Perspectives on Gender: Conservative vs. Progressive Viewpoints

What shapes our understanding of gender in modern society? How do different cultural and political viewpoints influence the ongoing debate about gender identity and expression?

Today’s conversations about gender roles and identity have become increasingly complex and polarized. From traditional viewpoints to progressive ideologies, various perspectives on gender continue to shape laws, social norms, and personal experiences across the globe.

Keep reading to explore how different perspectives on gender impact our communities and what these viewpoints mean for the future of human rights and social equality.

Perspectives on Gender

Despite the growing prominence of gender theory, much of mainstream Western culture has resisted gender fluidity and various perspectives on gender remain. (To illustrate, consider the prevalence of hate crimes against LGBT people and the widespread use of the word “gay” as an insult at the turn of the 21st century). However, the advent of social media created new platforms for marginalized voices. This allowed more people to explore their gender identities, challenge traditional norms, and advocate for greater acceptance and equality. As a result, the visibility of diverse gender identities increased significantly. In turn, many nations have expanded legal protections for gender nonconforming people (people who break the gender mold in some way).

This advocacy of gender expansiveness has generated backlash. Many people who espouse traditional values, including a majority of American Christians, believe that your gender is defined by your sex at birth. Proponents of this perspective on gender, such as conservative pundit Jordan Peterson (12 Rules for Life), argue that there are natural differences between men and women. According to Peterson, it’s healthier to embrace these distinctions than it is to deny or resist them.

Many conservatives also view these distinctions as crucial to social stability and family structure. For example, some believe that the expansion of women’s rights comes at the expense of men’s opportunities. In that vein, Republican Vice Presidential candidate JD Vance recently commented that the US was being undermined by the increasing influence of “childless cat ladies.”

Similarly, some conservatives are concerned that the expansion of LGBT rights—including transgender children’s right to receive gender-affirming medical care—disrupt the moral framework that upholds the nuclear family, which they see as vital for raising well-adjusted children and maintaining social order. Some also believe that LGBT visibility subjects children to indoctrination, sexualization, and social contagion. This fear has motivated a plethora of anti-trans legislation, including laws that critics challenge as unconstitutional.

In contrast with this perspective on gender, proponents of gender expansionism believe that allowing people to express their authentic identities, and taking steps to achieve gender equality, promotes individual well-being, mental health, and human rights—all of which help build a healthier, more just society. For example, they emphasize that access to gender-affirming care at all ages can be life-saving, since it reduces rates of depression, anxiety, and suicide. They also argue that laws and strict cultural norms restricting women’s and LGBT rights infringe upon personal freedom and autonomy. According to theorist bell hooks, such a repressive society harms everyone.

In Communion, bell hooks writes that the contemporary feminist movement sought to dismantle the narrative dominated by male supremacy that confined women’s identities to domestic responsibilities and appraised their worth solely through their associations with men. Champions of gender equality have played a pivotal role in encouraging women to pursue academic accomplishments, career opportunities, and economic independence, while also motivating them to see themselves as capable, intelligent individuals deserving of self-determination and the realization of their aspirations. Women’s quest for equality in areas such as the workforce, educational institutions, and community involvement has paved new paths for their self-improvement and empowerment.

Reflection & Discussion Questions

1. How has social media influenced society’s understanding and acceptance of diverse gender identities? What are the potential benefits and drawbacks of social media’s role in this cultural shift?
2. The article presents contrasting perspectives on whether traditional gender roles contribute to or detract from social stability. How would you evaluate these different perspectives, and what evidence supports each position?
3. How do you think society should balance protecting children’s welfare with supporting individual freedom of expression? What factors should be considered when making related policy decisions?
4. The article mentions that some view gender equality as a zero-sum game where gains for one group mean losses for another. Do you agree with this perspective? Why or why not?
5. How might different cultural, religious, and political backgrounds influence people’s perspectives on gender identity and expression? What role should these factors play in public policy decisions?
6. The article discusses both legal protections and backlash against gender nonconforming individuals. What might be some effective ways to bridge the divide between different perspectives on gender while ensuring human rights are protected?

Want to fast-track your learning? With Shortform, you’ll gain insights you won't find anywhere else .

Here's what you’ll get when you sign up for Shortform :

• Complicated ideas explained in simple and concise ways
• Smart analysis that connects what you’re reading to other key concepts
• Writing with zero fluff because we know how important your time is

Start your free trial today!