarifications

  • Al Smith was a prominent political figure in New York, serving as the Governor of the state. He was known for his progressive policies and support for infrastructure development. Robert Moses was a powerful urban planner and public official who played a significant role in shaping the infrastructure of New York City and the surrounding areas. Moses was known for his ambitious public works projects, including the construction of parks, bridges, and highways.
  • Robert Moses faced controversies primarily related to his ambitious projects, such as the development of Jones Beach, which some criticized for exceeding budget allowances and showing disregard for public opinion. Additionally, Moses' appropriation of the Taylor estate raised legal concerns, and his actions led to financial scrutiny and fines. Despite these controversies, Governor Al Smith consistently supported Moses, shielding him from calls for resignation and providing political and financial backing for his initiatives.
  • Hutchinson and Hewitt were Republican Committee Chairmen who opposed Robert Moses due to his controversial plans and actions. They tried to hinder Moses' progress through legislative means, but Governor Al Smith intervened to protect Moses and ensure his projects continued despite their opposition. Governor Smith used his political influence to diffuse their complaints and shield Moses from calls for resignation, allowing Moses to carry on with his work.
  • Robert Moses faced a $22,000 fine and personal financial scrutiny, which was a significant issue as it could have impacted his reputation and financial stability. The fine and scrutiny were related to his handling of budget overreach and the development of Jones Beach, ...

Counterarguments

  • Al Smith's protection of Robert Moses could be seen as undermining the checks and balances necessary in a democratic system.
  • Shielding Moses from calls for resignation might ignore legitimate concerns and grievances from the public and other officials.
  • Providing political and financial support for controversial projects could be viewed as favoritism and may not reflect the best interests of all constituents.
  • Signing documents for Moses' schemes despite legality concerns raises questions about the rule of law and ethical governance.
  • Delaying legislative action to secure funds for projects could be interpreted as manipulative and not transparent.
  • Delivering a radio speech to rally support could be seen as using public sentiment to override legitimate criticism and debate.
  • Securing funding for park projects in the face of controversy might prioritize certain projects over other potentially more pressing public needs.
  • Intervening in legal issues and providing financial support for Moses could suggest a conflict of interest or an abuse of ...

Get access to the context and additional materials

So you can understand the full picture and form your own opinion.
Get access for free
The Power Broker #03: David Sims

Moses becomes Secretary of State for New York, gains more power and responsibilities

Robert Moses, appointed by Al Smith, becomes Secretary of State for New York, a position encompassing a wide range of duties, control over jobs, and a short-lived influence in the boxing industry.

Controls jobs and patronage

As Secretary of State, Moses controls a significant amount of patronage, due to the high number of people seeking licenses from the department he oversees. His responsibilities include various miscellaneous functions such as filing incorporation papers, compiling election results, and licensing auctioneers and private detectives. In addition to these duties, Moses is expected to coordinate state construction and collaborate with the state's cabinet.

Despite opposition from Albany, Moses secures the appointment, thanks in part to Al Smith's popularity and the media portraying Moses as the "parks man" opposite the "fat cats," casting his appointment in a favorable light.

Briefly regulates boxing industry amid corruption

Moses also has oversight of New York's athletic commission, which includes the regulation of the boxing industry. He confronts endemic corruption, particularly around boxing ticket sales. Moses tries to ensure fairness in ticket distribution, hoping to allow average citizens to purchase tickets. However, h ...

Here’s what you’ll find in our full summary

Registered users get access to the Full Podcast Summary and Additional Materials. It’s easy and free!
Start your free trial today

Moses becomes Secretary of State for New York, gains more power and responsibilities

Additional Materials

Clarifications

  • Robert Moses, a prominent figure in New York's history, was known for his influential role in urban planning and development projects. He held various positions in government, including serving as the Secretary of State for New York. Moses was recognized for his ambitious infrastructure projects, such as the construction of parks, bridges, and highways, which significantly shaped the landscape of New York City and the surrounding areas. His approach to governance was often characterized as authoritarian and controversial, as he wielded significant power and influence over public works projects in the region.
  • Al Smith was a prominent political figure in New York, serving as the Governor of New York and a key figure in the Democratic Party. He was known for his progressive policies and efforts to reform government and improve social welfare programs. Smith's support and endorsement were influential in Robert Moses' career advancement, including his appointment as Secretary of State for New York.
  • Robert Moses, as Secretary of State for New York, held significant power and influence. He controlled a substantial amount of patronage due to the licenses and functions under his jurisdiction. Moses also had responsibilities in state construction coordination and collaboration with the state's cabinet, showcasing the breadth of his authority in various areas.
  • Regulating the boxing industry posed challenges for Moses due to endemic corruption, especially in ticket sales. Moses aimed to ensure fairness in ticket di ...

Counterarguments

  • Moses' control over jobs and patronage could be seen as a concentration of power that may lead to potential abuses or favoritism.
  • The effectiveness of Moses' responsibilities, such as filing papers and licensing, could be questioned if they did not lead to significant improvements in the efficiency or transparency of those processes.
  • The expectation for Moses to coordinate state construction and work with the state's cabinet might be unrealistic if he lacked the necessary expertise or if there were bureaucratic obstacles.
  • Moses securing his appointment despite opposition could be criticized if the opposition had valid concerns about his qualifications or intentions.
  • The favorable portrayal of Moses as the "parks man" in the media might have overshadowed legitimate criticisms or concerns about his policies and actions.
  • Moses' regulation of the boxing industry and his confrontation with corruption could be criticized if his actions were ineffective or if they inadvertently harmed the industry.
  • The aim for fairness in ticket distribution is commendable, but the re ...

Get access to the context and additional materials

So you can understand the full picture and form your own opinion.
Get access for free
The Power Broker #03: David Sims

Moses takes on regulation of boxing in New York, struggles with corruption there

The podcast delves into Robert Moses' challenges and reluctances in regulating the boxing industry in New York, highlighting his struggles against systemic corruption and his eventual retreat.

Attempts reforms meet resistance from industry figures

Initially, the podcast suggests that Moses did not exhibit much enthusiasm for purging corruption from the boxing industry and contrasts this with his interest in reforming parks, which were a significant source of his influence and power. His tentative approach towards tackling the boxing corruption is implied to be a calculated move, stemming from an understanding that the public interest in addressing boxing controversies was limited in comparison to other areas under his control.

Backs down due to limited political will

Furthermore, the podcast indicates that Moses may have felt intimidated by the daunting prospe ...

Here’s what you’ll find in our full summary

Registered users get access to the Full Podcast Summary and Additional Materials. It’s easy and free!
Start your free trial today

Moses takes on regulation of boxing in New York, struggles with corruption there

Additional Materials

Clarifications

  • Robert Moses was a prominent figure in New York City and state politics during the mid-20th century. He held various influential positions related to urban planning and development, wielding significant power in shaping the city's infrastructure. Moses is known for his ambitious public works projects, including highways, bridges, and parks, but his methods were often criticized for their impact on communities and displacement of residents. His legacy is complex, with supporters praising his contributions to modernizing New York City while critics highlight the negative consequences of his top-down, authoritarian approach to urban planning.
  • The boxing industry in New York has a long history of corruption, including issues like fight fixing, bribery, and connections to organized crime. Prominent figures in the sport have been known to engage in unethical practices to manipulate outcomes and profit unfairly. This corruption has often made it challenging for regulators to effectively clean up the sport and ensure fair competition. The influence of powerful individuals within the industry has historically hindered efforts to implement meaningful reforms and hold wrongdoers accountable.
  • Robert Moses, a prominent figure in urban planning and politics, faced challenges when attempting to regulate the boxing industry in New York. His efforts to address corruption in boxing were met with resistance from industry figures, leading to his eventual retreat from the issue. Moses' approach to tackling boxing corruption was influenced by his perception of public interest and the complexities involved in dealing with a sector known for its rough nature and potential threats. These factors played a role in shaping Moses' interactions with the boxing industry during his time in power.
  • The exten ...

Counterarguments

  • Moses' reluctance to tackle boxing corruption might not stem from a lack of will but from a strategic prioritization of his political capital for battles he deemed more winnable or beneficial to the public.
  • Resistance from industry figures is common in any regulatory reform, and it may not necessarily indicate a unique challenge within the boxing industry or a particular failing on Moses' part.
  • The contrast between Moses' interest in reforming parks and his approach to boxing regulation could be due to the different nature of the problems and the varying degrees of public support, rather than a lack of interest in boxing reform.
  • The calculated approach to boxing corruption might reflect a nuanced understanding of the political landscape and the need for a more diplomatic or indirect strategy.
  • The perception of limited public interest in boxing controversies could be a misreading of public sentiment or a reflection of the times, which might have changed with increased awareness and demand for transparency in sports.
  • Backing down due to limited political will could be a misinterpretation; it might have been a tactical retreat in the face of insurmountable opposition, with the intention of regrouping and approaching the issue from a differ ...

Get access to the context and additional materials

So you can understand the full picture and form your own opinion.
Get access for free
The Power Broker #03: David Sims

Moses pushes his employees extremely hard, some crack under the strain

The work ethic and expectations set by Moses for his employees are intense and often lead to significant physical and emotional strain.

Workdays stretch from 9am to midnight

Moses' staff, known as "Moses' men," experience extreme pressure due to the demanding work environment he creates. They often work from 9 a.m. to midnight on many days. His expectations are high, and he's known to react with anger or coldness when he doesn't get what he wants. Despite the long hours, employees note that Moses never seems to tire and keeps them busy late into the night.

Some staffers become alcoholics or have nervous breakdowns

The intense work pace set by Moses has serious consequences for the health and well-being of his employees. Caro mentions that more than one becomes an alcoholic, some suffer nervous breakdowns, and marital problems are not uncommon. In a tragic case, at least one person who worked for Moses committed suicide, though Caro does not reveal the individual's identity out of respect for the person's family.

The crew's dedication to their work is further exemplified by their efforts on Jones Beach during the challenging winter of 1927 to 1928. Workers endure freezing conditions as they live on ships, work all day dredging and spreading sand over 17 miles, and kneel in freezing sand to plant beach grass by hand during windy, cold weather. The hardship of the job is illustrated by an incident where surveyors, trapped on the beach for 10 days due to freezing conditions, sur ...

Here’s what you’ll find in our full summary

Registered users get access to the Full Podcast Summary and Additional Materials. It’s easy and free!
Start your free trial today

Moses pushes his employees extremely hard, some crack under the strain

Additional Materials

Clarifications

  • Moses, in this context, is a figure known for his intense work ethic and high expectations for his employees. His staff, referred to as "Moses' men," work long hours under his demanding leadership style, which can lead to physical and emotional strain. The text highlights the extreme pressure and consequences faced by his employees due to the challenging work environment he creates. Moses himself is portrayed as a constantly active and demanding leader who orchestrates work efficiently to maintain high productivity levels.
  • Moses' demanding work ethic and high expectations stem from his relentless drive for productivity and efficiency in his projects. He pushes his employees to their limits to achieve ambitious goals and maintain control over every aspect of the work process. Moses' intense focus on work and his meticulous management style create a high-pressure environment where failure to meet his standards can result in harsh consequences for his staff. His dedication to his projects and his desire for perfection drive him to demand nothing less than total commitment from those working under him.
  • Jones Beach is a famous public beach on Long Island, New York, known for its expansive shoreline and recreational facilities. In the context of the text, the mention of Jones Beach highlights the challenging winter of 1927 to 1928 when workers faced extreme conditions while working on the beach under Moses' direction. The workers endured freezing temperatures, lived on ships, and performed physically demanding tasks like dredging and planting b ...

Counterarguments

  • Moses' demanding work ethic may have been a product of the times and the prevailing work culture, which often valued tireless dedication and long hours.
  • The intense work environment could be seen as a reflection of Moses' commitment to achieving his vision, which may have required extraordinary effort and sacrifice.
  • The high-pressure environment might have been necessary to meet the deadlines and expectations of the projects Moses was overseeing, which could have had significant public benefits.
  • Some employees might have thrived in such a challenging environment, finding motivation and satisfaction in meeting high expectations and being part of significant projects.
  • The work conditions described, such as living on ships and enduring freezing temperatures, could have been standard for the era, especially for large-scale construction projects.
  • The commitment to productivity and efficiency, as demonstrated by Moses' mobile office and streamlined work processes, could be seen as innovative and ahead of its time.
  • The negative outcomes, such as alcoholism and nervous breakdowns, might not be solely attributable to the work environment but could also be influenced by personal predispositions or external factors.
  • The suicide mentioned may have had complex causes, and it would be speculative to attribute it solely to the work environment without further information.
  • The dedication to clearing the work from the table eve ...

Get access to the context and additional materials

So you can understand the full picture and form your own opinion.
Get access for free
The Power Broker #03: David Sims

Moses makes deals and comprises with the wealthy but refuses to bend for regular citizens

It appears that there is missing content to elaborate on the topic outlined. Without additional information, an in-depth analysis or description cannot be provided. If there is specific content or context relating to Moses making deals and compromises with the wealthy w ...

Here’s what you’ll find in our full summary

Registered users get access to the Full Podcast Summary and Additional Materials. It’s easy and free!
Start your free trial today

Moses makes deals and comprises with the wealthy but refuses to bend for regular citizens

Additional Materials

Clarifications

  • Moses, in this context, is a hypothetical or fictional character being used to represent a figure who holds power or authority in a given situation. The name "Moses" is often use ...

Counterarguments

  • Moses's actions may be misinterpreted, and he could be working within a system that inherently favors the wealthy due to existing laws and regulations, rather than personal bias.
  • The deals with the wealthy might be part of a strategic plan that ultimately benefits all citizens, including regular citizens, in the long term.
  • Moses might be engaging with the wealthy because they have resources and influence that can be leveraged for public projects and initiatives that benefit the wider community.
  • The perception that Moses refuses to bend for regular citizens could be due to a lack of visible immediate outcomes, whereas long-term benefits for regular citizens might not be as apparent.
  • There could be instances where Moses has indeed worked in favor of regular citizens, but these actions have not received as much attention or have been overshadowed by his interactions with the wealthy.
  • The criticism might stem from a communication gap between Moses's office and ...

Get access to the context and additional materials

So you can understand the full picture and form your own opinion.
Get access for free
The Power Broker #03: David Sims

Moses builds popular parks and beaches on Long Island but often breaks laws and rules

Robert Moses, notorious for developing popular parks and beaches on Long Island, frequently chose expedients that skirted or outright broke ethical and legal standards, though the public largely embraced the resultant recreational spaces.

Public loves new recreation spaces

The public's enthusiasm for new recreational areas developed by Moses is evident. For example, the demand at Long Island state parks, with attendance exceeding half a million by summer’s end, and the consistent need to add more lockers at the Valley Stream State Park bathhouse to accommodate an influx of visitors, illustrate this popularity. Moses’s work is well-received by the public, particularly highlighted by the "crown jewel" Jones Beach, an enduringly popular location acknowledged for its appeal even by critics.

Ends often used to justify unethical or illegal means

Moses conceived of Jones Beach as a grand recreational complex and moved ahead with his plans despite legal injunctions. He strategically redirected funds earmarked for other purposes, such as tree nursery programs and oyster culturing, to his park and road building projects. When Moses faced a lawsuit and did not show up for a deposition, it suggested his disregard for the legal proceedings.

He forcefully attempted to acquire land in Babylon Township for his developments and violated the agreed sequence for starting the Northern State Parkway. He also disregarded a court ruling against his use of non-union labor for building bathhouses, reinforcing the belief that the end result—a public good like parks—could justify these means.

Despite the breaking of laws and bypassing of rules, Moses faced minimal consequences, evidenced by a trivial six-cent fine, and even retained land from the Taylor estate despite a court ruling deeming his acquisition illegal. The building was already in place, people were using the park, and judges were loath to dismantle established parks, suggesting an implicit acceptance that the ends justify the means.

Moses had significant financial leverage, demonstrated by having immediate access to $1 million from a $15 million budget, which he used fo ...

Here’s what you’ll find in our full summary

Registered users get access to the Full Podcast Summary and Additional Materials. It’s easy and free!
Start your free trial today

Moses builds popular parks and beaches on Long Island but often breaks laws and rules

Additional Materials

Clarifications

  • Robert Moses was a powerful urban planner in New York who shaped the city's infrastructure. He is known for developing numerous parks, beaches, and highways, including those on Long Island. Moses often faced criticism for his controversial methods, which involved bending or breaking laws to achieve his ambitious projects. His legacy is complex, with supporters praising his contributions to public recreation while critics highlight his disregard for legal and ethical standards.
  • Robert Moses, a prominent figure in urban planning, faced legal challenges for his methods in developing parks and recreational spaces on Long Island. Despite breaking laws and rules, Moses often faced minimal consequences, such as small fines, and managed to retain control over the land he acquired for his projects. His actions, while controversial, were sometimes accepted due to the popularity and public demand for the recreational areas he created. Moses used various tactics, including redirecting funds and leveraging financial resources, to push forward with his ambitious development projects.
  • The sunk cost fallacy is a cognitive bias where individuals consider past investments when making decisions about current or future actions, even if those investments should not influence the decision. In project management, this can lead to continuing a project based on the money or time already invested, rather than its potential future benefits. Robert Moses exploited this bias by intentionally starting construction on projects to make it difficult for authorities to halt them, leveraging the psychological tendency to avoid "wasting" previous investments.
  • Moses and Al Smith had a close working relationship where they collaborated on various projects, including the development of parks and recreational spaces. Their combined influence helped garner significant public support for these initi ...

Counterarguments

  • Moses's actions, while popular, set a dangerous precedent for public officials, suggesting that breaking laws can be overlooked if the outcome is favorable.
  • The public's enthusiasm for the parks does not necessarily equate to an endorsement of Moses's methods; people may simply be unaware of the ethical and legal breaches involved.
  • Redirecting funds from other programs could have had negative impacts on those initiatives, and the benefits of the parks must be weighed against the potential harm caused to other public services.
  • Disregarding legal injunctions and court rulings undermines the rule of law and could erode public trust in legal institutions.
  • The minimal consequences faced by Moses could reflect a failure of the legal system to hold influential individuals accountable, rather than an implicit acceptance of his actions.
  • Financial leverage and deceptive tactics to secure funds could have diverted resources from other necessary public works or services, potentially to the detriment of the broader community.
  • Exploiting the sunk cost fallacy to continue projects may have led to inefficient use of public funds and could have prioritized Moses's projec ...

Get access to the context and additional materials

So you can understand the full picture and form your own opinion.
Get access for free

Create Summaries for anything on the web

Download the Shortform Chrome extension for your browser

Shortform Extension CTA