PDF Summary:Jews Don’t Count, by David Baddiel

In Jews Don't Count, David Baddiel explores the frequent exclusion of Jewish people from the progressive movement's coalition of underrepresented communities. He argues that progressives often fail to regard antisemitism with the same urgency as other forms of racial discrimination, sometimes downplaying prejudice against Jews due to perceptions of their wealth and influence or conflating criticism of Israel with anti-Jewish sentiments.

Baddiel examines how some see antisemitism as a lesser concern, reluctantly confronting biases within their own liberal circles. He suggests that continually treating Jewish identity as separate from minority rights creates a hierarchy of racism, hindering efforts against all prejudice.

(continued)...

Situations where anti-Semitic behavior received less immediate focus or public outrage than comparable offenses directed at different minority communities.

Baddiel points out several examples of inconsistent responses, including an instance from his own experiences with individuals portrayed in racially insensitive makeup. He recognizes the discriminatory nature of his past decision to wear dark makeup for a comedic act and contemplates the persistent online censure he encounters, which frequently calls for him to remain silent. He contrasts this with the lack of condemnation towards comedian Leigh Francis, who, in his show "Bo' Selecta!," repeatedly depicted Baddiel as a stereotypical, caricatured rabbi, exaggerating Jewish features and speech patterns. The author has encountered backlash for wearing blackface, but his portrayal of Jewish stereotypes has largely gone unnoticed. Baddiel proposes a hierarchy of bigotry in which racial bias against Black individuals is frequently viewed as more severe than similar prejudices faced by Jewish people.

David Baddiel's examination of the responses to a British musician's antisemitic comments in 2020 further highlights the stratified levels of outrage. Despite facing substantial backlash for his comments, Wiley did not encounter a widespread demand to suppress his opinions on race-related issues, unlike the push to quieten the discourse from Baddiel, who had previously used racially insensitive makeup. This difference, Baddiel argues, reflects an underlying assumption that because his offense was against a "more important" racism, he has forfeited his right to speak about any racism, including those directed at him as a Jew.

The tendency to view antisemitism as a less severe type of racism stems from incorrect assumptions about the alleged power and advantages ascribed to those of Jewish heritage.

David Baddiel argues that the tendency to minimize the significance of antisemitism stems from a widespread yet mistaken assumption that Jews, presumed to be wealthy and powerful, do not experience the same level of oppression as other minority groups. He references Ash Sarkar, a journalist with communist leanings, arguing that discrimination towards Jews, frequently devoid of economic hardship components, signifies a type of racial discrimination that is seen as less significant than the systemic racism influencing policies and impacting different communities. Baddiel argues that such logic is flawed because it incorrectly associates economic status with immunity to racial prejudice, while ignoring the continuous and historical victimization of Jews.

Baddiel also critiques the habit of downplaying the present-day challenges faced by Jews through references to their past adversities, underscoring that occurrences like the Holocaust still have a deep impact on the daily existence of Jewish individuals. He challenges the notion that saying "Yes, but look at you now" should downplay the need to address anti-Semitism in the modern era.

Criticism of Israel's policies frequently becomes entangled with negative sentiments toward Jewish people, resulting in a reluctance to condemn statements that, while ostensibly opposing Israel's actions, actually conceal biases against Jews.

This part examines the complex relationship between criticism of Israeli politics and prejudice against Jews, highlighting how progressives often dismiss or rationalize statements that are anti-Semitic by framing them as political commentary on Israel.

The prevalent belief is that Jews, who are often classified within the "white" demographic, experience a lesser degree of discrimination compared to other minority groups.

Baddiel argues that labeling Jews as part of the "white" demographic plays a substantial role in diminishing the perceived gravity of antisemitism, particularly among organizations dedicated to addressing the issues of racial minorities. He explores the situation of Mear One, a street artist, whose controversial mural portrayed Jewish figures as "white," seemingly justifying his clichéd depiction by linking Jews to society's elite echelons. Baddiel contends that this type of classification often minimizes the gravity of bias against Jews, framing it as a mere commentary on a powerful collective instead of acknowledging it as discriminatory actions against a frequently sidelined community.

Baddiel also strengthens his case by scrutinizing the circumstances surrounding a white academic, Jessica Krug, who inaccurately presented herself as having African and Latin ancestry. When Krug's actual ancestry was revealed, she was frequently described in the media as "white and Jewish," a classification that Baddiel believes reinforces the concept that Jewish identity intensifies the perception of white privilege. David Baddiel argues that labeling Jews as white results in the neglect of their experiences with racism and reinforces the notion that they are not entitled to the same protections as other minority groups.

Dismissing concerns of antisemitism under the guise of defending Israel from criticism or to stifle legitimate political dissent.

Baddiel argues that conflating opposition to Israeli policies with hatred towards Jews complicates the issue, allowing remarks aimed at Jewish people to be misinterpreted as legitimate political discourse. David Baddiel confronts the idea that animosity towards Jews is exclusively a reaction to Israeli policies, citing Tariq Ali's suggestion that such discrimination could dissipate if the military operations and territorial dominance of that nation ceased. David Baddiel makes the case that such a claim overlooks the longstanding antisemitism that predates the founding of Israel.

Baddiel highlights a dangerous oversight among progressives, who may dismiss genuine concerns regarding antisemitism as attempts to suppress Palestinian advocacy, due to a tendency to view discrimination towards Jewish people solely in the context of animosity against Israel. He argues that criticizing Israel's policies is not automatically antisemitic, but it becomes so when it uses age-old stereotypes and language that collectively demeans the entire Jewish population.

Groups with progressive ideologies and liberal tendencies have failed to adequately address prejudice against Jews within their own ranks.

This section of the text highlights how biases against Jewish people are often overlooked and not addressed by those who identify with progressive ideologies, particularly within their own ranks.

Some individuals who lean politically to the left might minimize or overlook discriminatory behavior towards Jews, even when it occurs among their own political affiliates.

Baddiel argues that biases against Jewish people are frequently overlooked or not taken seriously by progressives, especially when these prejudices are present within their own political circles. This reluctance to confront the issue stems from a range of factors, including a discomfort in addressing prejudice within marginalized groups and a belief that focusing on antisemitism detracts from other, more pressing social justice battles.

There is a discernible reluctance to confront and condemn antisemitism when it appears to originate from groups that are seen as disadvantaged or subjugated.

Baddiel notes a marked reluctance among advocates for societal advancement to acknowledge and confront biases directed toward Jewish individuals, especially when such attitudes come from communities that have themselves been subject to historical injustices, and he highlights examples of this discrimination within certain circles of Black activism. David Baddiel observes that while progressives often condemn individuals for harboring antisemitic views, they fail to exert similar efforts to ostracize these individuals from dialogues on racism. The author argues that there is a selective bias which often deems it acceptable to marginalize certain ethnicities, especially African and Hispanic communities, from participating in conversations about racial discrimination.

David Baddiel argues that advocates for social advancement often neglect and fail to properly address antisemitism within marginalized communities. He suggests that those who champion progressive causes often find it challenging to reconcile their support for diverse groups with the presence of anti-Semitic views within their ranks. The author posits that such discomfort could lead to the marginalization of Jewish viewpoints and the minimization of the harm caused by antisemitism, particularly within progressive groups that profess to tackle different forms of bias.

The idea that emphasizing antisemitism shifts focus away from other critical issues pertaining to racial bias and discriminatory actions.

Baddiel explores the viewpoint held by certain individuals with progressive beliefs who view the emphasis on antisemitism as a distraction that hinders the address of other urgent racial and discriminatory injustices. He underscores instances where expressing his concerns regarding prejudice against Jews has led to accusations of detracting focus from matters deemed of greater significance. Baddiel compares this perspective to a progressive approach that seeks to diminish the distinct challenges faced by Jews through broadening the conversation to encompass all types of racial and discrimination issues.

Baddiel contends that the tendency to minimize the seriousness of prejudice against Jews suggests a hierarchy that prioritizes the challenges of certain minority groups over those faced by Jews, thereby deeming their concerns as less significant. The author argues that failing to acknowledge the interconnectedness of different forms of oppression, this hierarchy of discrimination undermines the wider fight against all kinds of prejudice.

Antisemitism is often viewed more as a tool for political conflict than as a critical issue that necessitates collective action.

The final section of the book highlights the way in which antisemitic sentiments are woven into political agendas, leading to a diminished focus on the impact this has on the everyday experiences of Jews.

The perspective is that allegations of antisemitism are frequently used more as a tool to discredit political opponents than to genuinely address the concern.

Baddiel explores the increasing politicization of antisemitism, concentrating particularly on its manifestations within the United Kingdom. He argues that while there was some truth to the accusations of antisemitism during the time when Corbyn led the Labour Party, these claims were also leveraged by opponents to damage the party's political standing. Baddiel is of the opinion that the prevailing political discourse has led many progressives to view assertions of anti-Jewish prejudice as being motivated more by political agendas than by genuine concern for Jewish people's well-being.

He mentions an instance where Matt Hancock subtly incited sentiments against Jews to undermine the Labour Party amidst a political contest. Baddiel highlights Hancock's ability to provoke a hostile reaction from the audience at the mere hint of anti-Jewish sentiment, which deeply troubled him and reflected the broader discomfort felt by Jews who are acutely aware of the pervasive nature of prejudice against them.

Supporters with Jewish ancestry who are in favor of progressive causes frequently find it difficult to express their worries regarding antisemitism among their peers, fearing that they might be perceived as opponents of the movement.

Baddiel argues that the politicization of antisemitism creates a complex dilemma for Jews with progressive values, as they must tackle bias directed at Jews within the circles of their own political alliances.

David Baddiel cites Hadley Freeman, a well-known columnist at the Guardian known for her forward-thinking perspectives, who has expressed frustration with the inclination of some progressives, despite their anti-racist stance, to treat antisemitism as if it's a less significant concern. Baddiel points out that this neglect creates a barrier causing Jewish individuals with progressive views to worry that speaking openly about their experiences with anti-Semitic prejudice might cast them as opponents to the broader movement for social justice.

Baddiel concludes his book by acknowledging the progress made in recognizing and addressing antisemitism in contemporary society. However, he emphasizes that the frequent conflation of criticism towards Israel with anti-Jewish bigotry, the tendency to dismiss or rationalize language that is antagonistic to Jews, and the political exploitation of the issue continually hinder attempts to address prejudice against Jewish individuals. Ultimately, he argues that a truly comprehensive and effective anti-racist movement must recognize the oversight of Jews among those groups deemed oppressed and commit to addressing the intricate challenges related to anti-Jewish bias.