Slow but Steady: Does It Really Win the Race?

A snail crossing a crack in the ground, representing a "slow but steady" mindset.

Is slow but steady always the best approach? Or are there times when snap decisions are better? A slow but steady approach to decision-making can help you make more purposeful and thoughtful decisions. However, having expertise in an area allows you to make good quick decisions, too. Read on for more on the benefits and drawbacks of a more thoughtful approach.

Do You Regret Purchases? Explaining Buyer’s Remorse

A sad woman regrets purchases as she holds her hand against a glass window displaying a coat in the city.

Why do we regret purchases after we make them? How can we make better buying decisions? When you regret purchases, it’s because your desire for something blinded you from thinking through the decision rationally. Often we think rationally only to justify these purchases after the fact. Learn why we get buyer’s remorse and why rationalizing purchases doesn’t help.

Leaving a Bad Relationship: When and Why to End It

A couple contemplating leaving a bad relationship as they argue with each other.

Why is leaving a bad relationship so hard? How do you know it’s time to go? Leaving a bad relationship instead of talking yourself into staying can be difficult, but it can also help you avoid regret. It’s important to recognize when you have mismatched values that can’t be reconciled. Here’s why you should evaluate your relationships early and honestly.

What Is Deliberate Practice? Working on Specific Weak Points

A woman swimming laps underwater in a public pool.

What is deliberate practice, and how can you use it to get better at something? What can this style of practicing do for your performance? Deliberate practice is a method of identifying your weaknesses and specifically targeting them, instead of generally practicing an entire set of skills. This process focuses your energy on where you need improvement the most. Continue reading to learn how deliberate practice works.

10,000 Hours to Become an Expert: Why Practice Matters

A silhouette of a pesron writing at a desk with gears and clouds in the sky.

Does it take 10,000 hours to become an expert? What does research say about how much practice you need? The idea that you need 10,000 hours to become an expert is backed by the research of psychologist Anders Ericsson and is famously cited in Malcolm Gladwell’s book Outliers. While there’s some debate around this exact figure, most agree that a lot of practice makes the difference between experts and non-experts. Read on for a look at all sides of the 10,000-hour debate.

Stop Lying to Yourself or You’ll Make Bad Decisions

A guy lying to himself about his health as he sits on the couch with junk food and a soda can in his hand.

Why do you always make bad decisions? And how do you stop lying to yourself about your choices? We all make bad decisions sometimes, and often it’s because we’re telling ourselves lies instead of basing our choices on reality. When we lie to ourselves, it’s easier to make unwise decisions. Here’s how to take control of your life and make better decisions.

Direct Practice: How Is It Different From Indirect Practice?

A woman writing in a journal with a cup of coffee beside her on a desk.

What is direct practice, and what separates it from indirect practice? Which is better? Direct practice is unique in that it involves engineering a situation in which you can practice skills, as opposed to practicing indirectly during normal activities. Both are effective, but there are certain situations in which direct is better. Take a look at this explanation of when to use direct practice and what it looks like.