This is a free excerpt from one of Shortform’s Articles. We give you all the important information you need to know about current events and more.
Don't miss out on the whole story. Sign up for a free trial here .
What’s the holdup over legislation to bolster child safety online? What concerns do tech giants have about potential legislation?
Despite growing outrage over tech giants’ failure to address child exploitation on social media platforms, federal legislation to tackle the issue has stalled in the US Senate for years. The delay has been caused by tech lobbyists, competing legislative priorities, and the challenge of balancing parental concerns with children’s rights.
Below we’ll dive into what the opponents and advocates of legislation for online safety for kids say.
Fighting Child Victimization Online
In a heated Senate Judiciary Committee hearing last month, lawmakers blasted Big Tech chief executives for their platforms’ failure to shield children from online sexual predators. Despite universal outrage, however, legislative action to bolster online safety for kids remains stalemated.
Background
In recent years, social media giants have faced growing criticism over their failure to address high levels of harmful online content that’s fueled a surge in child trafficking and sexual exploitation. The platforms have been accused of fostering environments where children are groomed, often by criminal enterprises, then sold for sex and controlled through their social media accounts.
Families of victims allege that social media platforms’ negligence has resulted in their children resorting to drug use and suicide, due to the relentless abuse they face online.
Federal Inaction
At present, the only federal legislation enacted to address internet-based child victimization is 2018’s Stop Enabling Sex Traffickers Act (SESTA), which aimed to curb sex trafficking by holding websites accountable for knowingly hosting or facilitating sex trafficking content. However, critics argue that the act infringes on internet freedom and is ineffective.
Since SESTA’s passage, numerous federal legislative efforts to tackle online child exploitation have stalled in the Senate. Five of these bills originated in the Judiciary Committee to:
- Criminalize the distribution of nonconsensual, intimate photos without individuals’ permission.
- Encourage collaboration among law enforcement in investigations of crimes against children.
- Give victims new ways to report child sexual abuse material to internet companies.
- Broaden the range of potential online crimes that platforms are required to report to the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children.
Another bill, the Commerce Committee’s Kids Online Safety Act (KOSA) sought to:
- Require social media networks, video game sites, and messaging apps to implement “reasonable measures” to protect minors from harm, such as online bullying, harassment, sexual exploitation, and self-harm.
- Provide tools for parents to monitor their children’s online behavior.
Legislation Obstacles
Experts say that a number of factors have made it difficult to pass federal online child safety legislation:
- Tech lobbyists have actively worked to kill the bills.
- Lawmakers’ attention has been diverted to other, competing priorities.
- The question of where to draw the line between protecting kids and restricting their rights remains unresolved.
Legislation Advocates
Proponents of child internet safety legislation say it’s high time for lawmakers to pass the Kids Online Safety Act, arguing that:
- The patchwork of state laws addressing internet-based child exploitation has created a chaotic landscape of regulations.
- Social media companies can’t be trusted to regulate themselves.
- The lack of decisive action on KOSA could make it harder to implement broader tech regulations.
Legislation Opponents
Critics of the Kids Online Safety Act (KOSA), including some tech giants and digital rights groups, have voiced concerns about potential free speech infringement and negative impacts on legitimate content that could result from overly broad restrictions.
Many chief executives at the Judiciary Committee’s February hearing highlighted their child safety protocols—including measures to verify users’ ages, parental consent tools, and systems for marking questionable content—and pledged to work with legislators, parents, and law enforcement to safeguard minors.
Looking Ahead
Some are skeptical about the passage of KOSA legislation, saying it will need to undergo the approval process from scratch and secure congressional leaders’ support.
However, others are more optimistic, saying that KOSA has enough support in the Senate to potentially advance in the coming months. The real hurdle the bill faces, they argue, would be securing House approval while wrangling with opposition from tech lobbying groups.
Want to fast-track your learning? With Shortform, you’ll gain insights you won't find anywhere else .
Here's what you’ll get when you sign up for Shortform :
- Complicated ideas explained in simple and concise ways
- Smart analysis that connects what you’re reading to other key concepts
- Writing with zero fluff because we know how important your time is